Infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are emerging as an important challenge in healthcare settings. Currently, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are the species of CRE most commonly encountered in hospitals. CRKP is resistant to almost all available antimicrobial agents, and infections with CRKP have been associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly among persons with prolonged hospitalization exposed to invasive devices. We report nine patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who developed invasive infections due to carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp), KPC and OXA-48, strains that have not been previously identified in our hospital. Despite ceftazidime/avibactam therapy, five patients died. Coinfections can contribute to a poor prognosis for patients with COVID-19, especially for high-risk populations such as elderly patients. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a rigorous program of antibiotic administration in intensive care units.

Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, empiric antibiotics (ATBs) have been prescribed on a large scale in both in- and outpatients. We aimed to assess the impact of antibiotic treatment on the outcomes of hospitalised patients with moderate and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicentre cohort study in six clinical hospitals, between January 2021 and May 2021. Results: We included 553 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, of whom 58% (311/553) were prescribed antibiotics, while bacteriological tests were performed in 57% (178/311) of them. Death was the outcome in 48 patients—39 from the ATBs group and 9 from the non-ATBs group. The patients who received antibiotics during hospitalisation had a higher mortality (RR = 3.37, CI 95%: 1.7–6.8), and this association was stronger in the subgroup of patients without reasons for antimicrobial treatment (RR = 6.1, CI 95%: 1.9–19.1), while in the subgroup with reasons for antimicrobial therapy the association was not statistically significant (OR = 2.33, CI 95%: 0.76–7.17). After adjusting for the confounders, receiving antibiotics remained associated with a higher mortality only in the subgroup of patients without criteria for antibiotic prescription (OR = 10.3, CI 95%: 2–52). Conclusions: In our study, antibiotic treatment did not decrease the risk of death in the patients with mild and severe COVID-19, but was associated with a higher risk of death in the subgroup of patients without reasons for it.

It is well known that during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, antibiotics were overprescribed. However, less is known regarding the arguments that have led to this overuse. Our aim was to understand the factors associated with in-hospital antibiotic prescription for COVID-19, and the rationale behind it. We chose a convergent design for this mixed-methods study. Quantitative data was prospectively obtained from 533 adult patients admitted in six hospitals (services of internal medicine, infectious diseases and pneumology). Fifty-six percent of the patients received antibiotics. The qualitative data was obtained from interviewing 14 physicians active in the same departments in which the enrolled patients were hospitalized. Thematic analysis was used for the qualitative approach. Our study revealed that doctors based their decisions to prescribe antibiotics on a complex interplay of factors regarding the simultaneous appearance of consolidation on the chest computer tomography together with a worsening of clinical conditions suggestive of bacterial infection and/or an increase in inflammatory markers. Besides these features which might suggest bacterial co-/suprainfection, doctors also prescribed antibiotics in situations of uncertainty, in patients with severe disease, or with multiple associated comorbidities.

Objective: To identify carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) and to determine whether they had different risk factors for the acquisition of CRE than patients without COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective single-centre, case–control study enrolled patients with and without COVID-19. The demographic, clinical, infection, colonization and mortality data were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 38 patients with COVID-19 and 26 patients without COVID-19 were enrolled. The majority of isolates detected in COVID-19 patients were Klebsiella spp. Leukopenia at admission (odds ratio [OR] 4.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37, 16.10), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 5.74; 95% CI 1.07, 30.63), carbapenem treatment (OR 5.09; 95% CI 1.21, 21.27) and corticosteroid treatment (OR 7.06; 95% CI 1.53, 32.39) were independent risk factors for CRE acquisition in COVID-19 patients. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared with patients without COVID-19 (OR 20.62; 95% CI 5.50, 77.23). Length of ICU stay increased the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.81; 95% CI 1.33, 10.92). Conclusion: CRE strains were more common in patients with COVID-19 and they had different risks for CRE compared with patients without COVID-19.

This study aimed to identify isolates from colonization and assess the risk factors for bacterial colonization and the risk of death in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Constanţa County Infectious Diseases Hospital between September 2017 and September 2019. This was a retrospective case-control study in a single center that included all patients admitted to the ICU in Constanţa, Romania, who underwent bacteriological screening upon admission and 7 days after admission, between September 2017 and September 2019. In total, 253 patients were included in this study. The nasal exudate, pharyngeal exudate, and rectal swab samples were screened. In this study, 253 patients were screened bacteriologically, of which 53 had bacterial colonization and 200 did not. Among the bacterial strains, Klebsiella spp. (43.39%) was the most frequently isolated. The predominant resistance mechanism detected in the bacterial isolates was extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Multivariate analysis identified a Carmeli score of 3 as an independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization in the ICU. The mortality rate of patients with bacterial colonization was 11.32% and 6% for the patients without colonization (p>0.05). Our study revealed an increased prevalence of Enterobacterales colonization in the ICU. Risk factors for acquiring bacterial colonization differed depending on the type of bacterial colonization, such as ESBL, carbapenemases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). An independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization was the Carmeli score of 3.

Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD) is a rare genetic disease that affects the musculoskeletal system, including the heart, causing rhythm disorders and cardiomyopathy, sometimes requiring an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or heart transplantation due to severe heart damage. The case described herein concerns a 16-year-old girl, with grade II obesity, without other known pathological antecedents or cardiac pathology diagnosis given an annual history of cardiological investigations. She was admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department with SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. The anamnesis showed that the cardiological investigations performed in the past were completed due to the medical history antecedents of her sister, who had been diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, having undergone the placement of an ICD and a heart transplant. Numerous investigations were performed during hospitalization, which revealed high levels of high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), creatine kinase (CK) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Dynamic electrocardiographic evaluations showed ventricular extrasystoles, without clinical manifestations. The patient presented stage 2 arterial hypertension (AHT) during hospitalization. A cardiac ultrasound was also performed, which revealed suspected mild subacute viral myocarditis with cardiomyopathy, and antihypertensive medication was initiated. A heart MRI was performed, and the patient was diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, refuting the suspicion of viral subacute myocarditis. After discharge, as the patient developed gait disorders with an impossible heel strike upon walking and limitation of the extension of the arms and ankles, was hospitalized in the Neurology Department. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were dynamically performed, and because the rhythm disorders persisted, the patient was transferred to the Cardiology Department. On Holter monitoring, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was detected, so antiarrhythmic treatment was initiated, and placement of an ICD was subsequently decided and was diagnosed with EDMD. Genetic tests were also performed, and a mutation of the lamin A/C gene was detected (LMNA gene exon 2, variant c448A > C (p.Thr150pro), heterozygous form, AD).