Dirk Albach

Prof. Dirk Albach

Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 January 2013 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
Dirk AlbachDirk Albach
Dirk Albach
SAS. Ansell
S. Ansell
JAJ. W. Arntzen
J. W. Arntzen
SBS. J. E. Baird
S. J. E. Baird
DZD. Zinner
D. Zinner
Hybridization has many and varied impacts on the process of speciation. Hybridization may slow or reverse differentiation by allowing gene flow and recombination. It may accelerate speciation via adaptive introgression or cause near‐instantaneous speciation by allopolyploidization. It may have multiple effects at different stages and in different spatial contexts within a single speciation event. We offer a perspective on the context and evolutionary significance of hybridization during speciation, highlighting issues of current interest and debate. In secondary contact zones, it is uncertain if barriers to gene flow will be strengthened or broken down due to recombination and gene flow. Theory and empirical evidence suggest the latter is more likely, except within and around strongly selected genomic regions. Hybridization may contribute to speciation through the formation of new hybrid taxa, whereas introgression of a few loci may promote adaptive divergence and so facilitate speciation. Gene regulatory networks, epigenetic effects and the evolution of selfish genetic material in the genome suggest that theDobzhansky–Muller model of hybrid incompatibilities requires a broader interpretation. Finally, although the incidence of reinforcement remains uncertain, this and other interactions in areas of sympatry may have knock‐on effects on speciation both within and outside regions of hybridization.

1 January 2000 in Kew Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSV. Savolainen
V. Savolainen
MFM. F. Fay
M. F. Fay
Dirk AlbachDirk Albach
Dirk Albach
ABA. Backlund
A. Backlund
MBM. van der Bank
M. van der Bank
MCM. W. Chase
M. W. Chase

1 February 2005 in American Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dirk AlbachDirk Albach
Dirk Albach
HMH. M. Meudt
H. M. Meudt
BOB. Oxelman
B. Oxelman
Scrophulariaceae is one of the families that has been divided extensively due to the results of DNA sequence studies. One of its segregates is a vastly enlarged Plantaginaceae. In a phylogenetic study of 47 members of Plantaginaceae and seven outgroups based on 3561 aligned characters from four DNA regions (the nuclear ribosomal ITS region and the plastid trnL‐F, rps16 intron, and matK‐trnK intron regions), the relationships within this clade were analyzed. The results from parsimony and Bayesian analyses support the removal of the Lindernieae from Gratioleae to a position outside Plantaginaceae. A group of mainly New World genera is paraphyletic with respect to a clade of Old World genera. Among the New World taxa, those offering oil as a pollinator reward cluster together. Ourisia is sister to this clade. Gratioleae consist of Gratiola, Otacanthus, Bacopa, Stemodia, Scoparia, and Mecardonia. Cheloneae plus Russelia and Tetranema together constitute the sister group to a clade predominantly composed of Old World taxa. Among the Old World clade, Ellisiophyllum and Lafuentea have been analyzed for the first time in a molecular phylogenetic analysis. The former genus is sister to Sibthorpia and the latter is surprisingly the sister to Antirrhineae.

28 August 2018 in Journal of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichael Kleyer
Michael Kleyer
JTJuliane Trinogga
Juliane Trinogga
MCMiguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
ATAnastasia Trenkamp
Anastasia Trenkamp
CFCamilla Fløjgaard
Camilla Fløjgaard
BBBernd Blasius
Bernd Blasius
Correlations among plant traits often reflect important trade‐offs or allometric relationships in biological functions like carbon gain, support, water uptake, and reproduction that are associated with different plant organs. Whether trait correlations can be aggregated to “spectra” or “leading dimensions,” whether these dimensions are consistent across plant organs, spatial scale, and growth forms are still open questions. To illustrate the current state of knowledge, we constructed a network of published trait correlations associated with the “leaf economics spectrum,” “biomass allocation dimension,” “seed dimension,” and carbon and nitrogen concentrations. This literature‐based network was compared to a network based on a dataset of 23 traits from 2,530 individuals of 126 plant species from 381 plots in Northwest Europe. The observed network comprised more significant correlations than the literature‐based network. Network centrality measures showed that size traits such as the mass of leaf, stem, below‐ground, and reproductive tissues and plant height were the most central traits in the network, confirming the importance of allometric relationships in herbaceous plants. Stem mass and stem‐specific length were “hub” traits correlated with most traits. Environmental selection of hub traits may affect the whole phenotype. In contrast to the literature‐based network, SLA and leaf N were of minor importance. Based on cluster analysis and subsequent PCAs of the resulting trait clusters, we found a “size” module, a “seed” module, two modules representing C and N concentrations in plant organs, and a “partitioning” module representing organ mass fractions. A module representing the plant economics spectrum did not emerge. Synthesis. Although we found support for several trait dimensions, the observed trait network deviated significantly from current knowledge, suggesting that previous studies have overlooked trait coordination at the whole‐plant level. Furthermore, network analysis suggests that stem traits have a stronger regulatory role in herbaceous plants than leaf traits.

6 June 2024 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKevin Karbstein
Kevin Karbstein
LKLara Kösters
Lara Kösters
LHLadislav Hodac
Ladislav Hodac
MHMartin Hofmann
Martin Hofmann
EHElvira Hörandl
Elvira Hörandl
JWJana Wäldchen
Jana Wäldchen
Although species are central units for biological research, recent findings in genomics are raising awareness that what we call species can be ill-founded entities due to solely morphology-based, regional species descriptions. This particularly applies to groups characterized by intricate evolutionary processes such as hybridization, polyploidy, or asexuality. Here, challenges of current integrative taxonomy (genetics/genomics + morphology + ecology, etc.) become apparent: different favored species concepts, lack of universal characters/markers, missing appropriate analytical tools for intricate evolutionary processes, and highly subjective ranking and fusion of datasets. Now, integrative taxonomy combined with artificial intelligence under a unified species concept can enable automated feature learning and data integration, and thus reduce subjectivity in species delimitation. This approach will likely accelerate revising and unraveling eukaryotic biodiversity.

1 January 2010 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBastian Schäferhoff
Bastian Schäferhoff
AFAndreas Fleischmann
Andreas Fleischmann
EFEberhard Fischer
Eberhard Fischer
Dirk AlbachDirk Albach
Dirk Albach
TBThomas Borsch
Thomas Borsch
KMKai F Müller
Kai F Müller
In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past.