Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has spread widely throughout the world since the end of 2019. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) has played an important role in patient diagnosis and management of COVID-19. In some circumstances, thermal inactivation at 56°C has been recommended to inactivate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) before NAT. However, this procedure could theoretically disrupt nucleic acid integrity of this single-stranded RNA virus and cause false negatives in real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Methods: We investigated whether thermal inactivation could affect the results of viral NAT. We examined the effects of thermal inactivation on the quantitative RT-PCR results of SARS-CoV-2, particularly with regard to the rates of false-negative results for specimens carrying low viral loads. We additionally investigated the effects of different specimen types, sample preservation times, and a chemical inactivation approach on NAT. Results: Our study showed increased Ct values in specimens from diagnosed COVID-19 patients in RT-PCR tests after thermal incubation. Moreover, about half of the weak-positive samples (7 of 15 samples, 46.7%) were RT-PCR negative after heat inactivation in at least one parallel testing. The use of guanidinium-based lysis for preservation of these specimens had a smaller impact on RT-PCR results with fewer false negatives (2 of 15 samples, 13.3%) and significantly less increase in Ct values than heat inactivation. Conclusion: Thermal inactivation adversely affected the efficiency of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Given the limited applicability associated with chemical inactivators, other approaches to ensure the overall protection of laboratory personnel need consideration.
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are complex, web-like structures consisting of DNA intertwined with antimicrobial proteins, which neutrophils release upon immune activation. These structures play a crucial role in pathogen elimination, particularly in infectious diseases. However, their involvement in various pathological conditions is multifaceted and context-dependent, while NETs contribute to host defense against infections, they can also exacerbate sterile inflammation, autoimmune disorders, and tumor progression. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms governing NET formation and examines their interactions with immune cells, emphasizing how these interactions shape immune responses and drive disease dynamics. Furthermore, it explores ongoing clinical trials and emerging therapeutic strategies targeting NETs, offering critical insights into their potential translational applications in clinical practice.
Venetoclax (VEN) was the only Bcl-2 inhibitor approved yet and showed large differences in clinical efficacy. The aim of the study was to explore the relationships between the plasma concentration and efficacy of VEN, and identify potential influencing factors. A retrospective cohort study was conducted and a total of 76 trough (C0h) and 91 6 h post-dose plasma concentration (C6h) blood concentrations of VEN were collected in 54 patients. C6h/D concentration of VEN was found to be significantly correlated with treatment efficacy (p = 0.006) in leukemia patients with good or intermediate prognosis stratification. A ROC curve was then established and the cut-off value was calculated as 0.2868 μg/ml (AUC = 0.7097, p = 0.1081). Besides, patients co-administered with triazoles or carrying CYP3A5 rs776746 AA/AG genotypes were prone to induce higher VEN plasma concentration regardless of whether VEN dosage was reduced or not. Through LASSO-logistic regression and nomogram analysis, chemotherapy regimens and neutrophil percentages were identified as the critical elements that may predict drug response. Above all, in addition to identify prognostic stratification, AML patients taken with VEN were suggested to test plasma concentration routinely so as to achieve desired efficacy, especially when co-administered with triazoles or carried with CYP3A5 rs776746 AA/AG.
22 September 2025 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine