Syeda Mah-E-Muneer

Ms. Syeda Mah-E-Muneer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 February 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Md. Ariful IslamMd. Ariful Islam
Md. Ariful Islam
ZAZubair Akhtar
Zubair Akhtar
MHMd Zakiul Hassan
Md Zakiul Hassan
SCSukanta Chowdhury
Sukanta Chowdhury
MRMahbubur Rashid
Mahbubur Rashid
FCFahmida Chowdhury
Fahmida Chowdhury
The WHO Essential Medicines List Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification could facilitate antibiotic stewardship and optimal use. In Bangladesh, data on antibiotic dispensing in pharmacies according to the AWaRe classification are scarce. We aimed to explore antibiotic dispensing pattern in pharmacies according to the WHO AWaRe classification to aid pharmacy-targeted national antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). From January to July 2021, we interviewed drug-sellers from randomly selected pharmacies and randomly selected customers attending the pharmacies. We collected data on demographics and medicines purchased. We classified the purchased antibiotics into the Access, Watch, and Reserve groups among 128 pharmacies surveyed, 98 (76.6%) were licensed; 61 (47.7%) drug-sellers had pharmacy training. Of 2686 customers interviewed; 580 (21.6%) purchased antibiotics. Among the 580 customers, 523 purchased one, 52 purchased two, and 5 purchased three courses of antibiotics (total 642 courses). Of the antibiotic courses, the Watch group accounted for the majority (344, 53.6%), followed by the Access (234, 36.4%) and Reserve (64, 10.0%) groups. Approximately half of the antibiotics (327/642, 50.9%) were purchased without a registered physician’s prescription. Dispensing of non-prescribed antibiotics was higher in the Access group (139/234, 59.4%), followed by Watch (160/344, 46.5%) and Reserve (28/64, 43.8%) groups. These findings highlight the need to implement strict policies and enforce existing laws, and pharmacy-targeted ASP focusing on proper dispensing practices to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in Bangladesh.

18 June 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSyeda Mah-E-Muneer
Syeda Mah-E-Muneer
MHMd Zakiul Hassan
Md Zakiul Hassan
Md Abdullah Al Jubayer BiswasMd Abdullah Al Jubayer Biswas
Md Abdullah Al Jubayer Biswas
Fahmida RahmanFahmida Rahman
Fahmida Rahman
ZAZubair Akhtar
Zubair Akhtar
FCFahmida Chowdhury
Fahmida Chowdhury
Antimicrobials are empirically used in COVID-19 patients resulting in increased antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to assess antimicrobial use among suspected COVID-19 in-patients. From March to August 2020, we collected data from in-patients of 12 tertiary-level hospitals across Bangladesh. We identified suspected COVID-19 patients; collected information on antimicrobial received within 24 h before and on hospitalization; tested nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR. We used descriptive statistics and a regression model for data analysis. Among 1188 suspected COVID-19 patients, 69% were male, 40% had comorbidities, and 53% required oxygen. Antibiotics were used in 92% of patients, 47% within 24 h before, and 89% on admission. Patients also received antiviral (1%) and antiparasitic drugs (3%). Third-generation cephalosporin use was the highest (708; 60%), followed by macrolide (481; 40%), and the majority (853; 78%) who took antibiotics were SARS-CoV-2 negative. On admission, 77% mild and 94% moderately ill patients received antibiotics. Antibiotic use on admission was higher among severely ill patients (AOR = 11.7; 95% CI: 4.5–30.1) and those who received antibiotics within 24 h before hospital admission (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0–2.5). Antimicrobial use was highly prevalent among suspected COVID-19 in-patients in Bangladesh. Initiating treatment with third-generation cephalosporin among mild to moderately ill patients was common. Promoting antimicrobial stewardship with monitoring is essential to prevent blanket antibiotic use, thereby mitigating antimicrobial resistance.

29 August 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZAZubair Akhtar
Zubair Akhtar
SMSyeda Mah-E-Muneer
Syeda Mah-E-Muneer
MRMahbubur Rashid
Mahbubur Rashid
SAShakil Ahmed
Shakil Ahmed
Md. Ariful IslamMd. Ariful Islam
Md. Ariful Islam
FCFahmida Chowdhury
Fahmida Chowdhury
The general population has been excessively using antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the use of antibiotics for any reported illnesses in the preceding four weeks and knowledge of antibiotics among the general population in the community were assessed for possible interventions. A mobile phone survey among a general population across eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh was conducted during January–March 2021. Reported illness episodes irrespective of COVID-19 in the preceding four weeks of the interview, use of antibiotics for the illnesses, and knowledge on antibiotics among the general population were recorded. Descriptive analyses were performed. We randomly interviewed 1854 participants, with a mean age of 28.5 years (range: 18–75 years); 60.6% were male. Among all participants, 86.3% (95% CI: 84.7–87.8) heard names of antibiotics, but only 12.1% reported unspecified harmful effects, and 3.5% reported antimicrobial resistance when antibiotics were taken without a physician’s prescription. Among 257 (13.9%) participants, who consumed medicines for their recent illness episode, 32.7% (95% CI: 27.2–38.6) reported using antibiotics. Of those who could recall the names of antibiotics prescribed (n = 36), the most frequently used was azithromycin (22.2%) followed by cefixime (11.1%) and ciprofloxacin (5.6%). Our findings show an increased antibiotic use for illnesses reported in the preceding four weeks and an elevated knowledge at the community level during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period.

13 May 2026 in Acta Paediatrica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSyeda Mah-E-Muneer
Syeda Mah-E-Muneer
JKJahidur Rahman Khan
Jahidur Rahman Khan
MCMei Chan
Mei Chan
NHNusrat Homaira
Nusrat Homaira
KLKei Lui
Kei Lui
Aim: To examine the population pattern of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), death and composite outcome (BPD/death) in preterm infants in Australia. Methods: A retrospective population study using linked statewide health administrative data between 2005 and 2015 to estimate the incidence of BPD, death and composite outcome stratified by gestation: extremely preterm (EPT), very preterm (VPT) and moderate‐to‐late preterm (MPT). Associated risk factors were analysed using generalized estimating equation logistic regression models. Results: Of 1 047 885 live births, 73 314 (7%) were preterm, of whom 1906 died and 1898 developed BPD (25.9/1000). BPD incidence was highest in EPT (324.6/1000), followed by VPT (89.7/1000) and MPT (1.5/1000) infants. Annual BPD incidence increased from 23.5 (in 2005) to 28.0/1000 (in 2015) ( p < 0.001), while composite outcome marginally decreased from 55.3 to 46.3/1000 ( p = 0.629), driven by reduced mortality (32.5 to 18.8/1000) ( p < 0.001). Among 10 407 < 32 weeks infants, risk factors for BPD, death and composite outcomes were born EPT (aOR ranging 8.5–13.35), assisted vaginal/breech delivery (aOR 1.25–1.41), small‐for‐gestational‐age (aOR 3.27–3.88), male sex (aOR 1.21–1.42) and had low 5‐min APGAR score (aOR 1.64–12.47). Conclusion: The rising BPD incidence, predominantly among EPT survivors, was offset by reduced overall preterm mortality. Findings call for healthcare planning to cater for increased BPD survivors.