Assessing the radon activity that exhales from building structures is crucial to identify the best strategies to prevent radon from entering a building or reducing its concentration in the inhabited spaces. The direct measurement is extremely difficult, so the common approach has consisted in developing models describing the radon migration and exhalation phenomena for building porous materials. However, due to the mathematical complexity of comprehensively modelling the radon transport phenomenon in buildings, simplified equations have been mostly adopted until now to assess the radon exhalation. A systematic analysis of the models applicable to radon transport has been carried out and it has resulted in four models differing in the migration mechanisms - only diffusive or diffusive and advective - and the presence of inner radon generation. The general solutions have been obtained for all the models. Moreover, three case-specific sets of boundary conditions have been formulated to account for all the actual scenarios occurring in buildings: both perimetral and partition walls and building structures in direct contact with soil or embankments. The corresponding case-specific solutions obtained serve as a key practical tool to improve the accuracy in assessing the contribution of building materials to indoor radon concentration according to the site-specific installation conditions in addition to the material inner properties.

Since 2013, the Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom has been regulating the content of radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption. However, mineral waters are exempted from this regulation, including self-bottled springs waters, where higher radon concentration are expected. Therefore, a systematic survey has been conducted on all the 33 mineral spring waters of Lazio (a region of Central Italy) in order to assess if such waters, when self-bottled, may be of concern for public health. Waters have been sampled in two different ways to evaluate the impact of bottling on radon concentration. Water sampling was possible for 20 different spring waters, with 6 samples for each one. The results show that 2 (10%) of measured mineral spring waters returned radon concentrations higher than 100 Bq L⁻¹, i.e., the parametric value established by the Council Directive. These results, if confirmed by other surveys involving a higher number of mineral spring waters, would suggest regulating also these waters, especially in countries like Italy for which: (i) mineral water consumption is significant; (ii) mineral concession owners generally allow the consumers to fill bottles and containers, intended for transport and subsequent consumption, directly from public fountains or from fountains within the plant; (iii) the consumers’ habit of drinking self-bottled mineral water is widespread.

Indoor radon levels in dwellings are typically higher in cold months than in warm ones. The indoor radon concentration might experience an inverse seasonal behaviour - i.e., radon levels much higher in summer than in winter - under specific circumstances. In the framework of a study on long-term variations of annual radon concentration carried out in some tens of dwellings in Rome and surrounding small towns, two dwellings with very high - up to extreme - reverse seasonal variations were accidently discovered. These dwellings were located in a volcanic area, and they are both south-oriented and located on the lower part of a hill. In one of them, radon concentration was monitored by a continuous radon monitor for two years to find out when the greatest rises in radon levels occur. The indoor radon concentration resulted to experience extremely rapid, i.e. very few hours, increases up to 20 000 Bq m^-3 during the spring period (i.e., April, May, and June especially). After about ten years from the first observation, the indoor radon concentration of the same house was monitored again for about five years: radon concentration peaks previously observed were found to be unchanged in terms of absolute values, duration, rising time and occurrence period. These reverse seasonal variations may lead to significant underestimation of the actual annual average radon concentration in case of measurements lasting less than one year if performed during the cold season and especially when seasonal correction factors are used. Moreover, these results suggest adopting specific measurement protocol and remediation strategies in houses having some peculiar characteristics, mainly regarding orientation, position, and attachment to the ground.

The performance of continuous radon monitors (CRMs) is usually evaluated under controlled conditions in a radon chamber during calibrations or intercomparison exercises. The impact of thoron on CRMs response is rarely evaluated; in case the evaluation is performed, it is carried out in a controlled atmosphere with relatively constant, homogeneous, and generally high thoron concentrations and very low radon levels. In a real indoor environment, both radon and thoron concentrations are extremely variable, so the thoron interference evaluations reported in the literature are generally not applicable to CRMs used to measure radon concentration indoors. For this reason, an experimental study was carried out with four different CRMs in an indoor environment (an office room) where medium-to-high concentrations of both radon and thoron were expected. Thoron concentration has been separately evaluated throughout two different active monitors. Three CRMs resulted in overestimations of radon concentration by about 10% due to thoron interference, whereas such interference results were negligible for the fourth CRM. However, the thoron interference can also be used to assess thoron concentration by using CRM not specifically designed to do so. Based on the results of this study, an indirect method to assess thoron concentration is indeed proposed, relying on the combination of two identical monitors (one placed right close to the wall and the other one far enough from there).

Population exposure to indoor radon has been proven to increase the risk of lung cancer, and it is considered a leading cause after tobacco smoking. Due to the relatively low outdoor activity concentration, most of the exposure to radon occurs indoors. Radon is generated mostly by the rocks that contain radium-226 either in the soil or in the building materials. Once generated, it enters the buildings directly, due to the activity concentration gradient, or indirectly via a radon carrier. The magnitude and the relative contribution of the entry patterns depend mainly on the building characteristics, the geology, and the living habits of occupants.

Electrostatic precipitation is a well-known technology to reduce public exposure to radon daughters. A custom electrostatic precipitator (ESP) prototype has been designed and built to study the effectiveness of such a removal technique in specific workplaces having low-to-zero air exchange rates with external environments. An appropriate mathematical model has been set up in order to simulate the behavior of environmental and nuclear data throughout the ESP operation, to optimize the design for the prototype to be built, to estimate its effectiveness in terms of effective dose reduction. Reference detectors have been used to measure both the radon concentration and the potential alpha energy concentration of its decay products. After a full calibration procedure, two main experiments have been performed in a room satisfying the requirements of very low ventilation rate and high radon concentration. The effective dose rate after an ESP continuous working period of either 3 h or 5 h turned out to be 50% lower than the value measured before ESP switching ON. The main contribution to dose reduction was found to be given by the first 2 hours of operation.