Ahn JS, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.98

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) improves the spinal canal, with favorable clinical outcomes. However, it may not be useful for treating concurrent, severe central canal stenosis (SCCS). Therefore, we added biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) after OLIF, evaluated the combined procedure for one-segment fusion with clinical outcomes, and compared it to open conventional TLIF. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A underwent BESS with OLIF, and Group B were treated via TLIF. The length of hospital stay (LOS), follow-up period, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), fusion segment, complications, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and the modified Macnab criteria. All the clinical parameters improved significantly after the operation in Group A. The only significant between-group difference was that the EBL was significantly lower in Group A. At the final follow-up, no clinical parameter differed significantly between the groups. No complications developed in either group. We suggest that our combination technique is a useful, alternative, minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of one-segment lumbar SCCS associated with foraminal stenosis or segmental instability.

Ahn JS, et al. Asian Spine J. 2011 Sep;5(3):169-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2011.5.3.169

Park JH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Dec;8(4):399-406. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.399

Ahn JS, et al. Asian Spine J. 2007 Dec;1(2):75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2007.1.2.75