Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health and widespread problem, and perpetrator programmes are in a unique position to work towards the end of gender-based violence. However, in order to promote safe perpetrator work, it is crucial to focus on the impact of IPV on the victims and survivors. In this context, little research has triangulated data by including both, victim’s perspectives on the impact that IPV has on them and also men’s level of awareness of the impact of their violent behaviour. In this paper, results from the “Impact Outcome Monitoring Toolkit (Impact Toolkit)” from one perpetrator treatment programme in the UK are presented. Participants were 98 in total; 49 men that were following treatment in a perpetrator program and their (ex-) partners. The differences in their perceptions of the IPV, but also on the impact of this abusive behavior on the victims, is described. Finally, recommendations for research and practice are discussed.

This systematic review assessed whether studies on the outcomes of perpetrator programs comply with the model recommendations for outcome evaluation. Three databases (PsycINFO, Medline, and Scopus) were used to identify perpetrator program outcome studies from 1988 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: empirical studies with no time restriction; published in English or Spanish; evaluated interventions aimed at male perpetrators of any type of abuse toward women; evaluated the effectiveness of the intervention in a follow-up post-intervention; and provided an indicator of recidivism. The search and selection process resulted in 46 original studies. The results showed that studies did not include a thorough description of the study sample. Many approaches to psychological intervention are used, with cognitive behavioral therapy being the most widely used. Most studies did not describe the program content. Dropout rates varied greatly from one study to another (from 0% to 64%) and only eight studies provided dropout rates specified by each type of perpetrator. The follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 9 years. The recidivism rates (ranging from 5% to 72.5%), and their assessments were also very different. Only 12 of the 46 studies (26.1%) used more than one source to obtain recidivism rates. In terms of outcomes, few studies considered (ex-) partner accounts. Some studies had other measures of outcome, whereas a few included a pretest–posttest. In summary, these studies do not follow the recommendations of the model.

Introduction: In Spain and Italy, it is estimated that childrens’ first contact with pornography can occur before the age of 10 years. Minors in this position lack the emotional tools necessary to analyze pornographic content critically. However, many adolescents do not discuss issues related to sexuality with their parents or teachers because they feel embarrassed or perceive those figures as insufficiently knowledgeable. This study analyzed the knowledge, attitudes, and awareness of parents and teachers regarding young people’s internet usage and pornography consumption and their preparedness to discuss sexuality and pornography with their children or pupils. Methods: The participants ( N = 142) included 74 parents (52.1%) and 68 teachers (47.9%) who were from Spain (51.7%) or Italy (48.3%). Two ad hoc questionnaires were used in this research. Results: Compared to parents, teachers attributed higher levels of pornography consumption to young people. Parents and teachers expressed similar views regarding the adverse effects of pornography consumption. Discussing pornography with children was identified as challenging by parents (more than 1/3 of whom had never discussed this topic) and especially by teachers (half of whom had never discussed this issue). Few parents and teachers had received training in these issues; this lack was especially notable among Italian teachers. Conclusions: These results highlight the need to increase the training provided to parents and teachers in these areas to improve children’s satisfaction with sexuality education programs. Policy Implications: It is necessary to develop child-focused sexuality education programs that involve parents and teachers and range beyond an adult-centered agenda.