Francesca Thiebat

Dr. Francesca Thiebat

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco AsdrubaliFrancesco Asdrubali
Francesco Asdrubali
Gianluca GrazieschiGianluca Grazieschi
Gianluca Grazieschi
Marta RonconeMarta Roncone
Marta Roncone
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat
CCCorrado Carbonaro
Corrado Carbonaro
The growing attention to sustainability and life cycle issues by European and international policies has recently encouraged the adoption, in the construction sector, of environmental labels able to quantify the impacts on environment associated with the fabrication of several building materials, e.g., their embodied energy and carbon. Within this framework, since walls represent a large percentage of building mass and therefore of embodied impacts, this article collects and analyzes nearly 180 Environmental Products Declarations (EPDs) of wall construction products such as masonry blocks and concrete panels. The data related to the primary energy (renewable and non-renewable) and the global warming potential extracted from the EPDs were compared firstly at the block level (choosing 1 kg as functional unit), enabling designers and manufacturers to understand and reduce the impacts from wall products at the early design stage. As the design progresses, it is therefore necessary to evaluate the environmental impacts related to the entire wall system. For this purpose, this paper proposes a further investigation on some simple wall options having similar thermal performance and superficial mass (the functional unit chosen in this case was equal to 1 m2 with R ≈ 5 m2K/W, Ms ≈ 260 kg/m2). The outcomes showed how the durability of the materials and the potential of disassembly of the wall stratigraphies can play a crucial role in reducing the environmental impact. This paper provides a methodological reference both for manufacturers to reduce impacts and for designers committed to the application of environmental labeling in the design process since they will now be able to compare their products with others.

1 November 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IBIsabella Bianco
Isabella Bianco
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat
CCCorrado Carbonaro
Corrado Carbonaro
SPSimonetta Pagliolico
Simonetta Pagliolico
GBGian Andrea Blengini
Gian Andrea Blengini
ECElena Comino
Elena Comino

25 October 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
LSLorenzo Savio
Lorenzo Savio
DBDaniela Bosia
Daniela Bosia
Alessia PatruccoAlessia Patrucco
Alessia Patrucco
RPRoberto Pennacchio
Roberto Pennacchio
GPGabriele Piccablotto
Gabriele Piccablotto
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat

31 October 2023 in TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlessandro Claudi de Saint Mihiel
Alessandro Claudi de Saint Mihiel
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat

24 September 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat
Elena FregonaraElena Fregonara
Elena Fregonara
AMAlice Masoero
Alice Masoero
FMFiamma Martina Morselli
Fiamma Martina Morselli
CSChiara Senatore
Chiara Senatore
RGRoberto Giordano
Roberto Giordano
The textile and clothing (T&C) industry, despite its significant contribution to the European economy, is one of the most polluting industries globally. Therefore, the EU's Green Deal has identified the T&C sector as a strategic area for allocating public funding and transitioning towards a circular economy (CE). In this context, the “Circular Design for Natural Fibers” project, financed by the PNRR MICS “Made in Italy Circolare e Sostenibile” programme, focuses on enhancing the use of natural fibrous material, related by-products and waste from local production chains. In the research, a crucial aspect is the evaluation of the effectiveness of circularity through life cycle approaches, such as LCA, LCC, S-LCA and LCSA, for environmental, economic and social sustainability evaluation, respectively. A systematic review was carried out, to provide a synthesis of the available scientific evidence regarding the life cycle approaches in the international/national context within the production, processing, and post-consumer supply chains of natural fibers. The study identifies gaps in the literature on life cycle evaluation approaches for natural fibers. Specifically, the LCA approach appears preponderant compared to the others. The paper offers insights for researchers and professionals interested in improving the sustainability of natural fiber production processes and the evaluation of their overall sustainability.

30 May 2023 in TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FTFrancesca Thiebat
Francesca Thiebat