The CD38-targeting antibody daratumumab mediates its anti-myeloma activities not only through Fc-receptor-dependent effector mechanisms, but also by its effects on T-cell immunity through depletion of CD38⁺ regulatory T-cells, regulatory B-cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Therefore, combining daratumumab with modulators of other potent immune inhibitory pathways, such as the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, may further improve its efficacy. We show that multiple myeloma (MM) cells from relapsed/refractory patients have increased expression of PD-L1, compared to newly diagnosed patients. Furthermore, PD-1 is upregulated on T-cells from both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM patients, compared to healthy controls. In short-term experiments with bone marrow samples from MM patients, daratumumab-mediated lysis was mainly associated with the MM cells’ CD38 expression levels and the effector (NK-cells/monocytes/T-cells)-to-target ratio, but not with the PD-L1 expression levels or PD-1⁺ T-cell frequencies. Although PD-1 blockade with nivolumab did not affect MM cell viability or enhanced daratumumab-mediated lysis in short-term ex vivo experiments, nivolumab resulted in a mild but clear increase in T-cell numbers. Moreover, with a longer treatment duration, PD-1 blockade markedly improved anti-CD38 antibody-mediated cytotoxicity in vivo in murine CD38⁺ tumor models. In conclusion, dual targeting of CD38 and PD-1 may represent a promising strategy for treating MM and other CD38-positive malignancies.

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually develop multi-drug-resistant disease with poor survival. Hence, the development of novel treatment strategies is of great importance. Recently, different classes of immunotherapeutic agents have shown great promise in heavily pre-treated MM, including T cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). These BsAbs simultaneously interact with CD3 on effector T cells and a tumor-associated antigen on MM cells, resulting in redirection of T cells to MM cells. This leads to the formation of an immunologic synapse, the release of granzymes/perforins, and subsequent tumor cell lysis. Several ongoing phase 1 studies show substantial activity and a favorable toxicity profile with BCMA-, GPRC5D-, or FcRH5-targeting BsAbs in heavily pre-treated MM patients. Resistance mechanisms against BsAbs include tumor-related features, T cell characteristics, and impact of components of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Various clinical trials are currently evaluating combination therapy with a BsAb and another agent, such as a CD38-targeting antibody or an immunomodulatory drug (e.g., pomalidomide), to further improve response depth and duration. Additionally, the combination of two BsAbs, simultaneously targeting two different antigens to prevent antigen escape, is being explored in clinical studies. The evaluation of BsAbs in earlier lines of therapy, including newly diagnosed MM, is warranted, based on the efficacy of BsAbs in advanced MM.

Daratumumab is active both as a single agent and in combination with other agents in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the majority of patients will develop daratumumab-refractory disease, which carries a poor prognosis. Since daratumumab also has immunomodulatory effects, addition of the PD-L1 blocking antibody durvalumab at the time of progression may reverse daratumumab-resistance. The efficacy and safety of daratumumab and durvalumab in daratumumab-refractory relapsed/refractory MM patients was evaluated in this prospective, single-arm phase 2 study (NCT03000452). None of the 18 enrolled patients achieved PR or better. The frequency of serious adverse events was 38.9%, with one patient experiencing an immune related adverse event (grade 2 hyperthyroidism). No infusion-related reactions were observed. Analysis of tumor- and immune cell characteristics was performed on bone marrow samples obtained at baseline and during treatment. Daratumumab combined with durvalumab reduced the frequency of regulatory T-cells and decreased the proportion of T-cells expressing LAG3 and CD8⁺ T-cells expressing TIM-3, without altering T- and NK-cell frequencies. Durvalumab did not affect tumor cell characteristics associated with daratumumab resistance. In conclusion, the addition of durvalumab to daratumumab following development of daratumumab-resistance was associated with an acceptable toxicity profile, but was not effective. This indicates that inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway at the time of daratumumab-resistance is insufficient to reverse daratumumab-resistance.