Site-specific crop management demands maps which present the content of the main macronutrients. Such maps are prepared based on optimized soil sampling within management zones, which should be quite homogenous according to nutrient content, especially the content of potassium and phosphorus. Delineation of management zones is very often conducted using soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC) or other variables related to soil condition, including satellite-derived vegetation indices. In this study conducted in North-Western Poland, relationships between soil electrical conductivity and the satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of various crops (wheat, barley, and rapeseed) with soil pH and content of P, K, and Mg were evaluated. Strong relationships were observed between NDVI of cereals with potassium content in soil. Correlation coefficients for wheat ranged from 0.37 to 0.60 for average potassium content for three years and from 0.05 to 0.63 for barley. Stronger relationships were observed for the years 2018 and 2019 when NDVI was based on Sentinel-2 data, while weaker for year 2017 when Landsat 8 NDVI was used. Relationships between EC and macronutrients content were similar to those observed with NDVI. Satellite-derived NDVI of cereals can be used as a variable for the delineation of within-field management zones. The same relationships were much weaker and not consistent for winter rapeseed.
Among European countries, Poland has the largest gap in the grain yield of winter wheat, and thus the greatest potential to reduce this yield gap. This paper aims to recognize the main reasons for winter wheat yield variability and shed the light on possible reasons for this gap. We used long-term datasets (2008–2018) from individual commercial farms obtained by the Laboratory of Economics of Seed and Plant Breeding of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute (IHAR)-National Research Institute (Poland) and the experimental fields with high, close to potential yield, in the Polish Post-Registration Variety Testing System in multi-environmental trials. We took into account environment, management and genetic variables. Environment was considered through soil class representing soil fertility. For the crop management, the rates of mineral fertilization, the use of pesticides and the type of pre-crop were considered. Genotype was represented by the independent variable year of cultivar registration or year of starting its cultivation in Poland. The analysis was performed using the CART (Classification and Regression Trees). The winter wheat yield variability was mostly dependent on the amount of nitrogen fertilization applied, soil quality, and type of pre-crop. Genetic variable was also important, which means that plant breeding has successfully increased genetic yield potential especially during the last several years. In general, changes to management practices are needed to lower the variability of winter wheat yield and possibly to close the yield gap in Poland.
23 August 2014 in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a hot topic for debate among researchers from a wide range of scientific disciplines – in particular, agriculture, biotechnology and environmental protection. The debate, however, is not limited to science. GMOs are also discussed in the mass media, giving rise to extreme emotions, both positive and negative. Without entering the argument between the supporters and opponents of GMOs, this paper addresses the following questions. How do future experts in agriculture, biotechnology and environmental protection approach the topic of GMOs? Do they have similar or dramatically different views on this subject? What do they know about GMOs? Is their knowledge related to their attitudes? University students specializing in those three disciplines can be considered as future experts in the field, and so a questionnaire survey was conducted among them to answer the above questions. The results show that agricultural, biotechnology and environmental protection students differ in their attitudes to and knowledge about GMOs.