Artificial intelligence has been prevalent recently as its use in the medical field is noticed to be increased. However, middle east countries like Syria are deficient in multiple AI implementation methods in the field of medicine. So, holding these AI implementation methods in the medical field is necessary, which may be incredibly beneficial for making diagnosis more accessible and help in the treatment. This paper intends to determine AI's knowledge, attitude, and practice among doctors and medical students in Syria. A questionnaire conducted an online cross-sectional study on the google form website consisting of demographic data, knowledge, and perception of AI. There were 1,494 responses from both doctors and medical students. We included Syrian medical students and doctors who are currently residing in Syria. Of the 1,494 participants, 255 (16.9%) are doctors, while the other 1,252 (83.1%) are undergraduate medical students. About 1,055 (70%) participants have previous knowledge about AI. However, only 357 (23.7%) participants know about its application in the medical field. Most have shown positive attitudes toward its necessity in the medical field; 689 (45.7%) individuals strongly agree, and 628 (41.7%) agree. The undergraduate students had 3.327 times more adequate knowledge of AI than students in the first year. In contrast, the undergraduate 6th-year students had 2.868 times the attitude toward AI higher than students in the first year. The residents and assistant professors had 2.371 and 4.422 times the practice of AI higher than students, respectively. Although most physicians and medical students do not sufficiently understand AI and its significance in the medical field, they have favorable views regarding using AI in the medical field. Syrian medical authorities and international organizations should suggest including artificial intelligence in the medical field, particularly when training residents and fellowship physicians.

Oversampling is the most utilized approach to deal with class-imbalanced datasets, as seen by the plethora of oversampling methods developed in the last two decades. We argue in the following editorial the issues with oversampling that stem from the possibility of overfitting and the generation of synthetic cases that might not accurately represent the minority class. These limitations should be considered when using oversampling techniques. We also propose several alternate strategies for dealing with imbalanced data, as well as a future work perspective.

Electrocardiography (ECG), improved by artificial intelligence (AI), has become a potential technique for the precise diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. The conventional ECG is a frequently used, inexpensive, and easily accessible test that offers important information about the physiological and anatomical state of the heart. However, the ECG can be interpreted differently by humans depending on the interpreter's level of training and experience, which could make diagnosis more difficult. Using AI, especially deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to look at single, continuous, and intermittent ECG leads that has led to fully automated AI models that can interpret the ECG like a human, possibly more accurately and consistently. These AI algorithms are effective non-invasive biomarkers for cardiovascular illnesses because they can identify subtle patterns and signals in the ECG that may not be readily apparent to human interpreters. The use of AI in ECG analysis has several benefits, including the quick and precise detection of problems like arrhythmias, silent cardiac illnesses, and left ventricular failure. It has the potential to help doctors with interpretation, diagnosis, risk assessment, and illness management. Aside from that, AI-enhanced ECGs have been demonstrated to boost the identification of heart failure and other cardiovascular disorders, particularly in emergency department settings, allowing for quicker and more precise treatment options. The use of AI in cardiology, however, has several limitations and obstacles, despite its potential. The effective implementation of AI-powered ECG analysis is limited by issues such as systematic bias. Biases based on age, gender, and race result from unbalanced datasets. A model's performance is impacted when diverse demographics are inadequately represented. Potentially disregarded age-related ECG variations may result from skewed age data in training sets. ECG patterns are affected by physiological differences between the sexes; a dataset that is inclined toward one sex may compromise the accuracy of the others. Genetic variations influence ECG readings, so racial diversity in datasets is significant. Furthermore, issues such as inadequate generalization, regulatory barriers, and interpretability concerns contribute to deployment difficulties. The lack of robustness in models when applied to disparate populations frequently hinders their practical applicability. The exhaustive validation required by regulatory requirements causes a delay in deployment. Difficult models that are not interpretable erode the confidence of clinicians. Diverse dataset curation, bias mitigation strategies, continuous validation across populations, and collaborative efforts for regulatory approval are essential for the successful deployment of AI ECG in clinical settings and must be undertaken to address these issues. To guarantee a safe and successful deployment in clinical practice, the use of AI in cardiology must be done with a thorough understanding of the algorithms and their limits. In summary, AI-enhanced electrocardiography has enormous potential to improve the management of cardiovascular illness by delivering precise and timely diagnostic insights, aiding clinicians, and enhancing patient outcomes. Further study and development are required to fully realize AI's promise for improving cardiology practices and patient care as technology continues to advance.

Background: Although several studies examining nurses’ turnover intentions have been conducted, few studies have been conducted to explore how COVID-19 contributes to nurses’ turnover intentions. This study aims to compare nurses’ turnover (TO) intentions before and during COVID-19. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted using the Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6) and a convenience sample of participants from the largest healthcare provider in Qatar between August and September 2020. Results: A total of 512 nurses were included in the final analysis. The majority were between 31 and 40 years of age (61.5%), 67.6% were females, 76.4% were married, 79.7% had a BSN, 43% had less than 5 years of experience, and 60.4% had worked in COVID-19 designated facilities. The turnover intentions were higher compared with before COVID-19 (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Nurses in Qatar have higher TO intentions during COVID-19. The participants’ characteristics and stress levels are playing a major role in nurses’ decision to leave during COVID-19. Understanding the factors that contribute to turnover intentions is crucial for workforce planning, especially during pandemics.

Aim: This narrative review explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into nursing informatics and examines its impact on nursing practice, healthcare delivery, education, and policy.Background: Nursing informatics, which merges nursing science with information management and communication technologies, is crucial in modern healthcare. The emergence of AI presents opportunities to improve diagnostics, treatment, and healthcare resource management. However, integrating AI into nursing practice also brings challenges, including ethical concerns and the need for specialized training.Sources of evidence: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2013 to December 2023 using databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Articles were selected based on their relevance to AI's role in nursing informatics, particularly in enhancing patient care and healthcare efficiency.Discussion: AI significantly enhances nursing practice by improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing care plans, and supporting resource allocation. However, its adoption raises ethical issues, such as data privacy concerns and biases within AI algorithms. Ensuring that nurses are adequately trained in AI technologies is essential for safe and effective integration.Implications for nursing practice and policy: Policymakers should promote AI literacy programs for healthcare professionals and develop ethical guidelines to govern the use of AI in healthcare. This will ensure that AI tools are implemented responsibly, protecting patient rights and enhancing healthcare outcomes.Conclusion: AI offers promising advancements in nursing informatics, leading to more efficient patient care and improved decision‐making. Nonetheless, overcoming ethical challenges and ensuring AI literacy among nurses are critical steps for successful implementation.