Apostolos Pappas

Dr. Apostolos Pappas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSophia Magkouta
Sophia Magkouta
PVPhotene Christou Vaitsi
Photene Christou Vaitsi
APApostolos Pappas
Apostolos Pappas
MIMarianthi Iliopoulou
Marianthi Iliopoulou
CKChrysavgi Nikolaou Kosti
Chrysavgi Nikolaou Kosti
Ioannis KalomenidisIoannis Kalomenidis
Ioannis Kalomenidis
Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 (CSF1)/Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor 1 (CSF1R) signaling orchestrates tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) recruitment and polarization towards a pro-tumor M2 phenotype, the dominant phenotype of TAMs infiltrating mesothelioma tumors. We hypothesized that CSF1/CSF1R inhibition would halt mesothelioma growth by targeting immunosuppressive M2 macrophages and unleashing efficient T cell responses. We also hypothesized that CSF1/CSF1R blockade would enhance the efficacy of a PDL1 inhibitor which directly activates CD8+ cells. We tested a clinically relevant CSF1R inhibitor (BLZ945) in mesothelioma treatment using syngeneic murine models. We evaluated the role of CSF1/CSF1R axis blockade in tumor-infiltrating immune subsets. We examined the effect of combined anti-CSF1R and anti-PDL1 treatment in mesothelioma progression. CSF1R inhibition impedes mesothelioma progression, abrogates infiltration of TAMs, facilitates an M1 anti-tumor phenotype and activates tumor dendritic and CD8+ T cells. CSF1R inhibition triggers a compensatory PD-1/PDL1 upregulation in tumor and immune cells. Combined CSF1R inhibitor with an anti-PDL1 agent was more effective in retarding mesothelioma growth compared to each monotherapy. In experimental mesotheliomas, CSF1R inhibition abrogates tumor progression by limiting suppressive myeloid populations and enhancing CD8+ cell activation and acts synergistically with anti-PDL1.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSofia Pappa
Sofia Pappa
ZBZafeiria Barmparessou
Zafeiria Barmparessou
NANikolaos Athanasiou
Nikolaos Athanasiou
ESElpitha Sakka
Elpitha Sakka
KEKonstantinos Konstantinos Eleftheriou
Konstantinos Konstantinos Eleftheriou
paraskevi katsaounouparaskevi katsaounou
paraskevi katsaounou
Evidence to date suggests that a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients experience adverse psychological outcomes and neuropsychiatric complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent hospitalization on the mental health, sleep, and quality of life of COVID-19 survivors. Patients were assessed 1–2 months after hospital discharge using standardized screening tools for depression and anxiety (HADS), post-traumatic stress disorder (IES-R), insomnia (AIS), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, disease severity and type of hospitalization were also collected. Amongst the 143 patients included, mental health symptoms were common (depression—19%; anxiety—27%; traumatic stress—39%; insomnia—33%) and more frequently reported in female than in male patients. Age, smoking status, comorbidities and illness severity were not found to significantly correlate with the presence of mood, sleep, or stress disorders. Finally, quality of life was worse for patients requiring ICU (p = 0.0057) or a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) but was unaffected by factors such as sex and other measured outcomes. These findings highlight the need for appropriate intervention to properly manage the immediate and enduring mental health complications of COVID-19.

2 November 2018 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APApostolos Pappas
Apostolos Pappas
SMSophia Magkouta
Sophia Magkouta
IPIoannis S. Pateras
Ioannis S. Pateras
ISIoannis Skianis
Ioannis Skianis
CMCharalampos Moschos
Charalampos Moschos
IKIoannis Kalomenidis
Ioannis Kalomenidis
Versican promotes experimental tumor growth through cell- and non cell-autonomous mechanisms. Its role in mesothelioma progression has not been investigated so far. In this study we investigated the impact of tumor-derived versican in mesothelioma progression and the underlying mechanism of its action. For this purpose, versican-silenced or control ΑΕ17 and ΑΒ1 murine mesothelioma cells were intrapleuraly injected into syngeneic mice, in order to create pleural mesotheliomas and pleural effusions. Intratumoral and pleural immune subsets were assessed using flow cytometry. Mesothelioma cells were co-cultured with syngeneic macrophages to examine versican’s impact on their interaction and endothelial cells to assess the effect of versican in endothelial permeability. Versican expression was assessed in human mesotheliomas and mesothelioma-related pleural effusions and benign pleural tissue and effusions. We observed that, versican silencing reduced mesothelioma mass and pleural fluid volume by affecting tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis in vivo, while tumor cell growth remained intact in vitro, and limited pleural vascular permeability. Mice harboring versican-deficient tumors presented fewer tumor/pleural macrophages and neutrophils, and fewer pleural T-regulatory cells, compared to the control animals. Macrophages co-cultured with versican-deficient mesothelioma cells were polarized towards M1 anti-tumor phenotype and demonstrated increased tumor cell phagocytic capacity, compared to macrophages co-cultured with control tumor cells. In co-culture, endothelial monolayer permeability was less effectively stimulated by versican-deficient cells than control cells. Versican was over-expressed in human mesothelioma tissue and mesothelioma-associated effusion. In conclusion, tumor cell-derived versican stimulates mesothelioma progression by shaping a tumor friendly inflammatory milieu, mainly by blunting macrophage anti-tumor activities.

