The present study aims to highlight how women perceive and adapt to infertility difficulties. To better understand the difficulties that women diagnosed with infertility are experiencing, the study explores this concept in correlation with anxiety and coping. 240 women with fertility problems from various parts of Romania completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Form Y), Brief COPE and the scale “Difficulties With Infertility and Its Treatment.” Statistical analyzes showed that women who were at the beginning of treatment obtained higher scores on the anxiety [F(2,237) = 4.76, p = 0.009] and on the difficulties scale [F(2,237) = 3.53, p = 0.031], compared to participants who resorted to repeated fertilization procedures. It is important to emphasize that there is a significant positive correlation between the perception of infertility difficulties and coping, and also between difficulties and state anxiety. Regarding the relationship between state anxiety and coping, there were significant positive associations between maladaptive coping strategies and state anxiety, while adaptive strategies were negatively associated with state anxiety. In addition, regarding coping strategies, venting and self-blame occurred predominantly in women who know that the cause of infertility is female-related. These findings draws attention to the fact that infertile women live this experience at very high levels of anxiety, using quite a few adaptive coping mechanisms. These results highlight the need to investigate ways to reduce anxiety and optimizing adaptive coping strategies.

The doctor–patient relationship is fundamental in the treatment of infertility, due to the emotional implications of fertilization procedures. However, insufficient data are available specifically for this relationship. The general objective of the study is to establish the associations between the fundamental concepts that define the doctor–patient relationship: communication, empathy, trust, collaboration, compliance and satisfaction. A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and June 2020 and followed the methods of a quantitative analysis, collecting the data using questionnaires. The research plan was specific to path analysis with the mediation effect, in which the hypotheses were tested. The research group consisted of 151 women diagnosed with infertility, voluntarily recruited through online support communities. Findings demonstrate that affective empathy mediates the relationship between communication and trust in the doctor. In conclusion, this study draws attention to the importance of basic concepts in the relationship of infertility specialists with infertile patients. Thus, it is necessary for health care providers in assisted human reproduction to participate in programs for the continuous training of empathic communication skills, given the sensitivity of this diagnosis.

Background and Objectives: High-risk pregnancy increases vulnerability to psychological distress, but protective mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study compared emotional distress and coping strategies between women with high- and low-risk pregnancies and investigated whether active coping and marital satisfaction moderated associations between negative pregnancy experiences, prenatal depression and perceived stress. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 195 pregnant women aged 18–51 years (M = 31.76, SD = 5.32), including 102 women with high-risk pregnancies and 93 women with low-risk pregnancies. Participants completed the EPDS, STAI, PSS-10, PRAS, PES, COPE, and CSI. Independent-samples t tests, correlation analyses, and moderation analyses were conducted. Results: Women with high-risk pregnancies reported significantly higher levels of prenatal depression (p = 0.032) and pregnancy-related anxiety (p < 0.001) than women with low-risk pregnancies. They also reported lower socio-emotional support (p = 0.036) and mental disengagement coping (p = 0.022). Negative pregnancy experiences were positively associated with state anxiety, pregnancy-related anxiety, prenatal depression, and perceived stress after controlling for pregnancy risk status (all p < 0.001). Maladaptive coping was generally associated with higher emotional distress, whereas adaptive coping, particularly positive reinterpretation and planning, was associated with lower levels of prenatal depression and anxiety. Active coping moderated the association between negative pregnancy experiences and perceived stress (β = −0.16, p = 0.016). Marital satisfaction moderated the association between prenatal depression and perceived stress among women with high-risk pregnancies (β = −0.21, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Active coping and marital satisfaction were associated with lower psychological distress and may represent potentially modifiable psychological resources for women experiencing high-risk pregnancies. Although the cross-sectional design precludes causal inferences, these findings highlight the potential value of integrating psychological screening, coping-focused interventions, and partner involvement into prenatal care, particularly for women with high-risk pregnancies.

Background and Objectives: High-risk pregnancy is associated with increased vulnerability to psychological distress, yet the protective mechanisms that may buffer this vulnerability remain insufficiently understood. This study examined differences in emotional distress and coping strategies between women with high-risk and low-risk pregnancies and investigated whether active coping and marital satisfaction attenuate associations between negative pregnancy experiences, prenatal depression and perceived stress. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 195 pregnant women aged 18–51 years (M = 31.76, SD = 5.32), including 102 women with high-risk pregnancies and 93 women with low-risk pregnancies. Participants completed measures of prenatal depression (EPDS), state anxiety (STAI), perceived stress (PSS-10), pregnancy-related anxiety (PRAS), pregnancy experiences (PES), coping strategies (COPE), and marital satisfaction (CSI). Independent-samples t tests, correlation analyses, partial correlations and moderation analyses were conducted. Results: Women with high-risk pregnancies reported significantly higher levels of prenatal depression (p = 0.032) and pregnancy-related anxiety (p < 0.001) than women with low-risk pregnancies. They also reported lower use of socio-emotional support (p = 0.036) and mental disengagement coping strategies (p = 0.022). Negative pregnancy experiences were positively associated with state anxiety, pregnancy-related anxiety, prenatal depression, and perceived stress after controlling for pregnancy risk status (all p < 0.001). Maladaptive coping strategies were generally associated with higher emotional distress, whereas adaptive coping strategies, particularly positive reinterpretation and planning, were associated with lower levels of prenatal depression and anxiety. Active coping moderated the association between negative pregnancy experiences and perceived stress (β = −0.16, p = 0.016). Marital satisfaction moderated the association between prenatal depression and perceived stress among women with high-risk pregnancies (β = −0.21, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Active coping and marital satisfaction emerged as modifiable protective factors that may attenuate psychological distress during pregnancy. These findings support the integration of psychological screening, coping-focused interventions, and partner involvement into prenatal care, particularly for women experiencing high-risk pregnancies.