Alessandro Moiraghi

Dr. Alessandro Moiraghi

1. Department of Neurosurgery, GHU-Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hôpital Sainte Anne, F-75014 Paris, France
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 June 2014 in Journal of Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Prada
Francesco Prada
MBMassimiliano Del Bene
Massimiliano Del Bene
LMLuca Mattei
Luca Mattei
CCCecilia Casali
Cecilia Casali
AFAssunta Filippini
Assunta Filippini
FMFrancesco Di Meco
Francesco Di Meco

25 May 2015 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Prada
Francesco Prada
MBMassimiliano Del Bene
Massimiliano Del Bene
AMAlessandro Moiraghi
Alessandro Moiraghi
CCCecilia Casali
Cecilia Casali
FLFederico Giuseppe Legnani
Federico Giuseppe Legnani
FMFrancesco Di Meco
Francesco Di Meco
The main goal in meningioma surgery is to achieve complete tumor removal, when possible, while improving or preserving patient neurological functions. Intraoperative imaging guidance is one fundamental tool for such achievement. In this regard, intra-operative ultrasound (ioUS) is a reliable solution to obtain real-time information during surgery and it has been applied in many different aspect of neurosurgery. In the last years, different ioUS modalities have been described: B-mode, Fusion Imaging with pre-operative acquired MRI, Doppler, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and elastosonography. In this paper, we present our US based multimodal approach in meningioma surgery. We describe all the most relevant ioUS modalities and their intraoperative application to obtain precise and specific information regarding the lesion for a tailored approach in meningioma surgery. For each modality, we perform a review of the literature accompanied by a pictorial essay based on our routinely use of ioUS for meningioma resection.

21 August 2019 in Operative Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlessandro Moiraghi
Alessandro Moiraghi
FPFrancesco Prada
Francesco Prada
ADAlberto Delaidelli
Alberto Delaidelli
RGRamona Guatta
Ramona Guatta
AMAdrien May
Adrien May
FDFrancesco DiMeco
Francesco DiMeco
BACKGROUND: Maximizing extent of resection (EOR) and reducing residual tumor volume (RTV) while preserving neurological functions is the main goal in the surgical treatment of gliomas. Navigated intraoperative ultrasound (N-ioUS) combining the advantages of ultrasound and conventional neuronavigation (NN) allows for overcoming the limitations of the latter. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time NN combining ioUS and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on maximizing EOR in glioma surgery compared to standard NN. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 60 cases operated on for supratentorial gliomas: 31 operated under the guidance of N-ioUS and 29 resected with standard NN. Age, location of the tumor, pre- and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), EOR, RTV, and, if any, postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of gross total resection (GTR) in NN group was 44.8% vs 61.2% in N-ioUS group. The rate of RTV > 1 cm3 for glioblastomas was significantly lower for the N-ioUS group (P < .01). In 13/31 (42%), RTV was detected at the end of surgery with N-ioUS. In 8 of 13 cases, (25.8% of the cohort) surgeons continued with the operation until complete resection. Specificity was greater in N-ioUS (42% vs 31%) and negative predictive value (73% vs 54%). At discharge, the difference between pre- and postoperative KPS was significantly higher for the N-ioUS (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The use of an N-ioUS-based real-time has been beneficial for resection in noneloquent high-grade glioma in terms of both EOR and neurological outcome, compared to standard NN. N-ioUS has proven usefulness in detecting RTV > 1 cm3.

1 December 2015 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFrancesco Prada
Francesco Prada
MBMassimiliano Del Bene
Massimiliano Del Bene
CCCecilia Casali
Cecilia Casali
ASAndrea Saladino
Andrea Saladino
FLFederico Giuseppe Legnani
Federico Giuseppe Legnani
FMFrancesco Di Meco
Francesco Di Meco

11 January 2022 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJohan Pallud
Johan Pallud
GHGilles Huberfeld
Gilles Huberfeld
EDEdouard Dezamis
Edouard Dezamis
SPSophie Peeters
Sophie Peeters
AMAlessandro Moiraghi
Alessandro Moiraghi
MZMarc Zanello
Marc Zanello
Objectives. The association between Levetiracetam and survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastomas is controversial. We investigated whether the duration of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol impacts overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. Methods. Observational single-institution cohort study (2010-2018). Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥18 years old; 2) newly diagnosed supratentorial tumor; 3) histomolecular diagnosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma; 4) standard chemoradiation protocol. To assess the survival benefit of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol (whole duration, part time, and never subgroups), a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed. We performed a case-matched analysis (1:1) between patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol and patients with Levetiracetam use part time or never according to the following criteria: sex, age, epileptic seizures at diagnosis, RTOG-RPA class, tumor location, preoperative volume, extent of resection, and O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status. Patients with unavailable O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status (48.5%) were excluded. Results. 460 patients were included. The median overall survival was longer in the 116 patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (21.0 months; 95%CI, 17.2-24.0) than in the 126 patients with part time Levetiracetam use (16.8 months; 95%CI, 12.4-19.0], and in the 218 patients who never received Levetiracetam (16.0 months; 95%CI, 15.5-19.4; p=0.027). Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.69; 95%CI, 0.52-0.93; p=0.014), O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (aHR 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.71; p<0.001), and gross total tumor resection (aHR 0.57; 95%CI, 0.44-0.74; p<0.001) were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. After case matching (n=54 per group), a longer overall survival was found for Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (HR=0.63; 95%CI, 0.42-0.94, p=0.023). Discussion. Levetiracetam use during the whole standard chemoradiation protocol possibly improves overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. It should be considered in the anti-tumor strategy of future multicentric trials. Classification of Evidence. This study provides Class III evidence that in individuals with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, levetiracetam use throughout the duration of standard chemotherapy is associated with longer median overall survival.

10 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlessandro Moiraghi
Alessandro Moiraghi
ARAlexandre Roux
Alexandre Roux
SPSophie Peeters
Sophie Peeters
JPJean-Baptiste Pelletier
Jean-Baptiste Pelletier
MBMarwan Baroud
Marwan Baroud
JPJohan Pallud
Johan Pallud
Background: Although awake resection using intraoperative cortico-subcortical functional brain mapping is the benchmark technique for diffuse gliomas within eloquent brain areas, it is still rarely proposed for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. We have assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of awake resection for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Methods: Observational single-institution cohort (2012–2018) of 453 adult patients harboring supratentorial IDH-wildtype glioblastomas who benefited from awake resection, from asleep resection, or from a biopsy. Case matching (1:1) criteria between the awake group and asleep group: gender, age, RTOG-RPA class, tumor side, location and volume and neurosurgeon experience. Results: In patients in the awake resection subgroup (n = 42), supratotal resections were more frequent (21.4% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.0001) while partial resections were less frequent (21.4% vs. 40.1%, p < 0.0001) compared to the asleep (n = 222) resection subgroup. In multivariable analyses, postoperative standard radiochemistry (aHR = 0.04, p < 0.0001), supratotal resection (aHR = 0.27, p = 0.0021), total resection (aHR = 0.43, p < 0.0001), KPS score > 70 (HR = 0.66, p = 0.0013), MGMT promoter methylation (HR = 0.55, p = 0.0031), and awake surgery (HR = 0.54, p = 0.0156) were independent predictors of overall survival. After case matching, a longer overall survival was found for awake resection (HR = 0.47, p = 0.0103). Conclusions: Awake resection is safe, allows larger resections than asleep surgery, and positively impacts overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in selected adult patients.