Tony John Vyn

Prof. Dr. Tony John Vyn

Purdue University West Lafayette, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications


11 May 2022 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDaniel Liptzin
Daniel Liptzin
CNCharlotte E. Norris
Charlotte E. Norris
SCShannon B. Cappellazzi
Shannon B. Cappellazzi
GBG. Mac Bean
G. Mac Bean
MCMichael Cope
Michael Cope
CHC. Wayne Honeycutt
C. Wayne Honeycutt

1 September 2013 in Global Food Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJ.S. Boyer
J.S. Boyer
PBP. Byrne
P. Byrne
KCK.G. Cassman
K.G. Cassman
MCM. Cooper
M. Cooper
DDD. Delmer
D. Delmer
JGJ. Gaffney
J. Gaffney

1 November 2009 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBChristopher R. Boomsma
Christopher R. Boomsma
JSJudith B. Santini
Judith B. Santini
MTMatthijs Tollenaar
Matthijs Tollenaar
TVTony John Vyn
Tony John Vyn
Mounting concerns over the cost and environmental impact of N fertilizer combined with progressively higher plant densities in maize (Zea mays L.) production systems make progress in maize N use efficiency (NUE) and N stress tolerance essential. The primary objectives of this 3‐yr field study were to (i) evaluate the N responsiveness, NUE, and N stress tolerance of multiple modern maize genotypes using suboptimal, optimal, and supraoptimal plant densities (54,000, 79,000, and 104,000 plants ha−1, respectively) with three levels of side‐dress N (0, 165, and 330 kg N ha−1), (ii) identify key morphophysiological responses to the simultaneous stresses of intense crowding and low N availability, and (iii) consider our results with extensive reference to literature on maize morphophysiological responses to plant crowding and N availability. At optimal and supraoptimal plant densities, maize receiving 165 kg ha−1 of side‐dress N displayed strong N responsiveness, high NUE, pronounced crowding tolerance, and plant density independence. However, crowding tolerance was contingent on N application. Relative to less crowded, N‐fertilized environments, the 104,000 plants ha−1, 0 kg N ha−1 treatment combination exhibited (i) reduced pre‐ and postanthesis plant height (PHT), stem diameter (SD), and total biomass; (ii) greater preflowering leaf senescence and lower R1 leaf areas at individual‐leaf, per‐plant, and canopy levels; (iii) enhanced floral protandry; (iv) lower pre‐ and postanthesis leaf‐chlorophyll content; (v) lower per‐plant kernel number (KNP), individual kernel weight (KW), grain yield per plant (GYP), andharvest index per plant (HIP); and (vi) enhanced per‐plant grain yield variability (GYCV). Genetic efforts to improve high plant density tolerance should, therefore, simultaneously focus on enhancing NUE and N stress tolerance.

1 October 2007 in Soil and Tillage Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAnita Gál
Anita Gál
TVTony John Vyn
Tony John Vyn
EMErika Michéli
Erika Michéli
EKEileen J. Kladivko
Eileen J. Kladivko
WMWilliam W. McFee
William W. McFee