Hong Liu

Dr. Hong Liu

Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu. China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2021 in Soil Use and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZZZheng-kun Zhang
Zheng-kun Zhang
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
XLXiaoxiao Liu
Xiaoxiao Liu
YCYong Chen
Yong Chen
YLYang Lu
Yang Lu
JLJian-Gang Li
Jian-Gang Li

25 April 2021 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMin-Chong Shen
Min-Chong Shen
JLJian-Gang Li
Jian-Gang Li
YDYuanhua Dong
Yuanhua Dong
ZZZheng-kun Zhang
Zheng-kun Zhang
YZYu Zhao
Yu Zhao
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
The bacterial community of rhizosphere soil maintains soil properties, regulates the microbiome, improves productivity, and sustains agriculture. However, the structure and function of bacterial communities have been interrupted or destroyed by unreasonable agricultural practices, especially the excessive use of chemical fertilizers. Microbial inoculants, regarded as harmless, effective, and environmentally friendly amendments, are receiving more attention. Herein, the effects of three microbial inoculants, inoculant M and two commercial inoculants (A and S), on bacterial communities of maize rhizosphere soil under three nitrogen application rates were compared. Bacterial communities treated with the inoculants were different from those of the non-inoculant control. The OTU (operational taxonomic unit) numbers and alpha diversity indices were decreased by three inoculants, except for the application of inoculant M in CF group. Beta diversity showed the different structures of bacterial communities changed by three inoculants compared with control. Furthermore, key phylotypes analyses exhibited the differences of biomarkers between different treatments visually. Overall, inoculant M had shared and unique abilities of regulating bacterial communities compared with the other two inoculants by increasing potentially beneficial bacteria and decreasing the negative. This work provides a theoretical basis for the application of microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture.

27 May 2021 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMin-Chong Shen
Min-Chong Shen
JLJian-Gang Li
Jian-Gang Li
YDYuanhua Dong
Yuanhua Dong
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
JPJunwei Peng
Junwei Peng
YSYang Sun
Yang Sun
Microbial treatment has recently been attracting attention as a sustainable agricultural strategy addressing the current problems caused by unreasonable agricultural practices. However, the mechanism through which microbial inoculants promote plant growth is not well understood. In this study, two phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) were screened, and their growth-promoting abilities were explored. At day 7 (D7), the lengths of the root and sprout with three microbial treatments, M16, M44, and the combination of M16 and M44 (Com), were significantly greater than those with the non-microbial control, with mean values of 9.08 and 4.73, 7.15 and 4.83, and 13.98 and 5.68 cm, respectively. At day 14 (D14), M16, M44, and Com significantly increased not only the length of the root and sprout but also the underground and aboveground biomass. Differential metabolites were identified, and various amino acids, amino acid derivatives, and other plant growth-regulating molecules were significantly enhanced by the three microbial treatments. The profiling of key metabolites associated with plant growth in different microbial treatments showed consistent results with their performances in the germination experiment, which revealed the metabolic mechanism of plant growth-promoting processes mediated by screened PSB. This study provides a theoretical basis for the application of PSB in sustainable agriculture.

24 April 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
FSFeifei Sun
Feifei Sun
JPJunwei Peng
Junwei Peng
MSMin-Chong Shen
Min-Chong Shen
JLJian-Gang Li
Jian-Gang Li
YDYuanhua Dong
Yuanhua Dong
Soil microbial communities are closely associated with ecosystem functions. However, unravelling the complex nature of the microbial world and successfully utilizing all positive interactions for multipurpose environmental benefits is still a major challenge. Here, we describe the soil bacterial communities in different niches of healthy and diseased tomatoes under natural conditions. A higher abundance of the pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and lower bacterial diversity were observed in the disease samples. The healthy tomato rhizosphere harbored more plant-beneficial microbes, including Bacillus and Streptomyces. Also, the co-occurrence network in the healthy rhizosphere samples was more complicated, so as to better adapt to the soil-borne pathogen invasion. Both the beta nearest-taxon-index (βNTI) and normalized stochasticity ratio (NST) analyses demonstrated that healthy rhizosphere communities were less phylogenetically clustered and mainly dominated by dispersal limitation, while homogeneous selection was the major assembly process driving the rhizosphere community of diseased samples. The results obtained with community assembly methods and co-occurrence network analysis revealed that healthy rhizosphere bacterial communities possessed potentially broader environmental stress (soil-borne pathogen stress) adaptability compared with diseased rhizosphere bacterial communities. In conclusion, this study contributed to widening our understanding of the potential mechanisms of soil bacterial community composition and assembly responding to soil-borne pathogen invasion.

12 July 2021 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJunwei Peng
Junwei Peng
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
MSMinchong Shen
Minchong Shen
RCRuihuan Chen
Ruihuan Chen
JLJian-Gang Li
Jian-Gang Li
YDYuanhua Dong
Yuanhua Dong

6 April 2025 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJunwei Peng
Junwei Peng
JHJinfeng Hou
Jinfeng Hou
HLHong Liu
Hong Liu
DMDmitri V. Mavrodi
Dmitri V. Mavrodi
OMOlga V. Mavrodi
Olga V. Mavrodi
JLJiangang Li
Jiangang Li