Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research.

Prostate cancer is a very common and highly unpredictable form of cancer. Whereas many prostate cancers are slow growing and could be left without treatment, others are very aggressive. Additionally, today there is no curative treatment for prostate cancer patients with local or distant metastasis. Identification of new, improved prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer and the finding of better treatment strategies for metastatic prostate cancer is therefore highly warranted. Interactions between epithelium and stroma are known to be important already during prostate development and this interplay is critical also in development, progression of primary tumors and growth of metastases. It is therefore reasonable to expect that future biomarkers and therapeutic targets can be identified in the prostate tumor and metastasis stroma and this possibility should be further explored.

Importance of the field: Prostate cancer is a common and multifocal disease but the diagnostic methods available are unsatisfactory. Most tumors present are of low malignant potential, whereas others are highly aggressive. At present, imaging cannot be used to guide tissue biopsies safely towards the most aggressive tumor present. To handle this problem multiple needle biopsies are taken. The biopsies often contain only normal prostate tissue, and even if the tumor is sampled it is not known whether a more aggressive cancer is present elsewhere in the organ. If changes in the normal tissue indicate the presence and nature of tumors, this information could be used to improve diagnostics and prognostics of prostate cancer. Areas covered in this review: Current evidence that the tumor-adjacent morphologically normal prostate tissue is not completely normal is reviewed, and that this tissue, named tumor indicating normal tissue (TINT) by the authors, can be used to diagnose prostate cancer. What the reader wi...

Pigment epithelium-derived factor, a potent angiogenesis inhibitor in the eye, is also expressed in the prostate. Prostate size and angiogenesis is increased in pigment epithelium-derived factor knockout mice, and pigment epithelium-derived factor is down-regulated in some prostate cancers. To investigate whether pigment epithelium-derived factor expression correlates with tumor progression, we examined 5 Dunning rat prostate sublines with different growth rates, differentiation, androgen dependence, vascular density, and metastatic ability and 26 human prostate cancers of Gleason score 8–10 obtained from patients at transurethral resection selected to represent two groups, with and without metastases at diagnosis. By Western blot, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunostaining, pigment epithelium-derived factor was detected in highly differentiated, nonmetastatic, androgen-sensitive Dunning tumors and in the anaplastic, androgen insensitive but nonmetastatic Dunning tumors. In contrast, the metastatic Dunning tumor sublines showed very low pigment epithelium-derived factor expression levels. In human cancer tissues, by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, patients without metastases at diagnosis had higher tumor pigment epithelium-derived factor levels than tumors from patients with metastases at diagnosis. In both the rat model and in the human tumors, the proliferation index and vascular count, as determined by Ki-67 staining and endoglin and/or factor VIII-related antigen staining, inversely correlated with pigment epithelium-derived factor mRNA levels. These observations indicate that loss of pigment epithelium-derived factor expression could be associated with the progression toward a metastatic phenotype in prostate cancer.