Peter Prinzie

Prof. Dr. Peter Prinzie

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2010 in Child Abuse & Neglect
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlbert Reijntjes
Albert Reijntjes
JKJan H. Kamphuis
Jan H. Kamphuis
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie
MTMichael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch

1 January 2009 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie
GSGeert Jan J. M. Stams
Geert Jan J. M. Stams
MDMaja Deković
Maja Deković
ARAlbert H. A. Reijntjes
Albert H. A. Reijntjes
JBJay Belsky
Jay Belsky
To investigate the association between Big Five personality factors and three dimensions of parenting-warmth, behavioral control, and autonomy support-the authors conducted meta-analyses using 5,853 parent-child dyads that were included in 30 studies. Effect sizes were significant and robust across mother and father reports and across assessment methods of parenting (self-report versus observations) but were generally small in magnitude. Higher levels of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness and lower levels of Neuroticism were related to more warmth and behavioral control, whereas higher levels of Agreeableness and lower levels of Neuroticism were related to more autonomy support. Several factors moderated the relationship between specific personality dimensions and parenting: child and parental age, reliability of observational assessment of parenting behavior, and study design. Taken together, these results indicate that personality can be seen as an inner resource that affects parenting.

8 November 2010 in Aggressive Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlbert Reijntjes
Albert Reijntjes
JKJan H. Kamphuis
Jan H. Kamphuis
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie
PBPaul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen
MSMenno van der Schoot
Menno van der Schoot
MTMichael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch

1 February 2013 in Clinical Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKirsten L. Buist
Kirsten L. Buist
MDMaja Deković
Maja Deković
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie

1 July 2020 in Psychological Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WEWillemijn M. van Eldik
Willemijn M. van Eldik
AHAmaranta D. de Haan
Amaranta D. de Haan
LPLucia Q. Parry
Lucia Q. Parry
PDPatrick T. Davies
Patrick T. Davies
MLMaartje P. C. M. Luijk
Maartje P. C. M. Luijk
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie
The aim of the current meta-analysis was to aggregate concurrent and longitudinal empirical research on associations between the interparental relationship and both children's maladjustment (i.e., externalizing and internalizing symptoms) and children's responses to interparental conflict (i.e., emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and physiological). Based on major theoretical frameworks, we distinguished between six dimensions of the interparental relationship: relationship quality, conflict frequency, hostile, disengaged, and unconstructive forms of conflict, and child-related conflict. A final selection of 169 studies for child maladjustment and 61 studies for child responses to conflict were included. The findings revealed by the expansive and fine-grained approach of this meta-analysis support and challenge theoretical hypotheses about the relative predictive value of dimensions of the interparental relationship for children's functioning. Although hostility was specifically more strongly associated with children's externalizing behavior and emotional responses to conflict, disengaged and unconstructive conflict behavior posed similar risks for the other domains of child functioning. In addition, relationship quality, conflict frequency, and child-related conflict warrant more attention in theoretical frameworks, as these dimensions posed similar risks to child functioning as the different forms of conflict. Moreover, most associations between the interparental relationship and child functioning endured over time. Also, developmental and gender differences appeared to depend on the specific forms of interparental conflict and the domain of child functioning. In sum, the results support the growing consensus that prevention and intervention programs aimed at children's mental health could benefit from an alternative or additional focus on the interparental relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

1 January 2014 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAlithe L. Van Den Akker
Alithe L. Van Den Akker
MDMaja Deković
Maja Deković
JAJessica Asscher
Jessica Asscher
PPPeter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie
In this study, we investigated mean-level personality development in children from 6 to 20 years of age. Additionally, we investigated longitudinal, bidirectional associations between child personality and maternal overreactive and warm parenting. In this 5-wave study, mothers reported on their child's personality from Time 1 (T1) through Time 4 (T4), and children provided self-reports from Time 2 (T2) through Time 5 (T5). Mothers reported on their levels of overreactive and warm parenting from T2 through T4. Using cohort-sequential latent growth curve modeling, we investigated mother reported child personality from 6 to 17 years of age and child reported personality from 9 to 20 years of age. Extraversion decreased linearly across the entire study. Benevolence and conscientiousness increased from middle to late childhood, temporarily declined from late childhood to mid-adolescence, and increased again thereafter. Imagination decreased from middle childhood to mid-adolescence and also increased thereafter. Mothers reported a temporary decline in emotional stability with an increase thereafter, whereas children did not. Boys and girls differed in mean-levels of the personality dimensions and, to a lesser extent, in the degree and direction of changes. Latent difference score modeling showed that child personality predicted changes in parenting and that, to a lesser extent, parenting predicted changes in child traits. Additionally, changes in child personality were associated with changes in maternal parenting. Results of the present study show that personality change is not directed at increasing maturity from childhood to mid-adolescence and that it elicits and is shaped by both positive and negative parenting.