Biomarkers are valuable tools in clinical practice. In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) standardized the definition of a biomarker as a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. A biomarker has clinical relevance when it presents precision, standardization and reproducibility, suitability to the patient, straightforward interpretation by clinicians, and high sensitivity and/or specificity by the parameter it proposes to identify. Thus, serum biomarkers should have advantages related to the simplicity of the procedures and to the fact that venous blood collection is commonplace in clinical practice. We described the potentiality of cfDNA as a general clinical biomarker and focused on endothelial dysfunction. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to extracellular DNA present in body fluid that may be derived from both normal and diseased cells. An increasing number of studies demonstrate the potential use of cfDNA as a noninvasive biomarker to determine physiologic and pathologic conditions. However, although still scarce, increasing evidence has been reported regarding using cfDNA in cardiovascular diseases. Here, we have reviewed the history of cfDNA, its source, molecular features, and release mechanism. We also show recent studies that have investigated cfDNA as a possible marker of endothelial damage in clinical settings. In the cardiovascular system, the studies are quite new, and although interesting, stronger evidence is still needed. However, some drawbacks in cfDNA methodologies should be overcome before its recommendation as a biomarker in the clinical setting.

Sepsis continues to be a significant public health challenge despite advances in understanding its pathophysiology and management strategies. Therefore, this study evaluated the value of cell-free nuclear DNA (cf-nDNA) and cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) for assessing the severity and prognosis of sepsis. Ninety-four patients were divided into three groups: infection (n = 32), sepsis (n = 30), and septic shock (n = 32). Plasma samples were collected at the time of diagnosis, and cfDNA concentrations were determined by qPCR assay. The results showed that plasma cfDNA levels increased with the severity of the disease. To distinguish between patients with infection and those with sepsis, the biomarker L1PA2₉₀ achieved the highest AUC of 0.817 (95% CI: 0.725–0.909), demonstrating a sensitivity of 77.0% and a specificity of 79.3%. When cf-nDNA was combined with the SOFA score, there was a significant improvement in the AUC (0.916 (0.853–0.979)), sensitivity (88.1%), and specificity (80.0%). Moreover, patients admitted to the ICU after being diagnosed with sepsis had significantly higher cf-nDNA concentrations. In patients admitted to the ICU, combining cf-nDNA with the SOFA score yielded an AUC of 0.753 (0.622–0.857), with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 50.0%. cfDNA can differentiate between patients with infection and those with sepsis. It can also identify patients who are likely to be admitted to the ICU by predicting those with indications for intensive care, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for sepsis.

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women around the world. The basal or triple-negative subtype (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors, characterized by its aggressive and metastatic nature, with low survival and worse prognosis. Research on genetic biomarkers, such as microRNAs (miRs) in TNBC, demonstrate their relevance in the prognosis of the disease. Therefore, the objective of this research was to verify the role of miRs in the prognosis of TNBC. A search was carried out in the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Scopus databases, with articles in the English language from 2010 to 2022. Only articles that analyzed the role of miRNAs in the prognosis of TNBC and that met the criteria of the MOOSE method were included. For the preparation and planning of this systematic review, a PRISMA checklist and the MOOSE method were used. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to analyze the quality of the included studies. The excluded criteria considered were: (1) studies that presented duplication in the databases; (2) reviews of the literature, clinical case reports, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters to the editor, theses, dissertations, and book chapters; (3) studies that stratified only women diagnosed with other subtypes of breast cancer subtypes; (4) experiments without a control or comparison group. After the bibliographic survey of the 2.274 articles found, 43 articles met the inclusion criteria, totaling 5421 patients with TNBC analyzed for this review. Six miRs (miR-155, miR-21, miR-27a/b/, miR-374a/b, miR-30a/c/e, and miR-301a) were included in the meta-analysis. A low expression of miR-155 was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58–0.81). A high expression of miR-21 was a predictor of OS reduction (HR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.49–4.40). In addition, high levels of miR-27a/b and miR-301a/b were associated with lower OS, while the decreased expression levels of miR-30 and miR-374a/b were associated with worse relapse-free survival (RFS) and shorter disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. The present study revealed that miRs play essential roles in the development of metastases, in addition to acting as suppressors of the disease, thus improving the prognosis of TNBC. However, the clinical application of these findings has not yet been investigated.

This work aimed at evaluating the bacteriological, parasitological, physical and chemical quality of water intended for human consumption in a community in a rural area of Recôncavo of Bahia (Brazil) and the factors related to a possible contamination. Samples were collected at two different times: at rainy season (August to September, 2015) and dry season (April 2016). The present work evaluated the presence of total coliforms and Escherichia coli; quantified heterotrophic bacteria; performed parasitological techniques of direct examination and modified Faust; analyzed pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, apparent color, turbidity and salinity; and applied a questionnaire regarding the water source and its storage. Out of the 53 households, 67.9% were in disagreement with bacteriological standards of potability. 5.7% in disagreement with parasitological standards, 92.5% in disagreement with physical and chemical standards and all samples were in disagreement with the parameters allowed and recommended by the Brazilian legislation. The water source, presence of a household reservoir, sewage destination and reservoir cleaning time were significantly related to the bacteriological results. The consumption of this water poses a risk to the population’s health and it could provoke outbreaks of food borne diseases. Effective water treatment and surveillance measurements should be taken in order to minimize risks to human health. Key words: Potable standards, groundwater, indicator microorganisms, contaminated water.