Denis BAURAIN

Prof. Denis BAURAIN

InBioS-PhytoSYSTEMS, Eukaryotic Phylogenomics, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2011 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HPHervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe
HBHenner Brinkmann
Henner Brinkmann
DLDennis V Lavrov
Dennis V Lavrov
DLD Timothy J Littlewood
D Timothy J Littlewood
MMMichael Manuel
Michael Manuel
DBDenis BAURAIN
Denis BAURAIN

17 April 2013 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAChris Amemiya
Chris Amemiya
JAJessica Alföldi
Jessica Alföldi
ALAlison P. Lee
Alison P. Lee
SFShaohua Fan
Shaohua Fan
HPHervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe
KLKerstin Lindblad-Toh
Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
The discovery of a living coelacanth specimen in 1938 was remarkable, as this lineage of lobe-finned fish was thought to have become extinct 70 million years ago. The modern coelacanth looks remarkably similar to many of its ancient relatives, and its evolutionary proximity to our own fish ancestors provides a glimpse of the fish that first walked on land. Here we report the genome sequence of the African coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. Through a phylogenomic analysis, we conclude that the lungfish, and not the coelacanth, is the closest living relative of tetrapods. Coelacanth protein-coding genes are significantly more slowly evolving than those of tetrapods, unlike other genomic features. Analyses of changes in genes and regulatory elements during the vertebrate adaptation to land highlight genes involved in immunity, nitrogen excretion and the development of fins, tail, ear, eye, brain and olfaction. Functional assays of enhancers involved in the fin-to-limb transition and in the emergence of extra-embryonic tissues show the importance of the coelacanth genome as a blueprint for understanding tetrapod evolution.

1 April 2017 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPaul Simion
Paul Simion
HPHervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe
DBDenis BAURAIN
Denis BAURAIN
MJMuriel Jager
Muriel Jager
DRDaniel J. Richter
Daniel J. Richter
MMMichaël Manuel
Michaël Manuel

28 August 2012 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BRBéatrice Roure
Béatrice Roure
DBDenis BAURAIN
Denis BAURAIN
HPHervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe
Progress in sequencing technology allows researchers to assemble ever-larger supermatrices for phylogenomic inference. However, current phylogenomic studies often rest on patchy data sets, with some having 80% missing (or ambiguous) data or more. Though early simulations had suggested that missing data per se do not harm phylogenetic inference when using sufficiently large data sets, Lemmon et al. (Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol. 58:130-145.) have recently cast doubt on this consensus in a study based on the introduction of parsimony-uninformative incomplete characters. In this work, we empirically reassess the issue of missing data in phylogenomics while exploring possible interactions with the model of sequence evolution. First, we note that parsimony-uninformative incomplete characters are actually informative in a probabilistic framework. A reanalysis of Lemmon's data set with this in mind gives a very different interpretation of their results and shows that some of their conclusions may be unfounded. Second, we investigate the effect of the progressive introduction of missing data in a complete supermatrix (126 genes × 39 species) capable of resolving animal relationships. These analyses demonstrate that missing data perturb phylogenetic inference slightly beyond the expected decrease in resolving power. In particular, they exacerbate systematic errors by reducing the number of species effectively available for the detection of multiple substitutions. Consequently, large sparse supermatrices are more sensitive to phylogenetic artifacts than smaller but less incomplete data sets, which argue for experimental designs aimed at collecting a modest number (~50) of highly covered genes. Our results further confirm that including incomplete yet short-branch taxa (i.e., slowly evolving species or close outgroups) can help to eschew artifacts, as predicted by simulations. Finally, it appears that selecting an adequate model of sequence evolution (e.g., the site-heterogeneous CAT model instead of the site-homogeneous WAG model) is more beneficial to phylogenetic accuracy than reducing the level of missing data.

24 July 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IIIker Irisarri
Iker Irisarri
DBDenis BAURAIN
Denis BAURAIN
HBHenner Brinkmann
Henner Brinkmann
FDFrédéric Delsuc
Frédéric Delsuc
JSJean-Yves Sire
Jean-Yves Sire
HPHervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe
Phylogenomics is extremely powerful but introduces new challenges as no agreement exists on ‘standards’ for data selection, curation and tree inference. We use jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata) as a model to address these issues. Despite considerable efforts in resolving their evolutionary history and macroevolution, few studies have included a full phylogenetic diversity of gnathostomes, and some relationships remain controversial. We tested a new bioinformatic pipeline to assemble large and accurate phylogenomic datasets from RNA sequencing and found this phylotranscriptomic approach to be successful and highly cost-effective. Increased sequencing effort up to about 10 Gbp allows more genes to be recovered, but shallower sequencing (1.5 Gbp) is sufficient to obtain thousands of full-length orthologous transcripts. We reconstruct a robust and strongly supported timetree of jawed vertebrates using 7,189 nuclear genes from 100 taxa, including 23 new transcriptomes from previously unsampled key species. Gene jackknifing of genomic data corroborates the robustness of our tree and allows calculating genome-wide divergence times by overcoming gene sampling bias. Mitochondrial genomes prove insufficient to resolve the deepest relationships because of limited signal and among-lineage rate heterogeneity. Our analyses emphasize the importance of large, curated, nuclear datasets to increase the accuracy of phylogenomics and provide a reference framework for the evolutionary history of jawed vertebrates.

24 April 2011 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKLatifa Karim
Latifa Karim
HTHaruko Takeda
Haruko Takeda
LLLi Lin
Li Lin
TDTom Druet
Tom Druet
JAJuan A C Arias
Juan A C Arias
WCWouter Coppieters
Wouter Coppieters