Vasiliki Tsampasian

Dr. Vasiliki Tsampasian

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 February 2024 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVasiliki Tsampasian
Vasiliki Tsampasian
Maria BäckMaria Bäck
Maria Bäck
Marco BernardiMarco Bernardi
Marco Bernardi
ECElena Cavarretta
Elena Cavarretta
MDMaciej Dębski
Maciej Dębski
VVVassilios S. Vassiliou
Vassilios S. Vassiliou
Aims: Long COVID syndrome has had a major impact on million patients’ lives worldwide. The cardiovascular system is an important aspect of this multifaceted disease that may manifest in many ways. We have hereby performed a narrative review in order to identify the extent of the cardiovascular manifestations of the Long COVID syndrome. Methods and results: An in-depth systematic search of the literature has been conducted for this narrative review. The systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases yielded 3993 articles, of which 629 underwent full-text screening. A total of 78 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis and data evaluation. The pathophysiology of the cardiovascular sequelae of Long COVID syndrome and the cardiac manifestations and complications of Long COVID syndrome are critically evaluated. In addition, potential cardiovascular risk factors are assessed, and preventive methods and treatment options are examined in this review. Conclusion: This systematic review poignantly summarizes the evidence from the available literature regarding the cardiovascular manifestations of Long COVID syndrome and reviews potential mechanistic pathways, diagnostic approaches, preventive measures, and treatment options.

12 June 2025 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pedro Marques-VidalPedro Marques-Vidal
Pedro Marques-Vidal
VTVasiliki Tsampasian
Vasiliki Tsampasian
ACAedin Cassidy
Aedin Cassidy
Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiGiuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
CCChristina Chrysohoou
Christina Chrysohoou
DPDemosthenes Panagiotakos
Demosthenes Panagiotakos
What we eat is a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, but health professionals may not have a clear understanding of the current evidence-based research to underpin eating habits and recommendations. This study aims to appraise existing evidence-based research on the importance of diet on CVD risk biomarkers, specifically, the effects of dietary patterns, specific foods, and constituents including vitamins/minerals and plant-derived bioactive compounds on CVD risk. Plant-based dietary patterns rich in minimally processed foods, vegetables, and fruits reduce CVD risk, while patterns rich in ultra-processed foods, meat, salt, sugar, and saturated fat increase risk. The Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, and vegetarian diets reduce CVD risk, while vegan diets offer no additional benefit. Low-carbohydrate diets may be beneficial, but their long-term effect remains to be confirmed. Balanced distribution of caloric intake through different meals is associated with favourable effects. Fasting (e.g. alternate-day, intermittent, time-restricted, and periodic) can reduce CVD risk but is often challenging. Moderate coffee consumption is not associated with increased risk of CVD. The consumption of one unit of alcohol/day may contribute to a reduced cardiovascular risk without presenting an unfavourable risk profile. Generally, there is no evidence that vitamin and mineral supplementation reduces CVD risk. High potassium intake is beneficial in healthy individuals, calcium or selenium supplementation shows no added benefit, and high sodium intake is detrimental. Diet is a major component of CVD prevention, and health professionals should include dietary assessment and evidence-based recommendations in their clinical practice.

6 March 2025 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
UBU Bhalraam
U Bhalraam
RVRathna B Veerni
Rathna B Veerni
SPSophie Paddock
Sophie Paddock
JMJames Meng
James Meng
MPMassimo Piepoli
Massimo Piepoli
VVVassilios S. Vassiliou
Vassilios S. Vassiliou
Aims: Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recognized for their cardiovascular benefits. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of SGLT2i on heart failure (HF) outcomes in cancer patients and survivors, focusing on HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses. Methods and results: A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase via Ovid, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to 5 June 2024, focusing on studies involving cancer patients and survivors treated with SGLT2i. The search criterion used was [(SGLT2) OR (Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) OR (canagliflozin) OR (dapagliflozin) OR (empagliflozin) OR (ertugliflozin) AND (cancer)]. The primary outcomes assessed were HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses. The search yielded 1880 studies, from which 13 studies encompassing 88 273 patients were included. SGLT2i use reduced HF hospitalizations by 51% (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, I² = 28%, P < 0.01) and new HF diagnoses by 71% (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.87, I² = 71%). Multi-variate meta-regression analysis suggested that among breast cancer populations, studies with ≥50% of patients on anthracyclines exhibited a 99% reduction in HF hospitalization risk compared with similar studies that included <50% of patients on anthracyclines (RR 0.0085, 95% CI: 0.0001–0.2645, P = 0.0081). Conclusion: SGLT2i significantly lower the risk of HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses among cancer patients and survivors, with particularly pronounced benefits in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. These findings support the need for prospective trials to further investigate the integration of SGLT2i into cancer patient management to enhance cardiovascular outcomes.

