José M. Porcel

Prof. Dr. José M. Porcel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2014 in Archivos de Bronconeumología
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJosé M. Porcel
José M. Porcel
AEAureli Esquerda
Aureli Esquerda
MVManuel Vives
Manuel Vives
SBSilvia Bielsa
Silvia Bielsa

13 August 2009 in Lung
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJosé M. Porcel
José M. Porcel

23 February 2015 in Respirology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJosé M. Porcel
José M. Porcel
AGAriadna Gasol
Ariadna Gasol
SBSilvia Bielsa
Silvia Bielsa
CCCarme Civit
Carme Civit
RLRichard W. Light
Richard W. Light
ASAntonia Salud
Antonia Salud

1 December 2004 in Chest
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJosé M. Porcel
José M. Porcel
MVManuel Vives
Manuel Vives
AEAureli Esquerda
Aureli Esquerda
ASAntonia Salud
Antonia Salud
BPBegoña Pérez
Begoña Pérez
FRFrancisco Rodríguez-Panadero
Francisco Rodríguez-Panadero

13 October 2022 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBEihab O Bedawi
Eihab O Bedawi
Sara RicciardiSara Ricciardi
Sara Ricciardi
MHMaged Hassan
Maged Hassan
MGMichael R. Gooseman
Michael R. Gooseman
RARachelle Asciak
Rachelle Asciak
NRNajib Rahman
Najib Rahman
Objective Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and in situ lesions can be stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) and TP53 status into prognostic risk groups using p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry. We assessed the significance of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma resection margin positivity for either differentiated vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (dVIN) or abnormal p53 immunohistochemistry, and other pathologic variables, in a cohort of patients with HPV-independent (HPV-I) p53 abnormal (p53abn) vulvar squamous cell carcinomas. Methods Patients with stage I–II HPV-I p53abn vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with negative invasive margins who did not receive adjuvant radiation from a single institution were included. Tumors underwent margin reassessment using p53 immunohistochemistry. Cases were segregated into (1) morphologic dVIN at margin; or (2) abnormal p53 immunohistochemistry staining at margin without morphologic dVIN (p53abn immunohistochemistry); or (3) margins negative by morphology and p53 immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathologic/outcome data were collected. Results A total of 51 patients were evaluated: (1) 12 with dVIN on margin; (2) 12 with p53abn immunohistochemistry on margin without morphologic dVIN; and (3) 27 with margins negative for morphologic dVIN and p53abn immunohistochemistry. The recurrence rate for patients with dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry on the margin was equally high at 75% each, compared with 33% with margins negative for morphologic dVIN and p53abn immunohistochemistry (p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, positive in situ margins maintained an association with disease recurrence (p=0.03) whereas invasive margin distance (radial and deep), lymphovascular invasion, and tumor size did not. Conclusions Patients with stage I–II HPV-I vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with margins positive for either dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry without morphologic dVIN showed increased disease recurrence, regardless of invasive margin distance. These findings show that p53 immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct for evaluating margin status in HPV-I vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and may support repeat excision for positive in situ margins (dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry).

1 October 2010 in European Journal of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJosé M. Porcel
José M. Porcel
AEAureli Esquerda
Aureli Esquerda
SBSilvia Bielsa
Silvia Bielsa