22 March 2022 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChrysavgi N. Kosti
Chrysavgi N. Kosti
PVPhotene C. Vaitsi
Photene C. Vaitsi
APApostolos Pappas
Apostolos Pappas
MIMarianthi P. Iliopoulou
Marianthi P. Iliopoulou
KPKatherina K. Psarra
Katherina K. Psarra
Ioannis KalomenidisIoannis Kalomenidis
Ioannis Kalomenidis
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an incurable common manifestation of many malignancies. Its formation is orchestrated by complex interactions among tumor cells, inflammatory cells, and the vasculature. Tumor-associated macrophages present the dominant inflammatory population of MPE, and M2 macrophage numbers account for dismal prognosis. M2 polarization is known to be triggered by CSF1/CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling. We hypothesized that CSF1R + M2 macrophages favor MPE formation and could be therapeutically targeted to limit MPE. We generated mice with CSF1R-deficient macrophages and induced lung and colon adenocarcinoma–associated MPE. We also examined the therapeutic potential of a clinically relevant CSF1R inhibitor (BLZ945) in lung and colon adenocarcinoma–induced experimental MPE. We showed that CSF1R + macrophages promoted pleural fluid accumulation by enhancing vascular permeability, destabilizing tumor vessels, and favoring immune suppression. We also showed that CSF1R inhibition limited MPE in vivo by reducing vascular permeability and neoangiogenesis and impeding tumor progression. This was because apart from macrophages, CSF1R signals in cancer-associated fibroblasts leading to macrophage inflammatory protein 2 secretion triggered the manifestation of suppressive and angiogenic properties in macrophages upon CXCR2 paracrine activation. Pharmacological targeting of the CSF1/CSF1R axis can therefore be a vital strategy for limiting MPE.

18 June 2020 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSophia Magkouta
Sophia Magkouta
APApostolos Pappas
Apostolos Pappas
PVPhotene C. Vaitsi
Photene C. Vaitsi
PAPanagiotis C. Agioutantis
Panagiotis C. Agioutantis
Ioannis PaterasIoannis Pateras
Ioannis Pateras
IKIoannis T. Kalomenidis
Ioannis T. Kalomenidis
Oxidative stress and inadequate redox homeostasis is crucial for tumor initiation and progression. MTH1 (NUDT1) enzyme prevents incorporation of oxidized dNTPs by sanitizing the deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pool and is therefore vital for the survival of tumor cells. MTH1 inhibition has been found to inhibit the growth of several experimental tumors, but its role in mesothelioma progression remained elusive. Moreover, although MTH1 is nonessential to normal cells, its role in survival of host cells in tumor milieu, especially tumor endothelium, is unclear. We validated a clinically relevant MTH1 inhibitor (Karonudib) in mesothelioma treatment using human xenografts and syngeneic murine models. We show that MTH1 inhibition impedes mesothelioma progression and that inherent tumoral MTH1 levels are associated with a tumor’s response. We also identified tumor endothelial cells as selective targets of Karonudib and propose a model of intercellular signaling among tumor cells and bystander tumor endothelium. We finally determined the major biological processes associated with elevated MTH1 gene expression in human mesotheliomas.

24 December 2022 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APApostolos Pappas
Apostolos Pappas
ACAnn-Louiza Chaliasou
Ann-Louiza Chaliasou
APAndreas Panagopoulos
Andreas Panagopoulos
KDKonstantina Dede
Konstantina Dede
SDSTAVROULA DASKALOPOULOU
STAVROULA DASKALOPOULOU
Ioannis KalomenidisIoannis Kalomenidis
Ioannis Kalomenidis
Rationale: Changes in anti-SARS-CoV-2 defense immune subsets in patients treated with dexamethasone (DXM) for severe COVID-19 and their relation to disease outcomes are poorly understood. Methods: Blood-lymphocyte subsets of 110 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were prospectively examined. A first sample was taken at enrollment and a second one 7–10 days later. Total B-, T-lymphocytes, CD4+, CD8+, T-regulatory (Treg), Natural-Killer (NK) and NK T-cells were counted using flow cytometry. Results: At enrollment, patients with respiratory failure, characterized by DXM failure (intubation/death) or DXM success (hospital discharge) exhibited significantly fewer CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells and B-lymphocytes compared to the control group (no respiratory failure/no DXM). At the time of treatment completion, the DXM-failure group exhibited significantly fewer CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells, memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, compared to the control and the DXM-success groups and fewer activated CD4+ T-lymphocytes, Tregs and NK cells compared to the control group. At the time of treatment completion, the number of all investigated lymphocyte subsets increased in the DXM-success group and was similar to those of the control group. NK cells significantly decreased over time in the DXM-failure group. Conclusion: The lymphocyte kinetics differ between DXM-treated and control COVID-19 patients and are associated with clinical outcomes.