Vasiliki Maria Iliadou

Prof. Dr. Vasiliki Maria Iliadou

Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 November 2017 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
MPMartin Ptok
Martin Ptok
HGHelen Grech
Helen Grech
EPEllen Raben Pedersen
Ellen Raben Pedersen
ABAndré Brechmann
André Brechmann
DBDoris-Eva Bamiou
Doris-Eva Bamiou
Current notions of “hearing impairment,” as reflected in clinical audiological practice, do not acknowledge the needs of individuals who have normal hearing pure tone sensitivity but who experience auditory processing difficulties in everyday life that are indexed by reduced performance in other more sophisticated audiometric tests such as speech audiometry in noise or complex non-speech sound perception. This disorder, defined as “Auditory Processing Disorder” (APD) or “Central Auditory Processing Disorder” is classified in the current tenth version of the International Classification of diseases as H93.25 and in the forthcoming beta eleventh version. APDs may have detrimental effects on the affected individual, with low esteem, anxiety, and depression, and symptoms may remain into adulthood. These disorders may interfere with learning per se and with communication, social, emotional, and academic-work aspects of life. The objective of the present paper is to define a baseline European APD consensus formulated by experienced clinicians and researchers in this specific field of human auditory science. A secondary aim is to identify issues that future research needs to address in order to further clarify the nature of APD and thus assist in optimum diagnosis and evidence-based management. This European consensus presents the main symptoms, conditions, and specific medical history elements that should lead to auditory processing evaluation. Consensus on definition of the disorder, optimum diagnostic pathway, and appropriate management are highlighted alongside a perspective on future research focus.

1 July 2009 in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
DBDoris-Eva Bamiou
Doris-Eva Bamiou
SKStergios Kaprinis
Stergios Kaprinis
DKDimitris Kandylis
Dimitris Kandylis
GKGeorge Kaprinis
George Kaprinis

10 January 2007 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMelissa Thys
Melissa Thys
KBKris Van Den Bogaert
Kris Van Den Bogaert
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
KVKathleen Vanderstraeten
Kathleen Vanderstraeten
NDNele Dieltjens
Nele Dieltjens
GCGuy Van Camp
Guy Van Camp
Otosclerosis is a common form of hearing impairment among white adults with a prevalence of 0.3–0.4%. It is caused by abnormal bone homeostasis of the otic capsule that compromises free motion of the stapes in the oval window. Otosclerosis is in most patients a multifactorial disease, caused by both genetic and environmental factors. In some cases, the disease is inherited as a monogenic autosomal dominant trait, sometimes with reduced penetrance. However, families large enough for genetic linkage studies are extremely rare. To date, five loci (OTSC1-5) have been reported, but none of the responsible genes have been cloned yet. An additional locus, OTSC6, has been reported to the HUGO nomenclature committee but the relevant linkage study has not been published. In this study, a genome-wide linkage study was performed in a large Greek pedigree segregating autosomal dominant otosclerosis. A seventh locus, OTSC7, was localized on chromosome 6q13–16.1 with a multipoint LOD score of 7.5 in the 13.47 cM region defined by markers D6S1036 (centromeric) and D6S300 (telomeric). Linkage analysis of this new locus in 13 smaller Belgian and Dutch families has identified one family from The Netherlands in which allele segregation suggests linkage to this region. The overlap between the critical regions of these two families is a 1.06 Mb interval between the genetic markers D6S1036 (centromeric) and D6S406 (telomeric) on chromosome 6q13.

1 September 2002 in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndreas Pampanos
Andreas Pampanos
JEJohn Economides
John Economides
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
PNPolyxeni Neou
Polyxeni Neou
PLPaulos Leotsakos
Paulos Leotsakos
MPMichael B Petersen
Michael B Petersen

28 February 2017 in International Journal of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGail D. Chermak
Gail D. Chermak
DBDoris-Eva Bamiou
Doris-Eva Bamiou
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
FMFrank E. Musiek
Frank E. Musiek
Objective: To provide audiologists with strategies to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Design: Tutorial. Study sample: None. Results: Strategies are reviewed to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose CAPD. Conclusions: Differential diagnosis is exceedingly important and can be quite challenging. Distinguishing between two or more conditions presenting with similar symptoms or attributes requires multidisciplinary, comprehensive assessment. To ensure appropriate interventions, the audiologist is a member of the multidisciplinary team responsible for determining whether there is an auditory component to other presenting deficits or whether one condition is responsible for the symptoms seen in another. Choice of tests should be guided both by the symptoms of the affected individual, as established in an in-depth interview and case history, the individual’s age and primary language, and by the specific deficits reported to be associated with specific clinical presentations. Knowing which tests are available, their strengths and limitations, the processes assessed, task and response requirements, and the areas of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) to which each test is most sensitive provides the audiologist with critical information to assist in the differential diagnostic process.

1 May 2017 in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vasiliki Maria IliadouVasiliki Maria Iliadou
Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
DBDoris-Eva Bamiou
Doris-Eva Bamiou
CSChristos Sidiras
Christos Sidiras
NMNikolaos P. Moschopoulos
Nikolaos P. Moschopoulos
Magda TsolakiMagda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki
GCGail D. Chermak
Gail D. Chermak
Background:The known link between auditory perception and cognition is often overlooked when testing for cognition.Purpose:To evaluate auditory perception in a group of older adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Research Design:A cross-sectional study of auditory perception.Study Sample:Adults with MCI and adults with no documented cognitive issues and matched hearing sensitivity and age.Data collection:Auditory perception was evaluated in both groups, assessing for hearing sensitivity, speech in babble (SinB), and temporal resolution.Results:Mann‐Whitney test revealed significantly poorer scores for SinB and temporal resolution abilities of MCIs versus normal controls for both ears. The right-ear gap detection thresholds on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) Test clearly differentiated between the two groups (p < 0.001), with no overlap of values. The left ear results also differentiated the two groups (p < 0.01); however, there was a small degree of overlap ∼8-msec threshold values. With the exception of the left-ear inattentiveness index, which showed a similar distribution between groups, both impulsivity and inattentiveness indexes were higher for the MCIs compared to the control group.Conclusions:The results support central auditory processing evaluation in the elderly population as a promising tool to achieve earlier diagnosis of dementia, while identifying central auditory processing deficits that can contribute to communication deficits in the MCI patient population. A measure of temporal resolution (GIN) may offer an early, albeit indirect, measure reflecting left temporal cortical thinning associated with the transition between MCI and Alzheimer’s disease.