Aldo Pietro Maggioni

Prof. Aldo Pietro Maggioni

ANMCO Research Center, Heart Care Foundation, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2012 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTask Force Members
Task Force Members
JMJohn J V Mcmurray
John J V Mcmurray
SAStamatis Adamopoulos
Stamatis Adamopoulos
SAStefan D Anker
Stefan D Anker
AAAngelo Auricchio
Angelo Auricchio
DRDocument Reviewers
Document Reviewers
The originally published version of this paper was incorrect. In the table on page 1816, the Class of recommendation and Level of evidence for ‘The patient is pacemaker dependent as a result of AV nodal ablation’ should have read ‘IIa’ and ‘B’ respectively.

30 August 2013 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGilles Montalescot
Gilles Montalescot
USUdo Sechtem
Udo Sechtem
SAStephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach
FAFelicita Andreotti
Felicita Andreotti
CAChris Arden
Chris Arden
AYAylin Yildirir
Aylin Yildirir

26 December 2019 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif
SKSimon Kouz
Simon Kouz
DWDavid D. Waters
David D. Waters
OBOlivier F. Bertrand
Olivier F. Bertrand
RDRafael Diaz
Rafael Diaz
FRFrançois Roubille
François Roubille
Experimental and clinical evidence support the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and its complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, potent antiinflammatory medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout and pericarditis.

24 October 2019 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSScott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon
JMJohn J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray
IAInder S. Anand
Inder S. Anand
JGJunbo Ge
Junbo Ge
CLCarolyn S.P. Lam
Carolyn S.P. Lam
MLMartin P. Lefkowitz
Martin P. Lefkowitz
The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril–valsartan led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effect of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibition in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is unclear.

30 March 2020 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDavid J. Maron
David J. Maron
JHJudith S. Hochman
Judith S. Hochman
HRHarmony R. Reynolds
Harmony R. Reynolds
SBSripal Bangalore
Sripal Bangalore
SOSean M. O’brien
Sean M. O’brien
YRYves Rosenberg
Yves Rosenberg
Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain.

5 October 2017 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JEJohn W. Eikelboom
John W. Eikelboom
SCStuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly
JBJackie Bosch
Jackie Bosch
GDGilles R. Dagenais
Gilles R. Dagenais
RHRobert G. Hart
Robert G. Hart
SYSalim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf
We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424.)