Richard Chbeir

Prof. Dr. Richard Chbeir

E2S UPPA / LIUPPA, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, 64600 Anglet, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2010
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
ERElie Raad
Elie Raad
Richard ChbeirRichard Chbeir
Richard Chbeir
ADAlbert Dipanda
Albert Dipanda
Inter-social networks operations and functionalities are required in several scenarios (data integration, data enrichment, information retrieval, etc.). To achieve this, matching user profiles is required. Current methods are so restrictive and do not consider all the related problems. Particularly, they assume that two profiles describe the same physical person only if the values of their Inverse Functional Property or IFP (e.g. the email address, homepage, etc.) are the same. However, the observed trend in social networks is not fully compatible with this assumption since users tend to create more than one social network account (for personal use, for work, etc.) while using same or different email addresses. In this work, we address the problem of matching user profiles in its globality by providing a suitable matching framework able to consider all the profile's attributes. Our framework allows users to give more importance to some attributes and assign each attribute a different similarity measure. The set of experiments conducted with our default/recommended attribute/similarity measures shows the superiority of our proposal in comparison with current ones.

1 August 2009 in Computer Science Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJoe Tekli
Joe Tekli
Richard ChbeirRichard Chbeir
Richard Chbeir
KYKokou Yetongnon
Kokou Yetongnon

1 February 2018 in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJoe Tekli
Joe Tekli
YIYoussef Bou Issa
Youssef Bou Issa
Richard ChbeirRichard Chbeir
Richard Chbeir

24 February 2011 in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJoe Tekli
Joe Tekli
Ernesto DamianiErnesto Damiani
Ernesto Damiani
Richard ChbeirRichard Chbeir
Richard Chbeir
Gabriele GianiniGabriele Gianini
Gabriele Gianini
The web services (WS) technology provides a comprehensive solution for representing, discovering, and invoking services in a wide variety of environments, including Service Oriented Architectures (SOA ) and grid computing systems. At the core of WS technology lie a number of XML-based standards, such as the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), that have successfully ensured WS extensibility, transparency, and interoperability. Nonetheless, there is an increasing demand to enhance WS performance, which is severely impaired by XML's verbosity. SOAP communications produce considerable network traffic, making them unfit for distributed, loosely coupled, and heterogeneous computing environments such as the open Internet. Also, they introduce higher latency and processing delays than other technologies, like Java RMI and CORBA. WS research has recently focused on SOAP performance enhancement. Many approaches build on the observation that SOAP message exchange usually involves highly similar messages (those created by the same implementation usually have the same structure, and those sent from a server to multiple clients tend to show similarities in structure and content). Similarity evaluation and differential encoding have thus emerged as SOAP performance enhancement techniques. The main idea is to identify the common parts of SOAP messages, to be processed only once, avoiding a large amount of overhead. Other approaches investigate nontraditional processor architectures, including micro- and macrolevel parallel processing solutions, so as to further increase the processing rates of SOAP/XML software toolkits. This survey paper provides a concise, yet comprehensive review of the research efforts aimed at SOAP performance enhancement. A unified view of the problem is provided, covering almost every phase of SOAP processing, ranging over message parsing, serialization, deserialization, compression, multicasting, security evaluation, and data/instruction-level processing.

1 September 2018 in Data & Knowledge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJoe Tekli
Joe Tekli
Richard ChbeirRichard Chbeir
Richard Chbeir
ATAgma J.M. Traina
Agma J.M. Traina
CTCaetano Traina
Caetano Traina
KYKokou Yetongnon
Kokou Yetongnon
CKChristian Kallas
Christian Kallas