Vijay Singh

Prof. Vijay Singh

Division of Radioprotectants, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road Bethesda 20814, MD, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 1999 in Immunologic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
SMS. Mehrotra
S. Mehrotra
SAS. S. Agarwal
S. S. Agarwal

1 January 2005 in Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VYV. S. Yadav
V. S. Yadav
KMK. P. Mishra
K. P. Mishra
DSD. P. Singh
D. P. Singh
SMS. Mehrotra
S. Mehrotra
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), found in the spice turmeric, exhibits anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and chemopreventive activities. However, the effect of curcumin on the immunological responses largely remains unknown. In this study we have investigated the effect of curcumin on mitogen (phytohaemagglutinin; PHA) stimulated T-cell proliferation, natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity, production of cytokines by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), nitric oxide (NO) production in mouse macrophage cells, RAW-264.7. Furthermore, we have carried out an electromobility shift assay to elucidate the mechanism of action of curcumin at DNA protein interaction level. We observed that curcumin inhibits PHA-induced T-cell proliferation, interleukin-2 production, NO generation, and lipopolysachharide-induced nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and augments NK cell cytotoxicity. Our results suggest that curcumin most likely inhibits cell proliferation and cytokine production by inhibiting NF-κB target genes involved in the induction of these immune parameters.

26 June 2017 in International Journal of Radiation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
TSThomas M. Seed
Thomas M. Seed
Purpose: The increasing global risk of nuclear and radiological accidents or attacks has driven renewed research interest in developing medical countermeasures to potentially injurious exposures to acute irradiation. Clinical symptoms and signs of a developing acute radiation injury, i.e. the acute radiation syndrome, are grouped into three sub-syndromes named after the dominant organ system affected, namely the hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, and neurovascular systems. The availability of safe and effective countermeasures against the above threats currently represents a significant unmet medical need. This is the first article within a three-part series covering the nature of the radiation sub-syndromes, various animal models for radiation countermeasure development, and the agents currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for countering the medical consequences of several of these prominent radiation exposure-associated syndromes. Conclusions: From the U.S. and global perspectives, biomedical research concerning medical countermeasure development is quite robust, largely due to increased government funding following the 9/11 incidence and subsequent rise of terrorist-associated threats. A wide spectrum of radiation countermeasures for specific types of radiation injuries is currently under investigation. However, only a few radiation countermeasures have been fully approved by regulatory agencies for human use during radiological/nuclear contingencies. Additional research effort, with additional funding, clearly will be needed in order to fill this significant, unmet medical health problem.

17 September 2019 in Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
TSThomas M. Seed
Thomas M. Seed
Introduction: A radiation countermeasure that can be used prior to radiation exposure to protect the population from the harmful effects of radiation exposure remains a major unmet medical need and is recognized as an important area for research. Despite substantial advances in the research and development for finding nontoxic, safe, and effective prophylactic countermeasures for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS), no such agent has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Area covered: Despite the progress made to improve the effectiveness of amifostine as a radioprotector for ARS, none of the strategies have resolved the issue of its toxicity/side effects. Thus, the FDA has approved amifostine for limited clinical indications, but not for non-clinical uses. This article reviews recent strategies and progress that have been made to move forward this potentially useful countermeasure for ARS. Expert opinion: Although the recent investigations have been promising for fielding safe and effective radiation countermeasures, additional work is needed to improve and advance drug design and delivery strategies to get FDA approval for broadened, non-clinical use of amifostine during a radiological/nuclear scenario.

1 June 2015 in Health Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
PRPatricia L.P. Romaine
Patricia L.P. Romaine
TSThomas M. Seed
Thomas M. Seed
World events over the past decade have highlighted the threat of nuclear terrorism as well as an urgent need to develop radiation countermeasures for acute radiation exposures and subsequent bodily injuries. An increased probability of radiological or nuclear incidents due to detonation of nuclear weapons by terrorists, sabotage of nuclear facilities, dispersal and exposure to radioactive materials, and accidents provides the basis for such enhanced radiation exposure risks for civilian populations. Although the search for suitable radiation countermeasures for radiation-associated injuries was initiated more than half a century ago, no safe and effective radiation countermeasure for the most severe of these injuries, namely acute radiation syndrome (ARS), has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The dearth of FDA-approved radiation countermeasures has prompted intensified research for a new generation of radiation countermeasures. In this communication, the authors have listed and reviewed the status of radiation countermeasures that are currently available for use, or those that might be used for exceptional nuclear/radiological contingencies, plus a limited few medicines that show early promise but still remain experimental in nature and unauthorized for human use by the FDA.

1 August 1990 in American Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarc D. De Smet
Marc D. De Smet
JYJoyce H. Yamamoto
Joyce H. Yamamoto
MMManabu Mochizuki
Manabu Mochizuki
IGIgal Gery
Igal Gery
Vijay SinghVijay Singh
Vijay Singh
RNRobert B. Nussenblatt
Robert B. Nussenblatt