In agricultural ecosystems, pest insects, pathogens and reduced soil fertility pose major challenges to crop productivity and are responsible for significant yield losses worldwide. Management of belowground pests and diseases remains particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the soil and the limited reach of conventional agrochemicals. Boosting the presence of beneficial rhizosphere organisms is a potentially sustainable alternative and may help to optimize crop health and productivity. Field application of single beneficial soil organisms has shown satisfactory results under optimal conditions. This might be further enhanced by combining multiple beneficial soil organisms, but this remains poorly investigated. Here, we inoculated wheat plots with combinations of three beneficial soil organisms that have different rhizosphere functions and studied their effects on crop performance. Plant beneficial Pseudomonas bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN), were inoculated individually or in combinations at seeding, and their effects on plant performance were evaluated throughout the season. We used traditional and molecular identification tools to monitor their persistence over the cropping season in augmented and control treatments, and to estimate the possible displacement of native populations. In three separate trials, beneficial soil organisms were successfully introduced into the native populations and readily survived the field conditions. Various Pseudomonas, mycorrhiza and nematode treatments improved plant health and productivity, while their combinations provided no significant additive or synergistic benefits compared to when applied alone. EPN application temporarily displaced some of the native EPN, but had not significant long-term effect on the associated food web. The strongest positive effect on wheat survival was observed for Pseudomonas and AMF during a season with heavy natural infestation by the frit fly, Oscinella frit, major pest of cereals. Hence, beneficial impacts differed between the beneficial soil organisms and were most evident for plants under biotic stress. Overall, our findings indicate that in wheat production under the test conditions the three beneficial soil organisms can establish nicely and are compatible, but their combined application provides no additional benefits. Further studies are required, also in other cropping systems, to fine-tune the functional interactions among beneficial soil organisms, crops, and the environment.
1 September 2017 in Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) and their bacterial partners are well-studied insect pathogens, and their persistence in soils is one of the key parameters for successful use as biological control agents in agroecosystems. Free-living bacteriophagous nematodes (FLBNs) in the genus Oscheius, often found in soils, can interfere in EPN reproduction when exposed to live insect larvae. Both groups of nematodes can act as facultative scavengers as a survival strategy. Our hypothesis was that EPNs will reproduce in insect cadavers under FLBN presence, but their reproductive capacity will be severely limited when competing with other scavengers for the same niche. We explored the outcome of EPN - Oscheius interaction by using freeze-killed larvae of Galleria mellonella. The differential reproduction ability of two EPN species (Steinernema kraussei and Heterorhabditis megidis), single applied or combined with two FLBNs (Oscheius onirici or Oscheius tipulae), was evaluated under two different infective juvenile (IJ) pressure: low (3IJs/host) and high (20IJs/host). EPNs were able to reproduce in insect cadavers even in the presence of potential scavenger competitors, although EPN progeny was lower than that recorded in live larvae. Hence, when a highly susceptible host is available, exploiting cadavers by EPN might limit the adaptive advantage conferred by the bacteria partner, and might result in an important trade-off on long-term persistence. Contrary to our hypothesis, for most of the combinations, there were not evidences of competitive relationship between both groups of nematodes in freeze-killed larvae, probably because their interactions are subject to interference by the microbial growth inside the dead host. Indeed, evidences of possible beneficial effect of FLBN presence were observed in certain EPN-FLBN treatments compared with single EPN exposure, highlighting the species-specific and context dependency of these multitrophic interactions occurring in the soil.
1 August 2016 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment