The actin capping protein (CP) tightly binds to the barbed end of actin filaments, thus playing a key role in actin-based lamellipodial dynamics. V-1 and CARMIL proteins directly bind to CP and inhibit the filament capping activity of CP. V-1 completely inhibits CP from interacting with the barbed end, whereas CARMIL proteins act on the barbed end-bound CP and facilitate its dissociation from the filament (called uncapping activity). Previous studies have revealed the striking functional differences between the two regulators. However, the molecular mechanisms describing how these proteins inhibit CP remains poorly understood. Here we present the crystal structures of CP complexed with V-1 and with peptides derived from the CP-binding motif of CARMIL proteins (CARMIL, CD2AP, and CKIP-1). V-1 directly interacts with the primary actin binding surface of CP, the C-terminal region of the α-subunit. Unexpectedly, the structures clearly revealed the conformational flexibility of CP, which can be attributed to a twisting movement between the two domains. CARMIL peptides in an extended conformation interact simultaneously with the two CP domains. In contrast to V-1, the peptides do not directly compete with the barbed end for the binding surface on CP. Biochemical assays revealed that the peptides suppress the interaction between CP and V-1, despite the two inhibitors not competing for the same binding site on CP. Furthermore, a computational analysis using the elastic network model indicates that the interaction of the peptides alters the intrinsic fluctuations of CP. Our results demonstrate that V-1 completely sequesters CP from the barbed end by simple steric hindrance. By contrast, CARMIL proteins allosterically inhibit CP, which appears to be a prerequisite for the uncapping activity. Our data suggest that CARMIL proteins down-regulate CP by affecting its conformational dynamics. This conceptually new mechanism of CP inhibition provides a structural basis for the regulation of the barbed end elongation in cells. Actin is a ubiquitous eukaryotic protein that polymerizes into bidirectional filaments and plays essential roles in a variety of biological processes, including cell division, muscle contraction, neuronal development, and cell motility. The actin capping protein (CP) tightly binds to the fast-growing end of the filament (the barbed end) to block monomer association and dissociation at this end, thus acting as an important regulator of actin filament dynamics in cells. Using X-ray crystallography, we present the atomic structures of CP in complex with fragments of two inhibitory proteins, V-1 and CARMIL, to compare the modes of action of these two regulators. The structures demonstrate that V-1 directly blocks the actin-binding site of CP, thereby preventing filament capping, whereas CARMIL functions in a very different manner. Detailed comparison of several CP structures revealed that CP has two stable domains that are continuously twisting relative to each other. CARMIL peptides were found to bind across the two domains of CP on a surface distinct from its actin binding sites. We propose that CARMIL peptides attenuate the binding of CP to actin filaments by suppressing the twisting movement required for tight barbed end capping. Our comparative structural studies therefore have revealed substantial insights in the variety of mechanisms by which different actin regulatory factors function.

The major cytoskeleton protein actin undergoes cyclic transitions between the monomeric G-form and the filamentous F-form, which drive organelle transport and cell motility. This mechanical work is driven by the ATPase activity at the catalytic site in the F-form. For deeper understanding of the actin cellular functions, the reaction mechanism must be elucidated. Here, we show that a single actin molecule is trapped in the F-form by fragmin domain-1 binding and present their crystal structures in the ATP analog-, ADP-Pi-, and ADP-bound forms, at 1.15-Å resolutions. The G-to-F conformational transition shifts the side chains of Gln137 and His161, which relocate four water molecules including W1 (attacking water) and W2 (helping water) to facilitate the hydrolysis. By applying quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations to the structures, we have revealed a consistent and comprehensive reaction path of ATP hydrolysis by the F-form actin. The reaction path consists of four steps: 1) W1 and W2 rotations; 2) P ^G –O ^3B bond cleavage; 3) four concomitant events: W1–PO ₃ ⁻ formation, OH ⁻ and proton cleavage, nucleophilic attack by the OH ⁻ against P ^G , and the abstracted proton transfer; and 4) proton relocation that stabilizes the ADP-Pi–bound F-form actin. The mechanism explains the slow rate of ATP hydrolysis by actin and the irreversibility of the hydrolysis reaction. While the catalytic strategy of actin ATP hydrolysis is essentially the same as those of motor proteins like myosin, the process after the hydrolysis is distinct and discussed in terms of Pi release, F-form destabilization, and global conformational changes.

Cytochalasin D (CytoD), a widely used actin inhibitor, is typically employed in cell studies as a simple barbed end capper. However, accumulating evidence suggests broader effects on actin dynamics. We addressed this by observing single actin filaments using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Our depolymerization assay confirmed that, at nanomolar concentrations, CytoD tightly caps barbed ends. The K _1/2 for inhibition was 4.1 nM, consistent with previous bulk measurements, and our approach revealed a capping duration of ~2 min. In polymerization assays, nanomolar CytoD completely suppressed barbed end elongation. Interestingly, at subnanomolar concentrations, CytoD caps barbed ends only transiently, rapidly associating and dissociating under both polymerizing and depolymerizing conditions. We interpreted this contradictory behavior as arising from differences in binding modes: capping one strand (fast dissociation) or both strands (slow dissociation). CytoD severs actin filaments at micromolar levels, a concentration range commonly used in cell biological studies. Although the severing rate is slower than cofilin, its higher frequency leads to filament fragmentation. Severing activity was suppressed by inorganic phosphate or cofilin. Our crystal structure of CytoD bound to filamentous conformation (F-form) actin showed that CytoD fits better in the hydrophobic cleft of F-form actin than monomeric conformation actin, explaining its preference for barbed end subunits. CytoD prevents barbed end depolymerization by stabilizing the terminal subunits in the F-form, which is supported by our MD simulations. These findings reveal the molecular mechanisms by which CytoD modulates actin dynamics and highlight the need for careful dosage control when treating cells with CytoD.