James Amos-Landgraf

Dr. James Amos-Landgraf

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 May 2009 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDeanna M. Church
Deanna M. Church
LGLeo Goodstadt
Leo Goodstadt
LHLaDeana W. Hillier
LaDeana W. Hillier
MZMichael C. Zody
Michael C. Zody
SGSteve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
TCThe Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium
The Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium
The mouse (Mus musculus) is the premier animal model for understanding human disease and development. Here we show that a comprehensive understanding of mouse biology is only possible with the availability of a finished, high-quality genome assembly. The finished clone-based assembly of the mouse strain C57BL/6J reported here has over 175,000 fewer gaps and over 139 Mb more of novel sequence, compared with the earlier MGSCv3 draft genome assembly. In a comprehensive analysis of this revised genome sequence, we are now able to define 20,210 protein-coding genes, over a thousand more than predicted in the human genome (19,042 genes). In addition, we identified 439 long, non–protein-coding RNAs with evidence for transcribed orthologs in human. We analyzed the complex and repetitive landscape of 267 Mb of sequence that was missing or misassembled in the previously published assembly, and we provide insights into the reasons for its resistance to sequencing and assembly by whole-genome shotgun approaches. Duplicated regions within newly assembled sequence tend to be of more recent ancestry than duplicates in the published draft, correcting our initial understanding of recent evolution on the mouse lineage. These duplicates appear to be largely composed of sequence regions containing transposable elements and duplicated protein-coding genes; of these, some may be fixed in the mouse population, but at least 40% of segmentally duplicated sequences are copy number variable even among laboratory mouse strains. Mouse lineage-specific regions contain 3,767 genes drawn mainly from rapidly-changing gene families associated with reproductive functions. The finished mouse genome assembly, therefore, greatly improves our understanding of rodent-specific biology and allows the delineation of ancestral biological functions that are shared with human from derived functions that are not. The availability of an accurate genome sequence provides the bedrock upon which modern biomedical research is based. Here we describe a high-quality assembly, Build 36, of the mouse genome. This assembly was put together by aligning overlapping individual clones representing parts of the genome, and it provides a more complete picture than previous assemblies, because it adds much rodent-specific sequence that was previously unavailable. The addition of these sequences provides insight into both the genomic architecture and the gene complement of the mouse. In particular, it highlights recent gene duplications and the expansion of certain gene families during rodent evolution. An improved understanding of the mouse genome and thus mouse biology will enhance the utility of the mouse as a model for human disease.

1 September 2006 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Amos-Landgraf
James Amos-Landgraf
ACAmy Cottle
Amy Cottle
RPRobert M. Plenge
Robert M. Plenge
MFMike Friez
Mike Friez
CSCharles E. Schwartz
Charles E. Schwartz
HWHuntington F. Willard
Huntington F. Willard

1 August 1999 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Amos-Landgraf
James Amos-Landgraf
YJYonggang Ji
Yonggang Ji
WGWayne Gottlieb
Wayne Gottlieb
TDTheresa Depinet
Theresa Depinet
AWAmy E. Wandstrat
Amy E. Wandstrat
RNRobert D. Nicholls
Robert D. Nicholls

6 March 2007 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Amos-Landgraf
James Amos-Landgraf
LKLawrence N. Kwong
Lawrence N. Kwong
CKChristina M. Kendziorski
Christina M. Kendziorski
MRMark Reichelderfer
Mark Reichelderfer
JTJose Torrealba
Jose Torrealba
WDWilliam F. Dove
William F. Dove
Progress toward the understanding and management of human colon cancer can be significantly advanced if appropriate experimental platforms become available. We have investigated whether a rat model carrying a knockout allele in the gatekeeper gene Adenomatous polyposis coli ( Apc ) recapitulates familial colon cancer of the human more closely than existing murine models. We have established a mutagen-induced nonsense allele of the rat Apc gene on an inbred F344/NTac (F344) genetic background. Carriers of this mutant allele develop multiple neoplasms with a distribution between the colon and small intestine that closely simulates that found in human familial adenomatous polyposis patients. To distinguish this phenotype from the predominantly small intestinal phenotype found in most Apc -mutant mouse strains, this strain has been designated the polyposis in the rat colon (Pirc) kindred. The Pirc rat kindred provides several unique and favorable features for the study of colon cancer. Tumor-bearing Pirc rats can live at least 17 months, carrying a significant colonic tumor burden. These tumors can be imaged both by micro computed tomography scanning and by classical endoscopy, enabling longitudinal studies of tumor genotype and phenotype as a function of response to chemopreventive and therapeutic regimes. The metacentric character of the rat karyotype, like that of the human and unlike the acrocentric mouse, has enabled us to demonstrate that the loss of the wild-type Apc allele in tumors does not involve chromosome loss. We believe that the Pirc rat kindred can address many of the current gaps in the modeling of human colon cancer.

