The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were identified in which the implant had to be removed. Of the 47 cases, 57.4% had undergone deferred reconstruction, and 42.6% immediate reconstruction; 27.7% had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 27.7% pre-operative chemotherapy, and 2.1% pre-operative radiotherapy; 6.4% were diabetic, 4.3% active smokers, and more than 50.0% had BMI greater than 25 kg/m². In 83.0% of the analyzed cases, the reason for removal of the implant was infection, in 8.5% it was local recurrence of breast cancer, in 4.3% it was damage (leakage) of the implant, and in 2.1% it was post-operative pain. About 87.0% of infections appeared within one year of implantation; however, less than a half developed within 90 days of the reconstructive surgery, and up to 30 days only about 13.0% had appeared. Among the etiological agents of infections were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (31.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (3.1%), and other Gram-negative fermenting rods accounted for 6.2%. Infections were the most common reason for removing the implant after breast reconstruction. and occurred most often as late infections (>30 days after surgery). The time of observation for infectious complications should be at least 1 year.

Invasive Candida glabrata infections are not common complications after radical cystoprostatectomy. Furthermore, resistance to echinocandins arising during the course of a patient’s treatment is rarely recognised. We described a case of development of echinocandin resistance in a patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2b N0 M0, high grade) diagnosis, subjected to radical cystoprostatectomy and exposed to echinocandins. A male patient with a previous surgical history after a traffic accident, who was operated on due to bladder cancer, underwent an episode of candidemia and mixed postoperative wound and urinary tract infection caused by C. glabrata and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli during hospital treatment. The patient was started on caspofungin. Repeat blood cultures showed clearance of the bloodstream infection; however, infection persisted at the surgical site. Resistance to echinocandins developed within 2 months from the day of initiation of therapy with caspofungin in the C. glabrata strain obtained from the surgical site. The isolates sequentially obtained during the patient’s treatment demonstrated resistance to echinocandins due to the mutation in hotspot 1 FKS2. Although resistance to echinocandins is relatively rare, it should be considered in oncological patients with increased complexity of treatment and intestinal surgery.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed type of cancer in women worldwide. Both the development and progression of breast cancer are related to tumour evasion of the immune system through a process called cancer immune-editing, in which regulatory lymphocytes play an important role. The...

Objectives The aim of our study has been to determine the association between the appearance of infection after modified posterior pelvic exenteration (MPE) and TTC (time to adjuvant chemotherapy) and to examine whether the infection impacts clinical results by delaying the start of chemotherapy. Material and methods The present, retrospective study analyzed 77 patients who had undergone MPE followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Either no residual tumor or tumor less than 2.5 mm was achieved in 76.7% of these patients. Patients were divided into two subgroups for comparison; the first group consisted of 41 patients with infections, the second group of 36 patients without infections. Infection after surgery was monitored within a 90-day postoperative period. Median TTC and OS (overall survival) was determined for those patients who developed infection as well as for those who did not. Results The expected 5-year survival rate was 0.40 (SD=0.09) for those patients without infection and 0.17 (SD=0.07) for those patients with infection. The survival curves of patients with infection and those without infection were statistically significantly different (p=0.038). Median TTC differed significantly for those patients who developed infection vs those patients who did not develop infection (37days vs 27.5 days, p=0.024), and patients without infection were statistically more likely to receive chemotherapy within 25 days following surgery than in the subsequent 25-42-day period compared to those patients who did develop infection (p=0.048). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in relation to the initiation of chemotherapy within 42 days (p=0.445). Conclusions The absence of postoperative infection was associated with a better survival. Patients with infection were noted a longer time interval from surgery to start of chemotherapy without negative impact to OS. Objectives The aim of our study has been to determine the association between the appearance of infection after modified posterior pelvic exenteration (MPE) and TTC (time to adjuvant chemotherapy) and to examine whether the infection impacts clinical results by delaying the start of chemotherapy. Material and methods The present, retrospective study analyzed 77 patients who had undergone MPE followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Either no residual tumor or tumor less than 2.5 mm was achieved in 76.7% of these patients. Patients were divided into two subgroups for comparison; the first group consisted of 41 patients with infections, the second group of 36 patients without infections. Infection after surgery was monitored within a 90-day postoperative period. Median TTC and OS (overall survival) was determined for those patients who developed infection as well as for those who did not. Results The expected 5-year survival rate was 0.40 (SD=0.09) for those patients without infection and 0.17 (SD=0.07) for those patients with infection. The survival curves of patients with infection and those without infection were statistically significantly different (p=0.038). Median TTC differed significantly for those patients who developed infection vs those patients who did not develop infection (37days vs 27.5 days, p=0.024), and patients without infection were statistically more likely to receive chemotherapy within 25 days following surgery than in the subsequent 25-42-day period compared to those patients who did develop infection (p=0.048). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in relation to the initiation of chemotherapy within 42 days (p=0.445). Conclusions The absence of postoperative infection was associated with a better survival. Patients with infection were noted a longer time interval from surgery to start of chemotherapy without negative impact to OS.

Conventional methods used to determine pneumonia pathogens are characterized by low sensitivity and long turnaround times. Introducing new tests with better parameters in patients at higher risk of infections is highly anticipated. The results of the conventional quantitative culture method (CM) in determining the bacterial etiology of pneumonia were compared with the results of the Pneumonia plus Panel test (PNP; BioFire® Diagnostics, USA) in 79 samples of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Materials were collected from 79 patients with suspected pneumonia treated in an oncologic hospital due to solid tumors. Only 16/79 BAL samples (20.3%) were true positive (TP) for bacterial etiology in CM vs. 27/79 samples (34.2%) true positive in the PNP test. The total agreement between methods of interpreting the result (positive or negative) was 84.8%. The most prevalent pathogens in both methods were Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae. The PNP test identified several respiratory pathogens that were not grown in culture. The semiquantitative value reported by the PNP test was higher than that reported by culture. The PNP test vs. combined test (PNP test and CM methods) demonstrated positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) values of 100.0% and 98.1%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 96.4% and 100.0%. The PNP test is a good tool for determining the etiology of bacterial pneumonia and may support the care of an oncologic patient. However, further large-sample studies are needed to research in strictly defined groups of oncologic patients.