Background: With the recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, microsatellite instability (MSI) status has become an important biomarker for immune checkpoint blockade therapy. There are growing technical demands for the integration of different genomic alterations profiling including MSI analysis in a single assay for full use of the limited tissues. Methods: Tumor and paired control samples from 64 patients with primary colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study, including 14 MSI-high (MSI-H) cases and 50 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases determined by MSI-PCR. All the samples were sequenced by a customized NGS panel covering 2.2 MB. A training dataset of 28 samples was used for selection of microsatellite loci and a novel NGS-based MSI status classifier, USCI-msi, was developed. NGS-based MSI status, single nucleotide variant (SNV) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were detected for all patients. Most of the patients were also independently detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Results: A 9-loci model for detecting microsatellite instability was able to correctly predict MSI status with 100% sensitivity and specificity compared with MSI-PCR, and 84.3% overall concordance with IHC staining. Mutations in cancer driver genes (APC, TP53, and KRAS) were dispersed in MSI-H and MSS cases, while BRAF p.V600E and frameshifts in TCF7L2 gene occurred only in MSI-H cases. Mismatch repair (MMR)-related genes are highly mutated in MSI-H samples. Conclusion: We established a new NGS-based MSI classifier, USCI-msi, with as few as 9 microsatellite loci for detecting MSI status in CRC cases. This approach possesses 100% sensitivity and specificity, and performed robustly in samples with low tumor purity.

EP300-ZNF384 fusion is a rare recurrent cytogenetic abnormality associated with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), which was rarely studied in Chinese patient cohort. Here, we used a customized RNA fusion gene panel to investigate gene fusions in 56 selected acute leukemia patients without conventional genetic abnormalities. Two EP300-ZNF384 fusion forms were detected in ten cases, which were in-frame fusions of EP300 exon 6 fused with exon 3 or 2 of ZNF384. The fusions led to the lack of most functional domains of EP300. We firstly reported EP300-ZNF384 fusion in a mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) patient whose CD33 and CD13 were negative. The rest nine B-ALL patients with EP300-ZNF384 fusion expressed CD33 and/or CD13. Fifty-six percent of B-ALL patients (5/9) with EP300-ZNF384 fusion were positive with CD10. After the diagnosis of EP300-ZNF384 fusion, 70% of the patients achieved remission after chemotherapy. Our observations indicated that EP300-ZNF384 fusion consists of a distinct subgroup of B-ALL with a characteristic immunophenotype. These patients are sensitive to current chemotherapy regimen and have an excellent outcome.

Introduction: Retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision (TRNU) is the traditional way to manage upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Whereas, the patient has to reposition from lateral position to supine position, resterilize, and be with a large incision in the lower abdomen, which is time consuming and pain-full. Here, we describe a new surgical procedure, single-position complete retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (SCRNU). Methods: We evaluated 86 patients diagnosed with UTUC at our hospital from June 2013 to June 2021. The patients underwent TRNU (n=28) or SCRNU (n=58). Demographic, peroperative, and follow-up data were collected and compared retrospectively. Results: All 86 patients underwent successful procedures of radical nephroureterectomy, without transferring into open surgery. The average follow-up time was 45.4 months for the SCRNU group and 39 months for the TRNU group. All follow-up patients were alive without bladder incision tumor. Further, The follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of bladder tumor between the two methods.The SCRNU group was superior to the TRNU group in all the evaluation parameters, including operation time, perioperative complications, postoperative pain recurrence rate and treatment fee. Conclusion: Our modified technique SCRNU is more minimally invasive, simplified, cost-effective and with low recurrence rates for managing UTUC.

Introduction: Myeloid neoplasms with platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRB) rearrangement usually present with eosinophilia in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. Here we report a case of systemic mastocytosis related myeloid neoplasms with basophilia and PRKG2–PDGFRB fusion gene. Patient's concerns: A 53-year-old male patient felt fatigue with thrombocythemia and normal hemoglobin over 2 years. Considering the possibility of primary thrombocytosis, the patient was treated with hydroxyurea and interferon. Then the therapy was stopped due to adverse events and worsen condition. Diagnosis: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) diagnosis was confirmed by bone marrow morphology and flow cytometry. PDGFRB rearrangement was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test, with chromosome karyotype 46,XY,t(4:5)(q21:q33). PRKG2–PDGFRB fusion was observed by next generation sequencing (NGS) and verified by RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The results of bone marrow aspiration, bone marrow biopsy, and immunophenotyping showed systemic mastocytosis-related myeloid tumor with basophilia. Interventions: Imatinib 400 mg/d was given on the day of admission. Azacitidine 75 mg/m² was given for induction therapy for 10 days, and followed by one course of DHAG consolidating therapy. Imatinib was taken orally continuously. Outcomes: On the 8th day of treatment, the patient's diet and fatigue improved. The hematological and bone marrow morphological remission was achieved on the 25th day. Cytogenetic complete remission was achieved 3 months later and continued to present (December 20, 2020). PRKG2–PDGFRB fusion gene turned negative 7 months later from diagnosis. Lessons: Patients with increased basophilic granulocyte and/or mast cells in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow should be screened for PDGFRB abnormality and myeloid or lymphatic tumor. Patients bearing PDGFRB abnormality have a good response to imatinib.