Matias Takala

Dr. Matias Takala

Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2011 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMatias Takala
Matias Takala
KLKari Luojus
Kari Luojus
JPJouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen
CDChris Derksen
Chris Derksen
JLJuha Lemmetyinen
Juha Lemmetyinen
BBBojan Bojkov
Bojan Bojkov

20 May 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen
KLKari Luojus
Kari Luojus
CDChris Derksen
Chris Derksen
LMLawrence Mudryk
Lawrence Mudryk
JLJuha Lemmetyinen
Juha Lemmetyinen
JNJohannes Norberg
Johannes Norberg

1 March 2004 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM Tedesco
M Tedesco
JPJouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen
MTMatias Takala
Matias Takala
MHM Hallikainen
M Hallikainen
PPP Pampaloni
P Pampaloni

2 October 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen
MAMika Aurela
Mika Aurela
TLTuomas Laurila
Tuomas Laurila
TATuula Aalto
Tuula Aalto
MTMatias Takala
Matias Takala
TVTimo Vesala
Timo Vesala
Significance: We quantified a 36-y trend of advanced spring recovery of carbon uptake across the northern hemisphere boreal evergreen forest zone. From this trend, we estimated the corresponding change in global gross primary production (GPP) and further quantified the magnitude and spatiotemporal variability of spring GPP, that is, the cross-photosynthetic carbon uptake by forest. Our main findings are the following: ( i ) We developed a proxy indicator for spring recovery from in situ flux data on CO 2 exchange and recent satellite snowmelt products and ( ii ) we established a relation between spring recovery and carbon uptake to assess changes in springtime carbon exchange showing a major advance in the CO 2 sink.

3 June 2020 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJianwei Yang
Jianwei Yang
LJLingmei Jiang
Lingmei Jiang
KLKari Luojus
Kari Luojus
JPJinmei Pan
Jinmei Pan
JLJuha Lemmetyinen
Juha Lemmetyinen
Shengli WuShengli Wu
Shengli Wu
We investigated the potential capability of the random forest (RF) machine learning (ML) model to estimate snow depth in this work. Four combinations composed of critical predictor variables were used to train the RF model. Then, we utilized three validation datasets from out-of-bag (OOB) samples, a temporal subset, and a spatiotemporal subset to verify the fitted RF algorithms. The results indicated the following: (1) the accuracy of the RF model is greatly influenced by geographic location, elevation, and land cover fractions; (2) however, the redundant predictor variables (if highly correlated) slightly affect the RF model; and (3) the fitted RF algorithms perform better on temporal than spatial scales, with unbiased root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of ∼4.4 and ∼7.3 cm, respectively. Finally, we used the fitted RF2 algorithm to retrieve a consistent 32-year daily snow depth dataset from 1987 to 2018. This product was evaluated against the independent station observations during the period 1987–2018. The mean unbiased RMSE and bias were 7.1 and −0.05 cm, respectively, indicating better performance than that of the former snow depth dataset (8.4 and −1.20 cm) from the Environmental and Ecological Science Data Center for West China (WESTDC). Although the RF product was superior to the WESTDC dataset, it still underestimated deep snow cover (>20 cm), with biases of −10.4, −8.9, and −34.1 cm for northeast China (NEC), northern Xinjiang (XJ), and the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP), respectively. Additionally, the long-term snow depth datasets (station observations, RF estimates, and WESTDC product) were analyzed in terms of temporal and spatial variations over China. On a temporal scale, the ground truth snow depth presented a significant increasing trend from 1987 to 2018, especially in NEC. However, the RF and WESTDC products displayed no significant changing trends except on the QTP. The WESTDC product presented a significant decreasing trend on the QTP, with a correlation coefficient of −0.55, whereas there were no significant trends for ground truth observations and the RF product. For the spatial characteristics, similar trend patterns were observed for RF and WESTDC products over China. These characteristics presented significant decreasing trends in most areas and a significant increasing trend in central NEC.

28 June 2021 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPinja Venäläinen
Pinja Venäläinen
KLKari Luojus
Kari Luojus
JLJuha Lemmetyinen
Juha Lemmetyinen
JPJouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen
MMMikko Moisander
Mikko Moisander
MTMatias Takala
Matias Takala
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is an important variable in describing global seasonal snow cover. Traditionally, SWE has been measured manually at snow transects or using observations from weather stations. However, these measurements have a poor spatial coverage, and a good alternative to in situ measurements is to use spaceborne passive microwave observations, which can provide global coverage at daily timescales. The reliability and accuracy of SWE estimates made using spaceborne microwave radiometer data can be improved by assimilating radiometer observations with weather station snow depth observations as done in the GlobSnow SWE retrieval methodology. However, one possible source of uncertainty in the GlobSnow SWE retrieval approach is the constant snow density used in modelling emission of snow. In this paper, three versions of spatially and temporally varying snow density fields were implemented using snow transect data from Eurasia and Canada and automated snow observations from the United States. Snow density fields were used to post-process the baseline GlobSnow v.3.0 SWE product. Decadal snow density information, i.e. fields where snow density for each day of the year was taken as the mean calculated for the corresponding day over 10 years, was found to produce the best results. Overall, post-processing GlobSnow SWE retrieval with dynamic snow density information improved overestimation of small SWE values and underestimation of large SWE values, though underestimation of SWE values larger than 175 mm was still significant.