Charlotte  Sherlaw-Sturrock

Dr. Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 July 2022 in European Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHelen McDermott
Helen McDermott
CSCharlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
JBJulia Baptista
Julia Baptista
LHLorraine Hartles-Spencer
Lorraine Hartles-Spencer
SNSwati Naik
Swati Naik

29 January 2023 in European Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAsma Hamad
Asma Hamad
CSCharlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
KGKate Glover
Kate Glover
RSRachel Salmon
Rachel Salmon
KLKaren Low
Karen Low
SNSwati Naik
Swati Naik

17 May 2022 in European Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCharlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
TAThomas Austin
Thomas Austin
JBJulia Baptista
Julia Baptista
KGKimberly Gilmour
Kimberly Gilmour
SNSwati Naik
Swati Naik

14 June 2022 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCharlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
TWTracey Willis
Tracey Willis
NKNigel Kiely
Nigel Kiely
GHGunnar Houge
Gunnar Houge
JVJulie Vogt
Julie Vogt

21 May 2025 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESErina Sasaki
Erina Sasaki
PMPhilip Millington
Philip Millington
TSTaisiia Sazonova
Taisiia Sazonova
LHLucy Hanington
Lucy Hanington
APAndrew Parrish
Andrew Parrish
UKUsha Kini
Usha Kini
About 30% of epilepsy patients remain unresponsive to standard antiseizure treatment. Increasing evidence suggests that genetic epilepsies may respond better to targeted management. In this study, we therefore evaluate the therapeutic benefits of rapid genetic testing in children with severe epilepsy. Methods: the clinical data of patients with epilepsy referred for rapid whole-exome sequencing were systematically collected at two large paediatric/neurogenetic centres (Birmingham/Oxford) in the United Kingdom over 3 years (2019–2022), with follow-up at 12 months post-diagnosis. The demographics, diagnostic yield, management by gene function and seizure group (SZ-seizures only or SZ+ seizures with co-morbidities) were explored. Results: among the 106 eligible patients, the age at testing ranged from 0 to 16 years with a median of 7 months. Underserved ethnic groups, e.g., British Asians and Black British, were well-represented. Thirty-nine genes affecting 49 patients were identified, giving an overall diagnostic yield of 46%, which was further enhanced to 51% (31/61) in the SZ+ group. Twenty percent of genes identified affect ion channels and patients were more likely to present early (<6 months old) and respond to a gene-directed treatment (p = 0.004483). Seizures secondary to metabolic disorders responded to bespoke therapy. A fifth (22/106) of tested patients and 45% (22/49) of those diagnosed had their management impacted. At the 12-month follow-up, 9/15 (60%) patients remained seizure-free following gene-targeted management. Conclusion: this study demonstrates high diagnostic yield and significant therapeutic benefit from rapid genetic testing in patients with epilepsy. The gene function categories were statistically significant predictors of management change.

10 September 2025 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
KTKaima Tsukada
Kaima Tsukada
LLLiudmyla Lototska
Liudmyla Lototska
ATAya Tsukada
Aya Tsukada
IGIpek Ilgin Gönenç
Ipek Ilgin Gönenç
CSCharlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
Charlotte Sherlaw-Sturrock
ABAndrew N. Blackford
Andrew N. Blackford
SUMMARY: DNA double-strand breaks and unresolved DNA replication intermediates are particularly dangerous during mitosis. Paradoxically, cells inactivate canonical DNA repair mechanisms during chromosome segregation in favor of alternative pathways that depend on TOPBP1 and CIP2A, but how they function is still poorly defined. Here, we describe the identification of DDIAS as a mitosis-specific DNA damage response protein. We establish DDIAS as a phosphorylation-dependent component and effector of the TOPBP1-CIP2A complex with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding activity, and thereby delineate a ssDNA protection mechanism that safeguards chromosome integrity during mitosis, particularly in BRCA-deficient cells. We also identify biallelic inactivating mutations in DDIAS and CIP2A in patients with severe neurodevelopmental phenotypes. These findings highlight the physiological importance of the DNA damage response in mitosis, and may open new avenues for synthetic-lethal therapy in BRCA-deficient cancers.