Background: Invasive and costly endoscopic diagnosis is obligatory for the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of serum biomarkers involved in eosinophil-mediated inflammation in the management of EoE. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 58 patients with dysphagia. Each participant completed a health questionnaire, underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsy for histopathological examination and assessment of total, inflammatory and fibrostenotic Eosinophilic Esophagitis Reference Score (EREFS). Serum levels of interleukin 5 (IL-5), interleukin 13 (IL-13), transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), major basic protein (MBP), and eotaxin 3 were determined by enzyme immunoassays. Total of 16 patients meeting the histological criteria for EoE were treated with proton pump inhibitors for 8 weeks, and then the same diagnostics was performed again. Results: Statistically significantly higher concentrations of MBP and TGF-β1 were demonstrated in the group of patients with EoE, while MBP and eotaxin 3 correlated with the peak eosinophil count (PEC). Baseline MBP levels and eotaxin 3 after treatment significantly positively correlated with EREFS. There was a negative correlation between IL-13 and fibrostenotic EREFS. Additionally, after treatment, a negative correlation TGF-β1 was noted with the inflammatory EREFS and a positive correlation with the fibrostenotic EREFS. Conclusions: The potential role of MBP in predicting the diagnosis of EoE, eotaxin 3 in predicting the advancement and correlation of IL-13 and TGF-β1 in differentiating the inflammatory and fibrotic course of the disease may facilitate the management and individualization of EoE therapy.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remain a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies. Melatonin (MEL), an indoleamine with pleiotropic biological activities, has emerged as a promising adjuvant in oncology due to its antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and antioxidant properties. This review synthesizes current evidence on MEL's molecular mechanisms in GI carcinogenesis, including modulation of NF‐κB, PI3K/AKT, and Wnt/β‐catenin pathways, suppression of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and regulation of circadian rhythm‐related genes (e.g., CLOCK, BMAL1). Preclinical studies demonstrate that MEL enhances chemoradiotherapy efficacy‐reducing tumor volume by 70% in murine colorectal models and decreasing 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) resistance via miR‐532‐3p/β‐catenin axis modulation. Clinical trials report a 23%–41% risk reduction in colorectal cancer among shift workers with MEL supplementation and a 53% decrease in radiotherapy‐induced oral mucositis. Despite promising data, limitations persist: fewer than 15% of clinical trials focus on GI cancers, dosing remains unstandardized (10–40 mg/day), and molecular heterogeneity (e.g., KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer) may limit therapeutic responses. Future research must prioritize phase III trials, chronotherapy optimization, and biomarker‐driven approaches, including MT1/MT2 receptor expression and microbiome profiling. Given its low toxicity and putative synergy with immunotherapies, MEL should be regarded as an adjunct under investigation rather than an established option; to date, no GI‐specific phase III randomized trials exist, and clinical signals come primarily from small, heterogeneous cohorts. Dosing is unstandardized and limited by low oral bioavailability (first‐pass) and possible pharmacogenomic variability.

Background: Esophageal dysmotility may be the cause or a secondary effect of gastric acid-dependent diseases: erosive reflux disease (ERD), Schatzki ring (SR) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Methods: This study aims to compare concomitant dysphagia with ERD, SR and EoE, considering manometric patterns, their role in the natural history and their impact on assessing quality of life. Fifty-eight patients with dysphagia underwent high-resolution manometry and esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) with an assessment of SR, ERD and sampling for EoE, completed a questionnaire with the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Based on endoscopic images and the histopathological criterion of EoE (≥15 eosinophils/high-power field), patients were assigned to groups with ERD, EoE, SR and with normal endoscopic and histopathological images. In the data analysis, p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT04803162). Results: Both EoE, SR and ERD correlate with ineffective motility. In ERD, normal peristalsis precedes the development of the disease, unlike EoE, which develops later and leads to absent contractility. The development of SR is associated with disorders of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). In the group with SR and ERD, UES insufficiency significantly reduces the quality of life. Patients with normal esophagus in EGD scored the lowest quality of life and those with SR had the most severe dysphagia. Conclusion: The esophageal motility disorders co-occurring with endoscopic and histological anomalies do not significantly affect the severity of dysphagia, however, in the case of patients with ERD and SR and concomitant UES insufficiency, this motor dysfunction has a significant impact on the reduction in the patients’ quality of life. Although no specific esophageal motility pattern typical of EoE, ERD and SR has been identified, comparative assessment of manometric features may have a potential role in differential diagnosis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease with non-specific symptoms, among which dysphagia is a prevailing one. The observed increase of EoE rate, its chronic and recurrent character, as well as invasive follow-up examination (periodical panendoscopy with specimen collection for...

Background/objective: The involvement of hydrochloric acid in the etiology of eosinophilic esophagitis and numerous reports on its coexistence and interaction with reflux disease, as well as the rings of the esophageal mucosa formed with the advancement of the disease, suggest a potential association of eosinophilic esophagitis with another disorder of esophageal morphology potentially caused by exposure to acid reflux–Schatzki ring. Therefore, it seems reasonable to check the relationship of eosinophilic esophagitis with the coexistence of the Schatzki ring as a potential effect of advanced esophageal trachealization, which is the subject of this systematic review with a meta-analysis. Methods: The protocol of this meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. A systematic search of the indexed literature in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases from early to December 2019 was performed to identify all original research articles on the association between the occurrence of the Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis in adults. Results: Out of 68 searched studies, after the analysis and evaluation of the works, only 4 met the criteria set according to the protocol and were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the performed meta-analysis, no relationship was found between the occurrence of Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis. Conclusion: The present study did not show a significant relationship between the occurrence of the Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis in the adult population, which suggests that these are two independent causes of dysphagia in this patient population.

Patent ductus arteriosus – not only a paediatric issue