Aims: A majority of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) present without typical ST elevation. One-third of non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients have an acutely occluded culprit coronary artery [occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI)], leading to poor outcomes due to delayed identification and invasive management. In this study, we sought to develop a versatile artificial intelligence (AI) model detecting acute OMI on single-standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and compare its performance with existing state-of-the-art diagnostic criteria. Methods and results: An AI model was developed using 18 616 ECGs from 10 543 patients with suspected ACS from an international database with clinically validated outcomes. The model was evaluated in an international cohort and compared with STEMI criteria and ECG experts in detecting OMI. The primary outcome of OMI was an acutely occluded or flow-limiting culprit artery requiring emergent revascularization. In the overall test set of 3254 ECGs from 2222 patients (age 62 ± 14 years, 67% males, 21.6% OMI), the AI model achieved an area under the curve of 0.938 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924–0.951] in identifying the primary OMI outcome, with superior performance [accuracy 90.9% (95% CI: 89.7–92.0), sensitivity 80.6% (95% CI: 76.8–84.0), and specificity 93.7 (95% CI: 92.6–94.8)] compared with STEMI criteria [accuracy 83.6% (95% CI: 82.1–85.1), sensitivity 32.5% (95% CI: 28.4–36.6), and specificity 97.7% (95% CI: 97.0–98.3)] and with similar performance compared with ECG experts [accuracy 90.8% (95% CI: 89.5–91.9), sensitivity 73.0% (95% CI: 68.7–77.0), and specificity 95.7% (95% CI: 94.7–96.6)]. Conclusion: The present novel ECG AI model demonstrates superior accuracy to detect acute OMI when compared with STEMI criteria. This suggests its potential to improve ACS triage, ensuring appropriate and timely referral for immediate revascularization.

Aims : Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high mortality rates and has inconclusive recommendations in clinical guidelines. We aimed to report the international experience of patients with secondary MR following acute MI and compare the outcomes of those treated conservatively, surgically, and percutaneously. Methods and results : Retrospective international registry of consecutive patients with at least moderate-to-severe MR following MI treated in 21 centres in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The registry included patients treated conservatively and those having surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) or percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using edge-to-edge repair. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A total of 471 patients were included (43% female, age 73 ± 11 years): 205 underwent interventions, of whom 106 were SMVR and 99 PMVR. Patients who underwent mitral valve intervention were in a worse clinical state (Killip class ≥3 in 60% vs. 43%, P < 0.01), but yet had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with those treated conservatively [11% vs. 27%, P < 0.01 and 16% vs. 35%, P < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.46, P < 0.01]. Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement was performed earlier than PMVR [median of 12 days from MI date (interquartile range 5–19) vs. 19 days (10–40), P < 0.01]. The immediate procedural success did not differ between SMVR and PMVR (92% vs. 93%, P = 0.53). However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher in SMVR than in PMVR (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.03 and 31% vs. 17%, P = 0.04; adjusted HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.55–9.07, P < 0.01). Conclusions : Early intervention may mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR. Percutaneous mitral valve repair can serve as an alternative for surgery in reducing MR for high-risk patients.

Patients with heart failure (HF) are at an increased risk of hospital admissions. The aim of this report is to describe the feasibility, safety and accuracy of a novel wireless left atrial pressure (LAP) monitoring system in patients with HF. The V-LAP Left Atrium Monitoring systEm for Patients With Chronic sysTOlic & Diastolic Congestive heart Failure (VECTOR-HF) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in human clinical trial to assess the safety, performance and usability of the V-LAP system (Vectorious Medical Technologies) in patients with New York Heart Association class III HF. The device was implanted in the interatrial septum via a percutaneous, trans-septal approach guided by fluoroscopy and echocardiography. Primary endpoints included the successful deployment of the implant, the ability to perform initial pressure measurements and safety outcomes. To date, 24 patients have received implants of the LAP-monitoring device. No device-related complications have occurred. LAP was reported accurately, agreeing well with wedge pressure at 3 months (Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.850). After 6 months, New York Heart Association class improved in 40% of the patients (95% CI = 16.4%-63.5%), while the 6-minute walk test distance had not changed significantly (313.9 ± 144.9 vs 232.5 ± 129.9 meters; P = 0.076). The V-LAP left atrium monitoring system appears to be safe and accurate.

Objectives: Patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) have an increased risk of atherothrombotic complications. There are limited data regarding the outcome of patients with APS who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accordingly, we aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of these patients. Methods: Nineteen APS patients who underwent PCI between the years 2003 and 2008 were compared to 380 patients who had undergone PCI during the same period (PCI group) and were matched by age (±5 years), gender, diabetes and hypertension. In addition, APS patients were compared to 1,458 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) who were treated with PCI during the same period. Six-month to 4-year clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The indication for PCI in the APS group was acute coronary syndrome in 52.6% of patients. After 1 year of follow-up, patients with APS had higher rates of target vessel revascularization than the other two groups, which translated to higher rates of major adverse cardiac events. There were no differences in MI or mortality rates between the groups. Conclusions: Patients with APS who undergo PCI have worse long-term clinical outcomes, driven by higher rates of revascularization, than other patients undergoing PCI. Further study is warranted to examine the mechanisms underlying these findings.