Background: Mounting evidence has shown that systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), a novel prognostic biomarker based on peripheral lymphocyte, neutrophil and monocyte counts, is associated with poor prognosis for several tumors. However, the prognostic value of SIRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is elusive. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between SIRI and clinical outcomes in these patients. Methods: A total of 194 consecutive patients who underwent TACE were included in this study. Patients were stratified into high and low SIRI groups based on the cut-off value using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent risk factors for tumor response were analyzed using forward stepwise logistic regression. A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between low and high SIRI patients. The discriminatory power of the combination of number of tumors and SIRI in predicting initial TACE response was evaluated by ROC analysis. Results: Patients were divided into high SIRI (> 0.88) and low SIRI (≤ 0.88) groups. High SIRI (p = 0.003) and more than three tumors (p = 0.002) were significantly related to poorer tumor response. Moreover, the low SIRI group had longer PFS and OS than the high SIRI group (both P < 0.05) before and after PSM. Combination of SIRI and number of tumors can improve the predictive ability to predict initial TACE response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.678. Conclusion: Pretreatment peripheral blood SIRI was found to be an independent predictor of tumor response and clinical outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Patients with high SIRI may have a poor prognosis.

Purpose: Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death, and metastasis is a crucial determinant of increased cancer mortality. DDX24 has garnered increased attention due to its correlation with tumorigenesis and malignant progression. However, the correlation between DDX24 and NSCLC remains unclear.Methods: DDX24 expression in NSCLC tissues and survival rate of patients was analyzed using bioinformatic analysis. Transwell assays, wound‐healing assays, and tail vein lung colonization models were employed to determine the role of DDX24 in migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo. We searched for DDX24‐interacting proteins using co‐immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectroscopy and verified the interaction. The influence of DDX24 on RPL5 expression and ubiquitination was examined using protein stability assays.Results: DDX24 expression was upregulated in NSCLC cell lines and tumors of patients, particularly those with high tumor grades. A high DDX24 level was also correlated with a poor prognosis. DDX24 upregulation enhanced the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells, whereas its downregulation had the opposite effects. In vivo xenograft experiments confirmed that tumors with high DDX24 expression had higher metastatic abilities. The interaction between DDX24 and RPL5 promoted its ubiquitination and destabilized it.Conclusions: DDX24 acted as a pro‐tumorigenic factor and promoted metastasis in NSCLC. DDX24 interacted with RPL5 to promote its ubiquitination and degradation. As a result, targeting DDX24/RPL5 axis may provide a novel potential therapeutic strategy for NSCLC.

Objective: To investigate the sustained release of lidocaine from a lidocaine–epirubicin–lipiodol emulsion created by water-in-oil (W/O) technique in vivo and evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraarterial lidocaine administration for intra- and postoperative pain control in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The in vivo concentrations of lidocaine were determined in tumor tissues after VX2 rabbit models for hepatic tumor were administered with intra-arterial lidocaine–epirubicin–lipiodol emulsion. A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was performed, enrolling 70 consecutive patients who underwent TACE. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A received an immediate bolus intraarterial lidocaine injection before TACE, and Group B received a lidocaine–epirubicin–lipiodol emulsion during TACE. Pain intensity was compared between the two groups using a visual analog scale (VAS) score before (T_before) and at 0 h (T₀), 4 h (T₄), 8 h (T₈), 24 h (T₂₄), 48 h (T₄₈), and 72 h (T₇₂) after the procedure. Adverse events and intake of analgesics were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: The concentrations of lidocaine in tumor tissues were higher in experimental group than in control group at T_0.5 (P=0.004), T₁ (P=0.038), T₄ (P=0.036), and T₈ (P=0.029). In the clinical trial, VAS scores in Group B were significantly lower than in Group A at T₀ (P=0.006), T₄ (P=0.001), T₈ (P=0.002), and T₂₄ (P=0.005). The tramadol intake in Group B was significantly lower than in Group A (P=0.021). No significant difference was observed regarding the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of intraarterial lidocaine administration using the W/O technique in controlling intra- and post-TACE pain.

Background: Increasing evidence has highlighted that systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), a recently developed prognostic biomarker that utilizes peripheral platelet, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, is associated with unfavorable prognosis in various tumors. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance of SII in high-grade gliomas patients undergoing radical resection remains unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the potential of SII as a prognostic biomarker in this patient population. Methods: A total of 111 adult patients with high-grade gliomas who underwent radical resection were consecutively enrolled in this investigation. The study involved the categorization of patients into high and low SII groups using predetermined cut-off values. Subsequently, forward stepwise logistic regression was employed to identify autonomous predictors for early gliomas recurrence. To mitigate the impact of confounding factors, a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between high and low SII patients. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier approach was utilized to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two groups. Results: The study involved the categorization of patients into two groups based on their SII levels, namely high SII (> 604.8) and low SII (≤ 604.8) groups. Forward stepwise logistic regression revealed that high SII (p < 0.001) and tumor size ≥ 50 mm (p < 0.001) were significantly related to early recurrence of gliomas. Furthermore, the results indicate that PFS and OS were significantly shorter in the high SII group compared to the low SII group, both before and after PSM (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative biomarker SII can serve as a prognostic biomarker for early recurrence and prognosis in patients with high-grade gliomas undergoing radical resection. Furthermore, the combination of tumor size and SII demonstrates a robust predictive capacity for early recurrence and prognosis in this patient population.