19 August 2021 in Cardiology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVasiliki Tsampasian
Vasiliki Tsampasian
RBRanu Baral
Ranu Baral
RCRahul Chattopadhyay
Rahul Chattopadhyay
MDMaciej Debski
Maciej Debski
SJShruti S Joshi
Shruti S Joshi
VVVassilios S. Vassiliou
Vassilios S. Vassiliou
Aims. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a significant prognostic benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the cardiovascular (CV) profile of patients with diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide a concise evaluation of all the available evidence for the use of these agents in patients with heart failure (HF) regardless of their baseline diabetes status. Methods and Results. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched from inception until November 20th 2020. Eight studies consisting of 13,275 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For the total population, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.83; 95 CI: 0.750.91; I2 0), hospitalisation for HF (HR: 0.68; 95 CI: 0.610.75; I2: 0), CV death (HR: 0.82; 95 CI: 0.740.92; I2: 0), and hospitalisation for HF or CV death (HR: 0.72; 95 CI: 0.660.78; I2: 0). Subgroup analyses of the total population according to the diabetes status showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of hospitalisation for HF (HR: 0.68; 95 CI: 0.61, 0.75; I2: 0), as well as the risk of hospitalisation for HF or CV death (HR: 0.72; 95 CI: 0.66, 078; I2: 0) and CV death (HR: 0.82; 95 CI: 0.74, 0.91; I2: 0). Conclusions. The results of this meta-analysis confirm the growing evidence in the literature of the favourable profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with heart failure regardless of the baseline diabetes status. This systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021224777).

26 June 2024 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVasiliki Tsampasian
Vasiliki Tsampasian
CMCristian Militaru
Cristian Militaru
SPSathish Kumar Parasuraman
Sathish Kumar Parasuraman
BLBrodie L Loudon
Brodie L Loudon
CLCrystal Lowery
Crystal Lowery
MFMichael P Frenneaux
Michael P Frenneaux
With an ageing population, the presence of asymptomatic valvular heart disease (VHD) in the community remains unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and associated factors of asymptomatic VHD in individuals ≥60 years old and to evaluate the feasibility of echocardiographic screening for VHD in this population. This was a prospective cohort study conducted between 2007 and 2016 in the UK. Asymptomatic patients with no prior indication for echocardiography were invited to participate and evaluated with a health questionnaire, clinical examination, and transthoracic echocardiography. A total of 10,000 individuals were invited through their general practices. A total of 5429 volunteered to participate, of whom 4237 were eligible for inclusion. VHD was diagnosed in more than a quarter of patients (28.2%). The most common types of VHD were regurgitation of the tricuspid (13.8%), mitral (12.8%), and aortic (8.3%) valves (trivial regurgitation was not included). The rate of prevalence of clinically significant VHD was 2.4% (2.2% moderate and 0.2% severe), with mitral and aortic regurgitation being the most common. The only parameter associated with significant VHD was age (odds ratio 1.07 per 1 year increment, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.09, P < 0.001). The number needed to scan to diagnose one clinically significant case of VHD is 42 for individuals ≥60 and 15 for those ≥75 years old. Asymptomatic VHD is present in a significant proportion of otherwise healthy individuals without known VHD over 60 years old. Age is strongly associated with an increased incidence of significant VHD.

30 November 2022 in PLOS Global Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMaciej Debski
Maciej Debski
VTVasiliki Tsampasian
Vasiliki Tsampasian
SHShawn Haney
Shawn Haney
KBKaty Blakely
Katy Blakely
SWSamantha Weston
Samantha Weston
VVVassilios S. Vassiliou
Vassilios S. Vassiliou
Post-COVID syndrome, defined as symptoms persisting for more than twelve weeks after the diagnosis of COVID-19, has been recognised as a new clinical entity in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study was conducted to characterise the burden and predictors for post-COVID-19 syndrome in the local population. It was a community-based web-survey study conducted in Norfolk, East England, UK. We sent the survey to patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction by December 6th, 2020. Questions related to the pre-COVID and post-COVID level of symptoms and further healthcare use. Baseline characteristics were collected from the primary care records. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to establish predictors for post-COVID-19 syndrome and further healthcare utilisation. Of 6,318 patients, survey responses were obtained from 1,487 participants (23.5%). Post-COVID-19 syndrome symptoms were experienced by 774 (52.1%) respondents. Male sex compared to female sex was a factor protective of post-COVID symptoms; relative risk (RR) 0.748, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.605–0.924. Body mass index was associated with a greater risk of developing post-COVID-19 symptoms (RR 1.031, 95% CI, 1.016–1.047, for 1 kg/m2). A total of 378 (25.4%) people used further health services after their index COVID-19 infection, of whom 277 (73.2%) had post-COVID symptoms. Male sex was negatively associated with the use of further health services (RR 0.618, 95% CI, 0.464–0.818) whereas BMI was positively associated (RR 1.027, 95% CI, 1.009–1.046). Overall, post-COVID-19 symptoms increased the probability of using health services with RR 3.280, 95% CI, 2.540–4.262. This survey of a large number of people previously diagnosed with COVID-19 across East England shows a high prevalence of self-reported post-COVID-19 syndrome. Female sex and BMI were associated with an increased risk of post-COVID-19 syndrome and further utilisation of healthcare.