This guideline provides recommendations for the use of PET imaging in gliomas. The review examines established clinical benefit in glioma patients of PET using glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and amino acid tracers (¹¹C-MET, ¹⁸F-FET, and ¹⁸F-FDOPA). An increasing number of studies have been published on PET imaging in the setting of diagnosis, biopsy, and resection as well radiotherapy planning, treatment monitoring, and response assessment. Recommendations are based on evidence generated from studies which validated PET findings by histology or clinical course. This guideline emphasizes the clinical value of PET imaging with superiority of amino acid PET over glucose PET and provides a framework for the use of PET to assist in the management of patients with gliomas.

Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (1) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (2) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit. The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from 7 neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and postoperative MRI were collected. We collected 1,008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC-26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm³) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with “maximal CE resection” (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with “submaximal CE resection” (class 3) or “biopsy” (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm³ residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 (“supramaximal CE resection”). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers. The proposed “RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma” are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such “supramaximal CE resection.”

Surgical resection represents the standard of care in diffuse glioma, and more extensive tumour resection appears to be associated with favourable outcome. Up to now, terminology to describe extent of resection has been inconsistently applied across clinical trials which hampers comparative analysis of cohorts between different studies. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we developed evidence-based expert recommendations on categories for extent of resection. Recommendations are formulated for the categories 'biopsy', 'partial resection', 'subtotal resection', 'near total resection', 'complete resection' and 'supramaximal resection'. Definitions rest on reduction of contrast- and non-contrast-enhancing tumour in glioblastoma, and on reduction of T2/FLAIR-hyperintense tumour in gliomas WHO grade 2 or 3. Both relative reduction of tumour volume (in percentage) as a measurement of surgical efficacy and absolute residual tumour volume (in cm3) as a measurement of remaining tumour burden are incorporated into the categories for extent of resection. Class of evidence for the proposed categories ranges from class IIB to IV. Limitations of the suggested categories are discussed. The proposed categories on extent of resection offer a framework to standardize nomenclature based on previous studies, and will need to be evaluated in prospective, molecularly well-defined cohorts. Our categories may eventually help as a stratification factor for future clinical trials.

This prospective multicenter study assessed the prognostic influence of the extent of resection when compared with biopsy only in a contemporary patient population with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Histology, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and clinical data were centrally analyzed. Survival analyses were carried out with the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed with proportional hazard models. Of 345 patients, 273 underwent open tumor resection and 72 biopsies; 125 patients had gross total resections (GTRs) and 148, incomplete resections. Surgery-related morbidity was lower after biopsy (1.4% versus 12.1%, P = 0.007). 64.3% of patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT plus CT), 20.0% RT alone, 4.3% CT alone, and 11.3% best supportive care as an initial treatment. Patients ≤60 years with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥90 were more likely to receive RT plus CT (P < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) (progression free survival; PFS) ranged from 33.2 months (15 months) for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors after GTR and RT plus CT to 3.0 months (2.4 months) for biopsied patients receiving supportive care only. Favorable prognostic factors in multivariate analyses for OS were age ≤60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; P < 0.001], preoperative KPS of ≥80 (HR = 0.55; P < 0.001), GTR (HR = 0.60; P = 0.003), MGMT promoter methylation (HR = 0.44; P < 0.001), and RT plus CT (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001); patients undergoing incomplete resection did not better than those receiving biopsy only (HR = 0.85; P = 0.31). The value of incomplete resection remains questionable. If GTR cannot be safely achieved, biopsy only might be used as an alternative surgical strategy.

Objective: The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to identify static and dynamic O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET (¹⁸FET-PET)-derived imaging biomarkers in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: Seventy-nine patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included; 42 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy (unresectable tumors) and 37 patients microsurgical tumor resection. All patients were scheduled to receive radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (RCx/TMZ). ¹⁸FET-PET evaluation using static and dynamic analysis was done before biopsy/resection, after resection, 4 to 6 weeks following RCx, and after 3 cycles of TMZ. Endpoints were survival and progression-free-survival. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazards models. Results: Biological tumor volume before RCx (BTV_preRCx) was the most important ¹⁸FET-PET–derived imaging biomarker and was independent of MGMT promoter methylation and clinical prognostic factors: patients with smaller BTV_preRCx had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival (OS). ¹⁸FET time-activity curves (TACs) before treatment and their changes after RCx were also related to outcome; patients with initially increasing TACs experienced longer OS. Conclusion: BTV_preRCx and TAC represent important ¹⁸FET-PET–derived imaging biomarkers in GBM. Increasing TACs are associated with prolonged OS. The BTV_preRCx is a strong prognostic factor for progression-free survival and OS independent of the mode of surgery. Our data furthermore suggest that patients harboring resectable GBM might benefit from maximal PET-guided tumor resection.