Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug commonly used in intensive care units (ICUs). The objective of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of levetiracetam dosing in patients with normal or augmented renal clearance (ARC) admitted to the ICU by population modelling and simulation. A multicentre prospective study including twenty-seven critically ill patients with urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 50 mL/min and treated with levetiracetam was developed. Levetiracetam plasma concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model. The parameter estimates and relative standard errors (%) were clearance (CL) 3.5 L/h (9%), central volume of distribution (V1) 20.7 L (18%), intercompartmental clearance 31.9 L/h (22%), and peripheral volume of distribution 33.5 L (13%). Interindividual variability estimates were, for the CL, 32.7% (21%) and, for V1, 56.1% (29%). The CrCl showed significant influence over CL. Simulations showed that the administration of at least 500 mg every 8 h or 1000 mg every 12 h are needed in patients with normal renal function. Higher doses (1500 or 2000 mg, every 8 h) are needed in patients with ARC. Critically ill patients with normal or ARC treated with levetiracetam could be at high risk of being underdosed.
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health threat that requires urgent solutions. One strategy to decrease resistance of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to β-lactam antibiotics (BL) is their combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI). Objectives: This systematic review analyses the outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of recently approved or under clinical development BLI and BL/BLI combinations. Methods: The systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were used to search for articles from January 2010 to November 2024. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of predefined exclusion and inclusion criteria. A quality assessment of the included studies was conducted following the New Castle-Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 191 articles addressing clinical research regarding the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and PK of new BL/BLI combinations with avibactam, durlobactam, enmetazobactam, nacubactam, relebactam, taniborbactam, tazobactam, vaborbactam and zidebactam were included. According to the published literature, clinical research supports the novel BL/BLI combinations for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) caused by GNB. In spite of that, the development of new BLI effective for class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) is still challenging, being aztreonam/avibactam the only approved combination active against MBL-producing bacteria. Conclusions: Although there has been extensive research to develop new BLI and BL/BLI combinations, only a few have reached the market. More evidence of its usefulness in the real world is still needed.
Fabry disease (FD) is a monogenic X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by a deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme α-Galactosidase A (α-Gal A). It is a good candidate to be treated with gene therapy, in which moderately low levels of enzyme activity should be sufficient for clinical efficacy. In the present work we have evaluated the efficacy of a non-viral vector based on solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) to increase α-Gal A activity in an FD mouse model after intravenous administration. The SLN-based vector incremented α-Gal A activity to about 10%, 15%, 20% and 14% of the levels of the wild-type in liver, spleen, heart and kidney, respectively. In addition, the SLN-based vector significantly increased α-Gal A activity with respect to the naked pDNA used as a control in plasma, heart and kidney. The administration of a dose per week for three weeks was more effective than a single-dose administration. Administration of the SLN-based vector did not increase liver transaminases, indicative of a lack of toxicity. Additional studies are necessary to optimize the efficacy of the system; however, these results reinforce the potential of lipid-based nanocarriers to treat FD by gene therapy.
This study was conducted to develop a rapid, simple and reproducible method for the quantification of ceftaroline in plasma samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). Sample processing consisted of methanol precipitation and then, after centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into the HPLC system, working in isocratic mode. Ceftaroline was detected at 238 nm at a short acquisition time (less than 5 min). The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range from 0.25 to 40 µg/mL, and the method appeared to be selective, precise and accurate. Ceftaroline in plasma samples was stable at −80 °C for at least 3 months. The method was successfully applied to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of ceftaroline in two critically ill patients and to evaluate whether the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target was reached or not with the dose regimen administered.
Background/Objectives: Omeprazole is widely used for managing gastrointestinal disorders like GERD, ulcers, and H. pylori infections. However, its use in pediatrics presents challenges due to drug interactions (DDIs), metabolic variability, and safety concerns. Omeprazole’s pharmacokinetics (PK), primarily influenced by CYP2C19 metabolism, is affected by ontogenetic changes in enzyme expression, complicating dosing in children. Methods: This study aimed to develop and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for omeprazole and its metabolites to predict age-related variations in metabolism and response. Results: The PBPK model successfully predicted exposure to parent and metabolites in adults and pediatrics, incorporating competitive and mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by omeprazole and its metabolites. By accounting for age-dependent metabolic pathways, the model enabled priori predictions of omeprazole exposure in different age groups. Linking PK to the pharmacodynamics (PD) model, we described the impact of age-related physiological changes on intragastric pH, the primary outcome for proton pump inhibitors efficacy. Conclusions: The PBPK-PD model allowed for the virtual testing of dosing scenarios, providing an alternative to clinical studies in pediatrics where traditional DDI studies are challenging. This approach offers valuable insights for accurate dosing recommendations in pediatrics, accounting for age-dependent variability in metabolism, and underscores the potential of PBPK modeling in guiding pediatric drug development.
Introduction: Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) are frequently used in critically ill patients; however, there are scarce in vitro and in vivo studies showing the extracorporeal elimination of ceftaroline and avibactam. The aim of this study was to assess, through an in vitro model, the extracorporeal elimination of ceftaroline and avibactam by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD), using a polysulfone hemofilter. Methods: Simulated in vitro experiments were performed using a multiFiltrate machine with a 1.4 m2 Ultraflux® AV600S polysulfone hemofilter. Isofundin® without or with bovine serum albumin was circulated as vehicle for ceftaroline or avibactam. Pre-filter, post-filter, and effluent samples were taken over a period of 60 min, and they were immediately stored at 4°C until processed in the same day. The quantification of ceftaroline and avibactam in the samples was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Protein binding, extraction coefficient (EC), and extracorporeal clearance (CLCRRT) were calculated. Results: The elimination of both ceftaroline and avibactam during the three extracorporeal modalities followed first-order pharmacokinetics. Regardless of the CRRT technique, EC values for both molecules were around 1, similar to the unbound fraction of avibactam (0.96) and higher than the unbound fraction of ceftaroline (0.79). CLCRRT of ceftaroline ranged from 15.63 to 17.66 mL/min when CVVH and CVVHD were used with a flow rate of 1,000 mL/h, and from 29.25 to 32.95 mL/min for the CVVHDF modality with a flow rate of 2,000 mL/h. For avibactam, CLCRRT ranged from 15.07 to 18.82 mL/min for CVVH and CVVHD, and from 33.74 to 34.13 mL/min for CVVHDF. Discussion: Avibactam and ceftaroline are extensively removed through the polysulfone membrane, and a dose adjustment may be recommended for patients under CRRT to ensure pharmacodynamic target achievement.