N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a carcinogenic chemical, has recently been identified in ranitidine. We conducted a population-based study to explore ranitidine use and cancer emergence over time. Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a population-based cohort study was conducted. A total of 55,110 eligible patients who received ranitidine between January 2000 and December 2018 were enrolled in the treated cohort. We conducted a 1:1 propensity-score-matching procedure to match the ranitidine-treated group with the ranitidine-untreated group and famotidine controls for a longitudinal study. The association of ranitidine exposure with cancer outcomes was assessed. A multivariable Cox regression analysis that compared cancer risk with the untreated groups revealed that ranitidine increased the risk of liver (hazard ratio (HR): 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–1.36, p < 0.001), lung (HR: 1.17, CI: 1.05–1.31, p = 0.005), gastric (HR: 1.26, CI: 1.05–1.52, p = 0.012), and pancreatic cancers (HR 1.35, CI: 1.03–1.77, p = 0.030). Our real-world observational study strongly supports the pathogenic role of NDMA contamination, given that long-term ranitidine use is associated with a higher likelihood of liver cancer development in ranitidine users compared with the control groups of non-ranitidine users treated with famotidine or proton-pump inhibitors.
Background: The postoperative bleeding complications associated with laser surgery of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were compared. Methods: We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to conduct an observational population-based cohort study. All eligible patients who received transurethral procedures between January 2015 and September 2018 were enrolled. Patients who received laser surgery or TURP were matched at a ratio of 1:1 by using propensity score matching, and the association of these procedures with bleeding events was evaluated. Results: A total of 3302 patients who underwent elective transurethral procedures were included. The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) resulted in significantly higher emergency room risks within 90 days after surgery due to clot retention than the Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) (Hazard Ratio: 1.52; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.06–2.16, p = 0.022). Moreover, GreenLight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP) (0.61; 95% CI, 0.38–1.00 p = 0.050) and thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) (0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.95, p = 0.024) resulted in significantly fewer rehospitalization due to clot retention than did M-TURP. No significant increase in blood clots were observed in patients using comedications and those with different demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Conclusions: Among the investigated six transurethral procedures for Benign prostatic hyperplasia, PVP and ThuVARP were safer than M-TURP because bleeding events and clot retention were less likely to occur, even in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. However, DiLEP and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) did not result in fewer bleeding events than M-TURP.
Background: The long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain unclear, necessitating further investigations of the association between HRT and the development of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in postmenopausal women. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims (2001–2018) to identify postmenopausal women aged ≥ 50 years with HRT use. A one-year washout period was applied before the index date to ensure new HRT users. To address the immortal time bias, follow-up for HRT users began at HRT initiation. The non-HRT group was selected by 1:1 propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for comorbidities and medications were used to estimate hazard ratios. Results: A total of 10,126 postmenopausal women (5063 per group) were included. During a mean follow-up of 11.1 years, the incidence rates of ulcerative colitis were 0.14 and 0.11 per 1000 person-years in the HRT and non-HRT groups, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios were 1.33 (95% CI, 0.46–3.83; p = 0.600) for ulcerative colitis and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45–1.16; p = 0.177) for Crohn’s disease. Conclusions: This longitudinal study suggests that HRT use is not significantly associated with the risk of IBD among postmenopausal women. These findings indicate that IBD risk may not need to be a primary concern when considering HRT in this population.