Schnitzler's syndrome is characterized by recurrent urticarial rash and monoclonal gammopathy, associated with clinical and biological signs of inflammation and a long‐term risk of AA amyloidosis and overt lymphoproliferation. An extensive literature review was performed, and the following questions were addressed during an expert meeting: In whom should Schnitzler's syndrome be suspected? How should the diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome be established? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be treated? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be followed up?. A diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome is considered definite in any patient with two obligate criteria: a recurrent urticarial rash and a monoclonal IgM gammopathy, and two of the following minor criteria: recurrent fever, objective signs of abnormal bone remodeling, elevated CRP level or leukocytosis, and a neutrophilic infiltrate on skin biopsy. It is considered probable, if only 1 minor criterion is present. In patients with monoclonal IgG gammopathies, diagnosis is definite if three minor criteria are present and possible if two are present. First‐line treatment in patients with significant alteration of quality of life or persistent elevation of markers of inflammation should be anakinra. Follow‐up should include clinical evaluation, CBC and CRP every 3 months and MGUS as usually recommended.
1 July 2013 in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
The clinical aspects and the histologic features of cutaneous mucinoses have been reviewed and their classification updated. Cutaneous mucinoses are divided into distinctive (primary) cutaneous mucinoses in which the mucin deposit is the main histologic feature resulting in clinically distinctive lesions, and disorders associated with histologic mucin deposition as an additional finding (secondary mucinoses). The former are further divided into degenerative-inflammatory mucinoses, which may be either dermal or follicular, and into neoplastic-hamartomatous mucinoses. Histopathologic diagnosis is particularly difficult for dermal mucinoses and requires clinicopathologic correlation. Three histologic clues, namely the pattern of mucin distribution (diffuse or focal), the level of mucin deposit in the dermis and some additional findings may help diagnosis. Follicular mucinoses have the easiest pattern to recognize histologically, but the distinction between Pinkus' follicular mucinosis and follicular mucinosis with mycosis fungoides is very difficult. Lastly, neoplastic-hamartomatous cutaneous mucinoses include mucinous nevus, a benign hamartoma, and myxoma, which is a benign tumor to be differentiated from reactive cutaneous focal mucinosis.
1 November 2003 in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology