Anna-Maija Heikkilä

Dr. Anna-Maija Heikkilä

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAnna-Maija Heikkilä
Anna-Maija Heikkilä
ELE. Liski
E. Liski
SPS. Pyörälä
S. Pyörälä
STSuvi Taponen
Suvi Taponen
Reduction in long-term milk yields represents a notable share of the economic losses caused by bovine mastitis. Efficient, economic, and safe measures to prevent these losses require knowledge of the causal agent of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate pathogen-specific impacts of mastitis on milk production of dairy cows. The materials consisted of milk and health recording data and microbiological diagnoses of mastitic quarter milk samples of 20,234 Finnish dairy cows during 2010, 2011, and 2012. The 6 most common udder pathogens were included in the study: Staphylococcus aureus, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS), Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium bovis, Streptococcus uberis, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae. We used a 2-level multilevel model to estimate curves for lactations with and without mastitis. The data on lactation periods to be compared were collected from the same cow. To enable comparison among lactations representing diverse parities, the estimated lactation curves were adjusted to describe the cow's third lactation. Mastitis caused by each pathogen resulted in milk production loss. The extent of the reduction depended on the pathogen, the timing of mastitis during lactation, and the type of mastitis (clinical vs. subclinical). The 2 most commonly detected pathogens were NAS and Staph. aureus. Escherichia coli clinical mastitis diagnosed before peak lactation caused the largest loss, 10.6% of the 305-d milk yield (3.5 kg/d). The corresponding loss for Staph. aureus mastitis was 7.1% (2.3 kg/d). In Staph. aureus mastitis diagnosed between 54 and 120 d in milk, the loss was 4.3% (1.4 kg/d). The loss was almost equal in both clinical and subclinical mastitis caused by Staph. aureus. Mastitis caused by Strep. uberis and Strep. dysgalactiae resulted in losses ranging from 3.7% (1.2 kg/d) to 6.6% (2.1 kg/d) depending on type and timing of mastitis. Clinical mastitis caused by the minor pathogens C. bovis and NAS also had a negative effect on milk production: 7.4% (2.4 kg/d) in C. bovis and 5.7% (1.8 kg/d) in NAS when both were diagnosed before peak lactation. In conclusion, minor pathogens should not be underestimated as a cause of milk yield reduction. On single dairy farms, control of E. coli mastitis would bring about a significant increase in milk production. Reducing Staph. aureus mastitis is the greatest challenge for the Finnish dairy sector.

25 May 2017 in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJohanna Vakkamäki
Johanna Vakkamäki
STSuvi Taponen
Suvi Taponen
AHAnna-Maija Heikkilä
Anna-Maija Heikkilä
SPSatu Pyörälä
Satu Pyörälä
The Finnish dairy herd recording system maintains production and health records of cows and herds. Veterinarians and farmers register veterinary treatments in the system. Milk samples for microbiological analysis are routinely taken from mastitic cows. The laboratory of the largest dairy company in Finland, Valio Ltd., analyzes most samples using real-time PCR. This study addressed pathogen-specific microbiological data and treatment and culling records, in combination with cow and herd characteristics, from the Finnish dairy herd recording system during 2010–2012. The data derived from 240,067 quarter milk samples from 93,529 dairy cows with mastitis; 238,235 cows from the same herds served as the control group. No target pathogen DNA was detected in 12% of the samples. In 49% of the positive samples, only one target species and in 19%, two species with one dominant species were present. The most common species in the samples with a single species only were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (43%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (21%), Streptococcus uberis (9%), Streptococcus dysgalactiae (8%), Corynebacterium bovis (7%), and Escherichia coli (5%). On average, 36% of the study cows and 6% of the control cows had recorded mastitis treatments during lactation. The corresponding proportions were 16 and 6% at drying-off. For more than 75% of the treatments during lactation, diagnosis was acute clinical mastitis. In the milk samples from cows with a recorded mastitis treatment during lactation, CNS and S. aureus were most common, followed by streptococci. Altogether, 48% of the cows were culled during the study. Mastitis was reported as the most common reason to cull; 49% of study cows and 18% of control cows were culled because of mastitis. Culling was most likely if S. aureus was detected in the milk sample submitted during the culling year. The PCR test has proven to be an applicable method also for large-scale use in bacterial diagnostics. In the present study, microbiological diagnosis was unequivocal in the great majority of samples where a single species or two species with one dominating were detected. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and S. aureus were the most common species. S. aureus was also the most common pathogen among the culled cows, which emphasizes the importance of preventive measures.

13 May 2020 in Agricultural and Food Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAnna-Maija Heikkilä
Anna-Maija Heikkilä