Background: Zygomatico-maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are prevalent facial injuries with significant functional and aesthetic implications. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) offers precise surgical planning and outcome evaluation. The study aimed to evaluate the application of CAS in the analysis of ZMC fracture outcomes and to propose a reproducible workflow for surgical outcome assessment using cephalometric landmarks. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 16 patients treated for unilateral ZMC fractures at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of Siena University Hospital (2017–2024). Inclusion criteria included ZMC fractures classified as Zingg B or C, treated via open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Pre- and post-operative CT scans were processed for two- and three-dimensional analyses. Discrepancies between CAS-optimized reduction and achieved surgical outcomes were quantified using cephalometric landmarks and volumetric assessments. Results: Out of the 16 patients (69% male, mean age 48.1 years), fractures were predominantly on the right side (81%). CAS comparison between the post-operative and the contralateral side revealed significant asymmetries along the X and Y axes, particularly in the fronto-zygomatic suture (FZS), zygo-maxillary point (MP), and zygo-temporal point (ZT). Computer-assisted comparison between the post-operative and the CAS-simulated reductions showed statistical differences along all three orthonormal axes, highlighting the challenges in achieving ideal symmetry despite advanced surgical techniques. CAS-optimized reductions demonstrated measurable improvements compared to traditional methods, underscoring their utility in outcome evaluation. Conclusions: CAS technology enhances the precision of ZMC fracture outcome evaluation, allowing for detailed comparison between surgical outcomes and virtual simulations. Its application underscores the potential for improved surgical planning and execution, especially in complex cases. Future studies should focus on expanding sample size, refining workflows, and integrating artificial intelligence to automate processes for broader clinical applicability.

Introduction: This manuscript addresses the limitations of traditional orthognathic surgery in achieving both functional and aesthetic correction in patients with Class II malocclusion and severe mandibular retrusion. Current techniques often struggle to simultaneously address mandibular deficiency and inadequate transverse dimension, leading to unsatisfactory outcomes. Methods: Seven male patients underwent bimaxillary osteotomy with mandibular advancement. A novel surgical plate, Implate, was used, which was designed to facilitate precise osteotomy and stabilization. Pre-surgical planning included CBCT scanning, 3D modeling, and surgical simulation. Postoperative assessments included clinical examinations, CT and OPT scans. Results: Implate successfully addressed the challenges of conventional techniques, minimizing the formation of bony steps and achieving a more harmonious facial profile. The minimally invasive procedure, with careful periosteal and muscle management, contributed to stable outcomes, and no complications were reported. At the 6-month follow-up, OPT analysis showed a mean mandibular width increase of 18.1 ± 6.2 mm and vertical ramus height gains of 6.0 ± 3.1 mm (left) and 5.8 ± 1.7 mm (right). Conclusions: According to our preliminary experience, the integration of Implate into surgical practice offers a significant improvement in treating complex Class II malocclusions. By simultaneously correcting mandibular retrusion and width while minimizing complications, Implate provides a superior solution compared to traditional methods. This innovative approach highlights the potential of combining advanced surgical techniques with personalized 3D-printed implants to achieve optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes. Further prospective studies with controls and longer follow-up are needed to validate the efficacy and reproducibility of Implate in wider clinical use.

Article: Comparison of RFF and ALT flap in head and neck reconstruction: one single center experience - Chirurgia 2023 August;36(4):196-203 - Minerva Medica - Journals