3 November 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJames Amos-Landgraf
James Amos-Landgraf
JHJarom Heijmans
Jarom Heijmans
MWMattheus C. B. Wielenga
Mattheus C. B. Wielenga
EDElisa Dunkin
Elisa Dunkin
KKKathy J. Krentz
Kathy J. Krentz
GBGijs R. van Den Brink
Gijs R. van Den Brink
It recently has been recognized that men develop colonic adenomas and carcinomas at an earlier age and at a higher rate than women. In the ApcPirc/+ (Pirc) rat model of early colonic cancer, this sex susceptibility was recapitulated, with male Pirc rats developing twice as many adenomas as females. Analysis of large datasets revealed that the ApcMin/+ mouse also shows enhanced male susceptibility to adenomagenesis, but only in the colon. In addition, WT mice treated with injections of the carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM) showed increased numbers of colonic adenomas in males. The mechanism underlying these observations was investigated by manipulation of hormonal status. The preponderance of colonic adenomas in the Pirc rat model allowed a statistically significant investigation in vivo of the mechanism of sex hormone action on the development of colonic adenomas. Females depleted of endogenous hormones by ovariectomy did not exhibit a change in prevalence of adenomas, nor was any effect observed with replacement of one or a combination of female hormones. In contrast, depletion of male hormones by orchidectomy (castration) markedly protected the Pirc rat from adenoma development, whereas supplementation with testosterone reversed that effect. These observations were recapitulated in the AOM mouse model. Androgen receptor was undetectable in the colon or adenomas, making it likely that testosterone acts indirectly on the tumor lineage. Our findings suggest that indirect tumor-promoting effects of testosterone likely explain the disparity between the sexes in the development of colonic adenomas. Significance The age-adjusted incidence of colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer is higher in men than in women. In a careful analysis of two established animal models, we found that castration reduced, and testosterone supplementation restored, the number of adenomas in the male rat and mouse colon, whereas ovariectomy and replacement of female hormones had no measureable effect on colonic adenomagenesis. In Min mice, in which most of the tumors arise in the small intestine, this testosterone-dependent sexual dimorphism in mice was specific to the colon. Our results support a paradigm shift: Testosterone promotes early adenomagenesis through an indirect mechanism, explaining the enhanced susceptibility of males to colonic adenomagenesis in the human, rat, and mouse.

1 January 2014 in Disease Models & Mechanisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAmy A. Irving
Amy A. Irving
KYKazuto Yoshimi
Kazuto Yoshimi
MHMarcia L. Hart
Marcia L. Hart
Taybor ParkerTaybor Parker
Taybor Parker
LCLinda Clipson
Linda Clipson
JAJames Amos-Landgraf
James Amos-Landgraf
Prior to the advent of genetic engineering in the mouse, the rat was the model of choice for investigating the etiology of cancer. Now, recent advances in the manipulation of the rat genome, combined with a growing recognition of the physiological differences between mice and rats, have reignited interest in the rat as a model of human cancer. Two recently developed rat models, the polyposis in the rat colon (Pirc) and Kyoto Apc Delta (KAD) strains, each carry mutations in the intestinal-cancer-associated adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene. In contrast to mouse models carrying Apc mutations, in which cancers develop mainly in the small intestine rather than in the colon and there is no gender bias, these rat models exhibit colonic predisposition and gender-specific susceptibility, as seen in human colon cancer. The rat also provides other experimental resources as a model organism that are not provided by the mouse: the structure of its chromosomes facilitates the analysis of genomic events, the size of its colon permits longitudinal analysis of tumor growth, and the size of biological samples from the animal facilitates multiplexed molecular analyses of the tumor and its host. Thus, the underlying biology and experimental resources of these rat models provide important avenues for investigation. We anticipate that advances in disease modeling in the rat will synergize with resources that are being developed in the mouse to provide a deeper understanding of human colon cancer.