Background: Release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction, as a result of microvascular obstruction via pro‐inflammatory and prothrombotic pathways. Colchicine is a well‐established anti‐inflammatory agent with growing evidence to support use in patients with coronary disease. However, its effects on post‐PCI NET formation in ACS have not been explored. Methods and Results: Sixty patients (40 ACS; 20 stable angina pectoris) were prospectively recruited and allocated to colchicine or no treatment. Within 24 hours of treatment, serial coronary sinus blood samples were collected during PCI. Isolated neutrophils from 10 patients with ACS post‐PCI and 4 healthy controls were treated in vitro with colchicine (25 nmol/L) and stimulated with either ionomycin (5 μmol/L) or phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (50 nmol/L). Extracellular DNA was quantified using Sytox Green and fixed cells were stained with Hoechst 3342 and anti‐alpha tubulin. Baseline characteristics were similar across both treatment and control arms. Patients with ACS had higher NET release versus patients with stable angina pectoris ( P <0.001), which was reduced with colchicine treatment (area under the curve: 0.58 versus 4.29; P <0.001). In vitro, colchicine suppressed unstimulated ( P <0.001), phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate–induced ( P =0.009) and ionomycin‐induced ( P =0.002) NET formation in neutrophils isolated from patients with ACS post‐PCI, but not healthy controls. Tubulin organization was impaired in neutrophils from patients with ACS but was restored by colchicine treatment. Conclusions: Colchicine suppresses NET formation in patients with ACS post‐PCI by restoring cytoskeletal dynamics. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized trials powered for clinical end points. Registration: URL: https://anzctr.org.au ; Unique identifier: ACTRN12619001231134.

Periprocedural myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI) are not infrequent complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are associated with greater short- and long-term mortality. There is an abundance of preclinical and observational data demonstrating that high levels of pre-, intra- and post-procedural inflammation are associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis as well as future ischaemic events, heart failure hospitalisations and cardiac-related mortality. Beyond inflammation associated with the underlying coronary pathology, PCI itself elicits an acute inflammatory response. PCI-induced inflammation is driven by a combination of direct endothelial damage, liberation of intra-plaque proinflammatory debris and reperfusion injury. Therefore, anti-inflammatory medications, such as colchicine, may provide a novel means of improving PCI outcomes in both the short- and long-term. This review summarises periprocedural MI epidemiology and pathophysiology, evaluates the prognostic value of pre-, intra- and post-procedural inflammation, dissects the mechanisms involved in the acute inflammatory response to PCI and discusses the potential for periprocedural anti-inflammatory treatment.

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a peptide hormone involved in energy homeostasis that protects against the development of obesity and diabetes in animal models. Its level is elevated in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in humans. However, little is known about the role of FGF21 in heart failure (HF). HF is a major global health problem with a prevalence that is predicted to rise, especially in ageing populations. Despite improved therapies, mortality due to HF remains high, and given its insidious onset, prediction of its development is challenging for physicians. The emergence of cardiac biomarkers to improve prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of HF has received much attention over the past decade. Recent studies have suggested FGF21 is a promising biomarker candidate for HF. Preclinical research has shown that FGF21 is involved in the pathophysiology of HF through the prevention of oxidative stress, cardiac hypertrophy, and inflammation in cardiomyocytes. However, in the available clinical literature, FGF21 levels appear to be paradoxically raised in HF, potentially implying a FGF21 resistant state as occurs in obesity. Several potential confounding variables complicate the verdict on whether FGF21 is of clinical value as a biomarker. Further research is thus needed to evaluate whether FGF21 has a causal role in HF, and whether circulating FGF21 can be used as a biomarker to improve the prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of HF. This review draws from preclinical and clinical studies to explore the role of FGF21 in HF.

Atherosclerosis is complex chronic disease characterized by intimal cholesterol accumulation and vascular inflammation. There is a well-established relationship of hypercholesterolemia and inflammation with atherosclerosis. However, the link between inflammation and cholesterol is not completely understood. Myeloid cells, in particular, monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils play essential roles in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It is well known that macrophages accumulate cholesterol, forming foam cells, which drive atherosclerosis-associated inflammation. However, the interaction between cholesterol and neutrophils remains poorly defined—an important gap in the literature given that neutrophils represent up to 70% of total circulating leukocytes in humans. Elevated levels of biomarkers of neutrophil activation (myeloperoxidase and neutrophil extracellular traps) and higher absolute neutrophil counts are both associated with increased rates of cardiovascular events. Neutrophils contain the necessary machinery to uptake, synthesize, efflux and esterify cholesterol; yet, the functional consequence of dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis on neutrophil activity remains poorly defined. Preclinical animal data suggest a direct link between cholesterol metabolism and hematopoiesis, although current evidence in humans has been unable to corroborate such findings. This review will explore the impact of impaired cholesterol homeostasis neutrophils and draw focus on the discordant data from animal models and atherosclerotic disease in humans.

Aims: Colchicine has recently been approved for the treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Since then, three large trials of colchicine in ASCVD have failed to reach their primary endpoints. Methods and results: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024616378). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular death. The key secondary endpoint of extended MACE (eMACE) was defined as MACE plus coronary revascularisation. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model and are presented as risk ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]. 1624 articles were screened. 12 met inclusion criteria, yet one trial reported zero endpoint events in both arms. As such, 11 trials were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 1983 primary endpoint events across 30 808 participants. Colchicine was associated with a 17% reduction in the incidence of MACE [0.83 (0.73, 0.95); P = 0.006] and 23% reduction in the incidence of eMACE [0.77 (0.63, 0.94); P = 0.01]. This reduction was driven by a lower rate of MI [0.78 (0.63, 0.95); P = 0.02] and coronary revascularisation [0.73 (0.55, 0.97); P = 0.03]. There were also numerically fewer strokes in the colchicine-treated population [0.81 (0.63, 1.04); P = 0.11]. Colchicine had no effect on cardiovascular [0.96 (0.79, 1.15); P = 0.64] or non-cardiovascular mortality [1.04 (0.76, 1.41); P = 0.81]. Conclusion: Colchicine reduces the risk of non-fatal ischaemic events in patients with ASCVD. Further studies are required to identify a population(s) who stands to benefit most from this promising therapy.