Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a frequent and potentially serious complication associated with the widespread use of intravascular devices such as central venous catheters, including peripherally inserted central catheters and implantable port systems, pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although CRT management has been informed by guidelines extrapolated from lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), unique challenges remain due to the distinct anatomical, pathophysiological, and clinical characteristics of upper extremity DVT. Risk factors for CRT are multifactorial, encompassing patient-related characteristics such as cancer, prior venous thromboembolism, and infection, as well as catheter-specific factors like device type, lumens, and insertion site. The diagnosis of CRT relies primarily on ultrasonography; however, computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance imaging play a complementary role, particularly in anatomically challenging cases or when complications such as pulmonary embolism or superior vena cava syndrome are suspected. Treatment strategies for CRT include anticoagulation, catheter removal when feasible, and, in select cases, local thrombolysis or catheter-directed interventions. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of therapy, with direct oral anticoagulants increasingly favored due to their safety profile and efficacy. This article provides a detailed review of CRT, focusing on clinical features, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies while addressing specific challenges in managing pacemaker and hemodialysis catheter-related thrombosis.

Background: The optimal anticoagulation strategy for obese patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) remains unclear. This study evaluates the impact of obesity on anticoagulation patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with lower limb SVT. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study including consecutive patients with SVT in a tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2024. Patients with SVT ≥ 5 cm in length and ≥3 cm from the saphenofemoral junction were included. Obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30) patients were compared. Patients were followed for one year. Outcomes were assessed at 90 and 365 days. The primary outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (SVT, deep vein thrombosis [DVT], or pulmonary embolism [PE]). The secondary outcomes were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Results: Of 136 patients, 58 (42.6%) were obese. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for younger age and higher smoking prevalence in obese patients. Most patients received anticoagulation (91.9%), primarily a prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparin or a prophylactic dose of fondaparinux. No significant differences were found in VTE recurrence at 90 or 365 days (p = 0.505), and no major bleeding events occurred. Female sex was associated with a higher risk of VTE recurrence (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.17–15.98, p = 0.028), but obesity did not influence outcomes. Conclusions: Obesity was not associated with increased VTE recurrence in patients with lower limb SVT. No major bleeding events were observed. These findings suggest that standard anticoagulation regimens may be appropriate for obese patients with SVT, but further studies are needed to confirm these results.