Objective Advances in minimally invasive surgery, particularly with robotic surgery, have resulted in improved peri-operative outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. In addition, randomized trials have shown that addition of adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery improves loco-regional disease control among stage I intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment of robotic surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient population. Methods A single-center retrospective study was conducted on stage I endometrioid-type endometrial cancer patients with intermediate-risk features (50% myometrial involvement and grade 1–2 histopathology) treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2015. Data on surgery and radiotherapy were collected and correlated with clinical and surgical outcomes using log-rank. Oncologic outcomes were then compared between robotic surgery and laparotomy. Results A total of 179 intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients were identified, of whom 135 (75.4%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and were included in the final analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 40–89) and median follow-up was 4.7 years (range 1.1–8.8). Seventy-seven patients (57%) underwent robotic surgery and 58 patients (43%) underwent laparotomy. Surgical staging with lymph node dissection was performed on 79.3% of the patients. The majority of patients (79.3%) received vaginal brachytherapy as part of adjuvant radiotherapy, while 20.7% received external-beam radiotherapy. Among the entire cohort, eight (5.9%) patients recurred and all eight recurrences occurred in the robotic surgery group; no recurrence was found in the laparotomy group. This translated into 5 year disease-free survival of 100% in the laparotomy group, compared with 91.8% in the robotic surgery group (p=0.005). No difference in overall survival was found between the two groups (p=0.51). Conclusion Oncologic outcomes for stage I intermediate-risk endometrial cancer treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy at our institution are comparable to the previously published literature. The higher recurrence rate observed with robotic surgery at our institution has not been observed previously and requires further investigation.

Radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy is used to treat locally advanced cervical cancer. Our institution has transitioned to high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) from low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in 2008, and a review was conducted on the effect of this change on patient outcomes. A single-arm retrospective chart review was performed on locally advanced (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique stage IB-IVA) patients with cervical cancer treated with combined external beam radiation therapy and HDR-ICBT with curative intent between 2008 and 2014. Clinical outcomes were evaluated, and multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. Of the 76 patients selected, median age was 47.9 years and median follow-up was 5.2 years. Thirteen patients (17.1%) developed locoregional recurrence and 23 patients (30.3%) patients developed distant recurrence. Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 63.7% and 69.3%, respectively. A significant survival difference was found between stages (P < .001). Multivariate analysis found nodal involvement was strongly associated with poorer survival (P = .007). Our experience with the transition to HDR-ICBT as part of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer resulted in acceptable long-term outcomes and toxicity to that of LDR brachytherapy. Potential further improvement of treatment outcomes for patients may be possible with image guided brachytherapy and the addition of effective systemic therapy.

Introduction: Variable costs of different radiation treatment modalities have played an important factor in selecting the most appropriate treatment for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Analysis using a Markov model was conducted to simulate 20-year disease trajectory, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health system costs of a cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with mean age of 60 years. Clinical outcomes on toxicity and disease recurrence were measured and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed, varying input parameters simultaneously according to their distributions. Results: Among the six radiation treatment modalities, including conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hypofractionated IMRT, IMRT combined with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, HDR brachytherapy monotherapy, low-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), SBRT was found to be more cost-effective when compared with LDR-b and other treatment modalities, resulting in an incremental cost–utility ratio of $2985 per QALY. Conclusions: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the most cost-effective radiation treatment modality in treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer, while treatment toxicity and cost data are the key drivers of the cost–utility. Further work is required with long-term follow-up for SBRT.