Lars Elsgaard

Dr. Lars Elsgaard

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 January 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJi Chen
Ji Chen
LELars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard
Kees Jan van GroenigenKees Jan van Groenigen
Kees Jan van Groenigen
JOJørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen
ZLZhi Liang
Zhi Liang
UJUffe Jørgensen
Uffe Jørgensen

12 June 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJi Chen
Ji Chen
Kees Jan van GroenigenKees Jan van Groenigen
Kees Jan van Groenigen
BHBruce A. Hungate
Bruce A. Hungate
CTCesar Terrer
Cesar Terrer
JVJan-Willem Veening
Jan-Willem Veening
LELars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard

13 September 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XHXianjin He
Xianjin He
EAElsa Abs
Elsa Abs
SASteven D. Allison
Steven D. Allison
FTFeng Tao
Feng Tao
YHYuanyuan Huang
Yuanyuan Huang
DGDaniel S. Goll
Daniel S. Goll
Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) affects the fate and storage of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems, but its global importance remains uncertain. Accurately modeling and predicting CUE on a global scale is challenging due to inconsistencies in measurement techniques and the complex interactions of climatic, edaphic, and biological factors across scales. The link between microbial CUE and soil organic carbon relies on the stabilization of microbial necromass within soil aggregates or its association with minerals, necessitating an integration of microbial and stabilization processes in modeling approaches. In this perspective, we propose a comprehensive framework that integrates diverse data sources, ranging from genomic information to traditional soil carbon assessments, to refine carbon cycle models by incorporating variations in CUE, thereby enhancing our understanding of the microbial contribution to carbon cycling.

22 June 2023 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Julian KochJulian Koch
Julian Koch
LELars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard
MGMogens H. Greve
Mogens H. Greve
SGSteen Gyldenkærne
Steen Gyldenkærne
CHCecilie Hermansen
Cecilie Hermansen
Simon StisenSimon Stisen
Simon Stisen
The substantial climate change mitigation potential of restoring peatlands through rewetting and intensifying agriculture to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is largely recognized. The green deal in Denmark aims at restoring 100 000 ha of peatlands by 2030. This area corresponds to more than half of the Danish peatland, with an expected reduction in GHG emissions of almost half of the entire land use, land use change and forestry (LULUFC) emissions. Recent advances established the functional relationship between hydrological regimes, i.e., water table depth (WTD), and CO2 and CH4 emissions. This builds the basis for science-based tools to evaluate and prioritize peatland restoration projects. With this article, we lay the foundation of such a development by developing a high-resolution WTD map for Danish peatlands. Further, we define WTD response functions (CO2 and CH4) fitted to Danish flux data to derive a national GHG emission estimate for peat soils. We estimate the annual GHG emissions to be 2.6 Mt CO2-eq, which is around 15 % lower than previous estimates. Lastly, we investigate alternative restoration scenarios and identify substantial differences in the GHG reduction potential depending on the prioritization of fields in the rewetting strategy. If wet fields are prioritized, which is not unlikely in a context of a voluntary bottom-up approach, the GHG reduction potential is just 30 % for the first 10 000 ha with respect to a scenario that prioritizes drained fields. This underpins the importance of the proposed framework linking WTD and GHG emissions to guide a spatially differentiated peatland restoration. The choice of model type used to fit the CO2 WTD response function, the applied global warming potentials and uncertainties related to the WTD map are investigated by means of a scenario analysis, which suggests that the estimated GHG emissions and the reduction potential are associated with coefficients of variation of 13 % and 22 %, respectively.

25 July 2023 in European Journal of Soil Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LRLeonor Rodrigues
Leonor Rodrigues
ABAlice Budai
Alice Budai
LELars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard
BHBrieuc Hardy
Brieuc Hardy
SKSonja G. Keel
Sonja G. Keel
JLJens Leifeld
Jens Leifeld
Biochar is a carbon (C)‐rich material produced from biomass by anoxic or oxygen‐limited thermal treatment known as pyrolysis. Despite substantial gaseous losses of C during pyrolysis, incorporating biochar in soil has been suggested as an effective long‐term option to sequester CO 2 for climate change mitigation, due to the intrinsic stability of biochar C. However, no universally applicable approach that combines biochar quality and pyrolysis yield into an overall metric of C sequestration efficiency has been suggested yet. To ensure safe environmental use of biochar in agricultural soils, the International Biochar Initiative and the European Biochar Certificate have developed guidelines on biochar quality. In both guidelines, the hydrogen‐to‐organic C (H/C org ) ratio is an important quality criterion widely used as a proxy of biochar stability, which has been recognized also in the new EU regulation 2021/2088. Here, we evaluate the biochar C sequestration efficiency from published data that comply with the biochar quality criteria in the above guidelines, which may regulate future large‐scale field application in practice. The sequestration efficiency is calculated from the fraction of biochar C remaining in soil after 100 years (F perm ) and the C‐yield of various feedstocks pyrolyzed at different temperatures. Both parameters are expressed as a function of H/C org . Combining these two metrics is relevant for assessing the mitigation potential of the biochar economy. We find that the C sequestration efficiency for stable biochar is in the range of 25%–50% of feedstock C. It depends on the type of feedstock and is in general a non‐linear function of H/C org . We suggest that for plant‐based feedstock, biochar production that achieves H/C org of 0.38–0.44, corresponding to pyrolysis temperatures of 500–550°C, is the most efficient in terms of soil carbon sequestration. Such biochars reveal an average sequestration efficiency of 41.4% (±4.5%) over 100 years.

1 January 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LELars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard
AOAnne B. Olsen
Anne B. Olsen
SPSøren O. Petersen
Søren O. Petersen