Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail

Prof. Dr. Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 April 2019 in International Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSharan Kumar Nagendran
Sharan Kumar Nagendran
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail

26 March 2013 in Materials and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YBYounes Bagheri
Younes Bagheri
FAFauziah Ahmad
Fauziah Ahmad
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail

1 October 2019 in Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
TMTaksiah A Majid
Taksiah A Majid
CGChin Ong Goh
Chin Ong Goh
SLSiao Phin Lim
Siao Phin Lim
CTChee Ghuan Tan
Chee Ghuan Tan

19 July 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Khaled EhwailatKhaled Ehwailat
Khaled Ehwailat
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
AEAli Muftah Abdussalam Ezreig
Ali Muftah Abdussalam Ezreig
The treatment of sulfate-bearing soil with calcium-based stabilizers such as cement or lime often results in ettringite formation, consequently leading to swelling and strength deterioration. Ettringite formation has negative environmental and economic effects on various civil engineering structures. This study was conducted to investigate the use of different materials (nano–magnesium oxide (M), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), and rice husk ash (RHA)) for gypseous soil stabilization to prevent ettringite formation. Various tests were performed, including flexural strength, unconfined compression strength, linear expansion, and microstructure analysis (SEM/EDX), on lime (L)-, (M)-, (M-RHA)-, (M-GGBS)-, and (M-GGBS-RHA)-stabilized gypseous soil samples to determine their properties. The results indicated that the swelling rates of the soil samples mixed with 20% M-RHA, M-GGBS, and M-GGBS-RHA binders were much lower (less than 0.01% of volume change) than those of the soil samples mixed with 10% and 20% lime-stabilized binders after a curing period of 90 days. Meanwhile, the strengths of the soil samples mixed with 20% of M-RHA, M-GGBS, and M-GGBS-RHA soil specimens after soaking of 90 days were obviously higher (with a range from 2.7–12.8 MPa) than those of the soil samples mixed with 20% of lime-stabilized binder. The SEM and EDX results showed no ettringite formation in the M-RHA-, M-GGBS-, and M-GGBS-RHA-stabilized soils. Overall, the test results proved the potential of M-RHA, M-GGBS, and M-GGBS-RHA as effective soil stabilizers.

31 May 2022 in Indian Geotechnical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KEKhaled Ibrahim Azarroug Ehwailat
Khaled Ibrahim Azarroug Ehwailat
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
AEAli Muftah Abdussalam Ezreig
Ali Muftah Abdussalam Ezreig

10 April 2018 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
MIMohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail
NKN. S. Kumar
N. S. Kumar
MAM. H. Z. Abidin
M. H. Z. Abidin
AMA. Madun
A. Madun