Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey

Dr. Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2011 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBValentina Boeva
Valentina Boeva
TPTatiana Popova
Tatiana Popova
KBKevin Bleakley
Kevin Bleakley
PCPierre Chiche
Pierre Chiche
JCJulie Cappo
Julie Cappo
EBEmmanuel Barillot
Emmanuel Barillot
Summary: More and more cancer studies use next-generation sequencing (NGS) data to detect various types of genomic variation. However, even when researchers have such data at hand, single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been considered necessary to assess copy number alterations and especially loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Here, we present the tool Control-FREEC that enables automatic calculation of copy number and allelic content profiles from NGS data, and consequently predicts regions of genomic alteration such as gains, losses and LOH. Taking as input aligned reads, Control-FREEC constructs copy number and B-allele frequency profiles. The profiles are then normalized, segmented and analyzed in order to assign genotype status (copy number and allelic content) to each genomic region. When a matched normal sample is provided, Control-FREEC discriminates somatic from germline events. Control-FREEC is able to analyze overdiploid tumor samples and samples contaminated by normal cells. Low mappability regions can be excluded from the analysis using provided mappability tracks. Availability: C++ source code is available at: http://bioinfo.curie.fr/projects/freec/ Contact:freec@curie.fr Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

16 October 2008 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IJIsabelle Janoueix-Lerosey
Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey
DLDelphine Lequin
Delphine Lequin
LBLaurence Brugières
Laurence Brugières
ARAgnès Ribeiro
Agnès Ribeiro
LPLoïc de Pontual
Loïc de Pontual
ODOlivier Delattre
Olivier Delattre

29 June 2015 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TEThomas Eleveld
Thomas Eleveld
DODerek A Oldridge
Derek A Oldridge
VBVirginie Bernard
Virginie Bernard
JKJan Koster
Jan Koster
LDLeo Colmet Daage
Leo Colmet Daage
JMJohn M Maris
John M Maris

24 July 2017 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBValentina Boeva
Valentina Boeva
CLCaroline Louis-Brennetot
Caroline Louis-Brennetot
APAgathe Peltier
Agathe Peltier
SDSimon Durand
Simon Durand
CPCécile Pierre-Eugène
Cécile Pierre-Eugène
IJIsabelle Janoueix-Lerosey
Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey

23 January 1998 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEArnaud Echard
Arnaud Echard
FJFlorence Jollivet
Florence Jollivet
OMOlivier Martinez
Olivier Martinez
JLJean-Jacques LacapèrE
Jean-Jacques LacapèrE
ARAnnie Rousselet
Annie Rousselet
BGBruno Goud
Bruno Goud
Rab guanosine triphosphatases regulate vesicular transport and membrane traffic within eukaryotic cells. Here, a kinesin-like protein that interacts with guanosine triphosphate (GTP)–bound forms of Rab6 was identified. This protein, termed Rabkinesin-6, was localized to the Golgi apparatus and shown to play a role in the dynamics of this organelle. The carboxyl-terminal domain of Rabkinesin-6, which contains the Rab6-interacting domain, inhibited the effects of Rab6-GTP on intracellular transport. Thus, a molecular motor is a potential effector of a Rab protein, and coordinated action between members of these two families of proteins could control membrane dynamics and directional vesicular traffic.

1 March 2009 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IJIsabelle Janoueix-Lerosey
Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey
GSGudrun Schleiermacher
Gudrun Schleiermacher
EMEvi Michels
Evi Michels
VMVéronique Mosseri
Véronique Mosseri
ARAgnès Ribeiro
Agnès Ribeiro
ODOlivier Delattre
Olivier Delattre
Purpose For a comprehensive overview of the genetic alterations of neuroblastoma, their association and clinical significance, we conducted a whole-genome DNA copy number analysis. Patients and Methods A series of 493 neuroblastoma (NB) samples was investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in two consecutive steps (224, then 269 patients). Results Genomic analysis identified several types of profiles. Tumors presenting exclusively whole-chromosome copy number variations were associated with excellent survival. No disease-related death was observed in this group. In contrast, tumors with any type of segmental chromosome alterations characterized patients with a high risk of relapse. Patients with both numerical and segmental abnormalities clearly shared the higher risk of relapse of segmental-only patients. In a multivariate analysis, taking into account the genomic profile, but also previously described individual genetic and clinical markers with prognostic significance, the presence of segmental alterations with (HR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 14.5; P < .001) or without MYCN amplification (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 8.4; P < .001) was the strongest predictor of relapse; the other significant variables were age older than 18 months (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8; P = .004) and stage 4 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.7; P = .005). Finally, within tumors showing segmental alterations, stage 4, age, MYCN amplification, 1p and 11q deletions, and 1q gain were independent predictors of decreased overall survival. Conclusion The analysis of the overall genomic pattern, which probably unravels particular genomic instability mechanisms rather than the analysis of individual markers, is essential to predict relapse in NB patients. It adds critical prognostic information to conventional markers and should be included in future treatment stratification.