Background and Objectives: There is an urgency to respond to the longstanding deficiencies in health human resources in the long-term care (LTC) home sector, which have been laid bare by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nurse practitioners (NPs) represent an efficient solution to human resource challenges. During the current pandemic, many Medical Directors in LTC homes worked virtually to reduce the risk of transmission. In contrast, NPs were present for in-person care. This study aims to understand the NPs’ roles in optimizing resident care and supporting LTC staff during the pandemic. Research Design and Methods: This exploratory qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach. A purposive sample of 14 NPs working in LTC homes in Ontario, Canada, was recruited. Data were generated using semistructured interviews and examined using thematic analysis. Results: Four categories relating to the NPs’ practices and experiences during the pandemic were identified: (a) containing the spread of COVID-19, (b) stepping in where needed, (c) supporting staff and families, and (d) establishing links between fragmented systems of care by acting as a liaison. Discussion and Implications: The findings suggest that innovative models of care that include NPs in LTC homes are required moving forward. NPs embraced a multitude of roles in LTC homes, but the need to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 was central to how they prioritized their days. The pandemic clearly accentuated that NPs have a unique scope of practice, which positions them well to act as leaders and build capacity in LTC homes.

Due to the interplay of multiple complex and interrelated factors, long-term care (LTC) home residents are increasingly vulnerable to sustaining poor outcomes in crisis situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic. While death is considered an unavoidable end for LTC home residents, the importance of facilitating a good death is one of the primary goals of palliative and end-of-life care. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are well-situated to optimize the palliative and end-of-life care needs of LTC home residents. This study explores the role of NPs in facilitating a dignified death for LTC home residents while also facing increased pressures related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The current exploratory qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach. A purposive sample of 14 NPs working in LTC homes was recruited. Data were generated using semi-structured interviews and examined using thematic analysis. Three categories were derived: (a) advance care planning and goals of care discussions; (b) pain and symptom management at the end-of-life; and (c) care after death. The findings suggest that further implementation of the NP role in LTC homes in collaboration with LTC home team and external partners will promote a good death and optimize the experiences of residents and their care partners during the end-of-life journey.

Objectives: New models for the workforce are required in long-term care (LTC) homes, as was made evident during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led models of care represent an effective solution. This study explored NPs’ roles in supporting LTC homes as changes in directives, policies, and recommendations related to COVID-19 were introduced. Design: Qualitative exploratory study. Context: Thirteen NPs working in LTC homes in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in March/April 2021. A five-step inductive thematic analysis was applied. Findings: Analysis generated four themes: leading the COVID-19 vaccine rollout; promoting staff wellbeing related to COVID-19 fatigue; addressing complexities of new admissions; and negotiating evolving collaborative relationships. Conclusions: Nurse practitioners were instrumental in supporting LTC homes through COVID-19 regulatory changes producing unintended consequences. The NPs’ leadership in transforming care is equally essential in LTC homes as in other established healthcare settings, such as primary and acute care.

Objectives Despite inpatient rehabilitation, many older adults post-hip fracture have difficulty returning to their prefracture levels of function and activity. This scoping review aims to identify interventions for community-dwelling older adults discharged from inpatient rehabilitation and examine the function and activity outcomes associated with these interventions. Design This scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework. Data sources We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Ageline electronic databases for English-language articles published between January 1946 and January 2020. Eligibility criteria We included studies with health and social interventions involving community-dwelling older adults and their caregivers after hip fracture and inpatient rehabilitation. The interventions were selected if initiated within 60 days post-hip fracture surgery. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full texts and extracted the data based on the inclusion criteria. A third reviewer adjudicated any disagreement and collated the extracted data. Results Of the 24 studies included in the review, most studies (79%) used exercise-based interventions, over half (63%) included activities of daily living training and/or home assessment and environment modification as intervention components, and three studies used social intervention components. Over half of the interventions (58%) were initiated in the inpatient setting and physiotherapists provided 83% of the interventions. Only seven studies (29%) involved tailored interventions based on the older adults’ unique needs and progress in exercise training. Six studies (25%) enrolled patients with cognitive impairment, and only one study examined caregiver-related outcomes. Exercise-based interventions led to improved function and activity outcomes. 29 different outcome measures were reported. Conclusion While exercise-based multicomponent interventions have evidence for improving outcomes in this population, there is a paucity of studies, including social interventions. Further, studies with standardised outcome measures are needed, particularly focusing on supporting caregivers and the recovery of older adults with cognitive impairment.

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability worldwide. The majority of stroke survivors are left with devastating functional impairments for which few treatment options exist. Recently, a number of studies have used ectopic expression of transcription factors that direct neuronal cell fate with the intention of converting astrocytes to neurons in various models of brain injury and disease. While there have been reports that question whether astrocyte-to-neuron conversion occurs in vivo, here, we have asked if ectopic expression of the transcription factor Neurod1 is sufficient to promote improved functional outcomes when delivered in the subacute phase following endothelin-1-induced sensory–motor cortex stroke. We used an adeno-associated virus to deliver Neurod1 from the short GFAP promoter and demonstrated improved functional outcomes as early as 28 days post-stroke and persisting to at least 63 days post-stroke. Using Cre-based cell fate tracking, we showed that functional recovery correlated with the expression of neuronal markers in transduced cells by 28 days post-stroke. By 63 days post-stroke, the reporter-expressing cells comprised ~20% of all the neurons in the perilesional cortex and expressed markers of cortical neuron subtypes. Overall, our findings indicate that ectopic expression of Neurod1 in the stroke-injured brain is sufficient to enhance neural repair.

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability with few treatment options for stroke survivors. Astrocyte reprogramming to neurons enables the targetedin vivogeneration of new cells at the site of injury and represents a novel approach for brain repair. A number of studies have demonstrated successful conversion of astrocytes to neurons in various models of brain injury and disease; however, the impact of this strategy on tissue and functional outcome following stroke is not well established. Using AAV delivery of the transcription factor NeuroD1, we reprogrammed astrocytes 7 days after endothelin-1 induced cortical stroke, and studied the long-term cellular and functional outcomes. We found that by 63 days post-stroke, 20% of neurons in the perilesional cortex were reprogrammed. Furthermore, reprogrammed neurons had matured into regionally appropriate neuronal subtypes. Importantly, this treatment was associated with improved functional outcome using the foot fault test and gait analysis. Together, our findings indicate thatin vivoreprogramming is a promising regenerative approach for stroke repair.