Surgical site infection is associated with longer postoperative hospital stays. We explored factors associated with longer postoperative hospital stay among patients in the surgical ward of a primary rural hospital in Ethiopia, where laboratory facilities for microbiological confirmation of surgical site infections were not available. METHODS: an observational study was performed for patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent elective or emergency surgery from 22nd June 2017 to 19th July 2018. Data were taken from paper-based medical records and patient interviews. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay. Data were analyzed by multivariable linear regression using Stata software, version 13. RESULTS: seventy-five patients were enrolled, sociodemographic data was obtained from 14 of these patients by interview, and 44 patients had complete outcome and covariate data and were included in regression analysis. Median length of preoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 2.0) days. Postoperative length of hospital stay was longer by 3.8 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-6.55; p=0.008), 4.7 days (95% CI 1.64-7.66; p=0.004), and 5.9 days (95% CI 2.70-9.02; p=0.001), for patients 35-54 years, 55-64 years and the 65+ years respectively, compared to patients who were 18-34 years of age. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics stayed 5.3 days longer (95% CI 1.67-8.87; p=0.005) compared to those who were not given preoperative antibiotics. CONCLUSION: age and improper use of preoperative antibiotics compound the risk for postoperative length of stay. Infection prevention protocols, including staff training, and surveillance for surgical site infections are critical for improving hospital outcomes.

Hospitals in the United States often have an abundance of unused medical supplies and equipment while many developing countries are in considerable need of these resources. Many nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have donated medical equipment to health centers in low-resource settings to rectify this issue; however, studies show many of these donations are not usable by the facilities that receive them. To better serve the partner hospitals of our NGO, Oasis Medical Relief, we investigated the perspectives and insights of Ethiopian healthcare workers (HCWs) on the medical equipment distribution paradigm of the country. Qualitative analysis including semi-structured, open-ended interviews was conducted. Semi-structured interviews (n = six) were conducted with HCWs (four physicians and two hospital administrators) working in hospitals in Addis Ababa and Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR) of Ethiopia. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Categorical content analysis was utilized to develop themes. The topical areas addressed by our questions include populations served, prevalence of diseases, laws, and strategies guiding medical equipment distribution, funding and budget for medical equipment, etc. Three themes related to perspectives and insights of HCWs on the current medical equipment distribution paradigm in Ethiopia interviewed include: (1) state of healthcare concerns, (2) medical equipment scarcity, and (3) policy shaping medical distribution paradigm. Pre-donation assessments utilized to understand equipment needs are recognized by the World Health Organization to more effectively address medical equipment/supply. However, to further strengthen such efforts, qualitative interviews with HCWs are a tool that can be utilized to better understand the intricacies of Ethiopia’s complex medical distribution paradigm. This can potentially lead to more effective partnerships between NGOs and their partner hospitals. Furthermore, increasing decentralized methods of procuring medical equipment should be further explored to mitigate issues with national distribution of medical supplies.